Artwork

Debra Atkinson에서 제공하는 콘텐츠입니다. 에피소드, 그래픽, 팟캐스트 설명을 포함한 모든 팟캐스트 콘텐츠는 Debra Atkinson 또는 해당 팟캐스트 플랫폼 파트너가 직접 업로드하고 제공합니다. 누군가가 귀하의 허락 없이 귀하의 저작물을 사용하고 있다고 생각되는 경우 여기에 설명된 절차를 따르실 수 있습니다 https://ko.player.fm/legal.
Player FM -팟 캐스트 앱
Player FM 앱으로 오프라인으로 전환하세요!

How I Choose Podcast Guests and Controversial Topics

21:05
 
공유
 

Manage episode 445467802 series 2390800
Debra Atkinson에서 제공하는 콘텐츠입니다. 에피소드, 그래픽, 팟캐스트 설명을 포함한 모든 팟캐스트 콘텐츠는 Debra Atkinson 또는 해당 팟캐스트 플랫폼 파트너가 직접 업로드하고 제공합니다. 누군가가 귀하의 허락 없이 귀하의 저작물을 사용하고 있다고 생각되는 경우 여기에 설명된 절차를 따르실 수 있습니다 https://ko.player.fm/legal.

In this episode, it’s all about how I choose podcast guests.

First before we get started, I appreciate your thoughts. I work hard on keeping an open mind and listening to suggestions. Though I can’t take action on all of them, we are here because of you. There’s this dance between the expert, experienced, the educated individual in me giving advice even creating programs in a way that may go in opposition of what you want.

That is because I’m applying 40 years of science studies, combining the physiology of fitness with physiology of menopause, and with the science of human behavior and change. We’ve created things that will make some of you contest the way we deliver them.

I wanted to share how we come to accept or reject for now guests who apply for the show or who are pitched by PR firms. How we reach out to find professionals who can not only share science but share stories, theirs and clients or patients they’ve worked with.

Someone recently was upset hearing a guest used Ivermectin to overcome C-19.

Others have suggested that Ozempic or semaglutide, drugs were black and white.

Another listener and social media follower said though she’d followed for years, she thought I’d lost it (meaning marbles) when I hosted someone discussing energy frequencies.

I have experts who want to come on and talk about Keto and intermittent fasting. I have professional opinions about both based on my 40 years of experience working with midlife women and our community of more than 300K women.

But I won’t just turn them away. I’ll ask if they’re open to a conversation about when and how and why it might not be appropriate for everyone all the time. If they’re willing to agree to disagree and to help a listener hear both sides of the story and decide for themselves what and when and why, I still may bring them on.

I also reserve the right to not publish recordings that are poor sound quality, or a discussion that was terribly awkward when a guest didn’t answer questions I asked but followed some hidden agenda.

How I Choose Podcast Guests and Topics for You

In response to the Ivermectin question:

Actually, many of the function physicians I work with use this personally if they've caught it soon enough.

I don't know that we have to agree with 100% of what any expert or human does or says. But I do think personally we have to keep listening and taking in another set of thoughts.

Otherwise, we'd still be believing that the retracted study data suggesting that HRT, specifically bHRT was a threat vs a life-preserving option for women.

All said with respect. I wish I had the luxury of not listening to someone because I didn't agree with every thought: it would relieve a lot tension! But I've had to be willing to adjust my thinking and see science interpreted from all sides.

Certainly, hope this isn't irritating and lands as intended for you as the means of my own filter for women.

I've hosted Intermittent Fasting experts knowing fed exercise is more optimal for women in midlife and beyond for 8 years.. and guess what... they've come around, and two big proponents are now agreeing with the science suggesting that we have to choose priorities and timing of everything.

That wouldn't have happened without someone challenging their thoughts and listening to the conversation.

I must host those I agree with, those I don't, and be transparent about that.

Not long ago, hormone replacement therapy was very misunderstood. Recently, someone I know well consulted with her physician and was told, going on would be more risky than not because it’s been too long since menopause.

Other doctors are adamant that this is not the case. I’ll continue to bring them on. You DO have choices. One physician only has the experience they have and the degree to which they’re comfortable making changes in thoughts, information and actions …. Is the medical care you’ll receive from them.

I’d love to hear your response to this episode.

Resources:

5 Day Flip:

https://www.flippingfifty.com/5-day-challenge-new/

Discovery Call:

https://www.flippingfifty.com/wellness-coaching-for-life/

Ultimate Assessment:

https://www.flippingfifty.com/store/coaching-programs/private-coaching-90-min/

Other Episodes You Might Like:.

Can I Still Start Hormones 10 Years After Menopause? Doctors Respond:

https://www.flippingfifty.com/start-hormones-10-years-after-menopause/

One Thing I Would Change After 40 Years Working with Women in Menopause:

https://www.flippingfifty.com/working-with-women-in-menopause/

  continue reading

159 에피소드

Artwork
icon공유
 
Manage episode 445467802 series 2390800
Debra Atkinson에서 제공하는 콘텐츠입니다. 에피소드, 그래픽, 팟캐스트 설명을 포함한 모든 팟캐스트 콘텐츠는 Debra Atkinson 또는 해당 팟캐스트 플랫폼 파트너가 직접 업로드하고 제공합니다. 누군가가 귀하의 허락 없이 귀하의 저작물을 사용하고 있다고 생각되는 경우 여기에 설명된 절차를 따르실 수 있습니다 https://ko.player.fm/legal.

In this episode, it’s all about how I choose podcast guests.

First before we get started, I appreciate your thoughts. I work hard on keeping an open mind and listening to suggestions. Though I can’t take action on all of them, we are here because of you. There’s this dance between the expert, experienced, the educated individual in me giving advice even creating programs in a way that may go in opposition of what you want.

That is because I’m applying 40 years of science studies, combining the physiology of fitness with physiology of menopause, and with the science of human behavior and change. We’ve created things that will make some of you contest the way we deliver them.

I wanted to share how we come to accept or reject for now guests who apply for the show or who are pitched by PR firms. How we reach out to find professionals who can not only share science but share stories, theirs and clients or patients they’ve worked with.

Someone recently was upset hearing a guest used Ivermectin to overcome C-19.

Others have suggested that Ozempic or semaglutide, drugs were black and white.

Another listener and social media follower said though she’d followed for years, she thought I’d lost it (meaning marbles) when I hosted someone discussing energy frequencies.

I have experts who want to come on and talk about Keto and intermittent fasting. I have professional opinions about both based on my 40 years of experience working with midlife women and our community of more than 300K women.

But I won’t just turn them away. I’ll ask if they’re open to a conversation about when and how and why it might not be appropriate for everyone all the time. If they’re willing to agree to disagree and to help a listener hear both sides of the story and decide for themselves what and when and why, I still may bring them on.

I also reserve the right to not publish recordings that are poor sound quality, or a discussion that was terribly awkward when a guest didn’t answer questions I asked but followed some hidden agenda.

How I Choose Podcast Guests and Topics for You

In response to the Ivermectin question:

Actually, many of the function physicians I work with use this personally if they've caught it soon enough.

I don't know that we have to agree with 100% of what any expert or human does or says. But I do think personally we have to keep listening and taking in another set of thoughts.

Otherwise, we'd still be believing that the retracted study data suggesting that HRT, specifically bHRT was a threat vs a life-preserving option for women.

All said with respect. I wish I had the luxury of not listening to someone because I didn't agree with every thought: it would relieve a lot tension! But I've had to be willing to adjust my thinking and see science interpreted from all sides.

Certainly, hope this isn't irritating and lands as intended for you as the means of my own filter for women.

I've hosted Intermittent Fasting experts knowing fed exercise is more optimal for women in midlife and beyond for 8 years.. and guess what... they've come around, and two big proponents are now agreeing with the science suggesting that we have to choose priorities and timing of everything.

That wouldn't have happened without someone challenging their thoughts and listening to the conversation.

I must host those I agree with, those I don't, and be transparent about that.

Not long ago, hormone replacement therapy was very misunderstood. Recently, someone I know well consulted with her physician and was told, going on would be more risky than not because it’s been too long since menopause.

Other doctors are adamant that this is not the case. I’ll continue to bring them on. You DO have choices. One physician only has the experience they have and the degree to which they’re comfortable making changes in thoughts, information and actions …. Is the medical care you’ll receive from them.

I’d love to hear your response to this episode.

Resources:

5 Day Flip:

https://www.flippingfifty.com/5-day-challenge-new/

Discovery Call:

https://www.flippingfifty.com/wellness-coaching-for-life/

Ultimate Assessment:

https://www.flippingfifty.com/store/coaching-programs/private-coaching-90-min/

Other Episodes You Might Like:.

Can I Still Start Hormones 10 Years After Menopause? Doctors Respond:

https://www.flippingfifty.com/start-hormones-10-years-after-menopause/

One Thing I Would Change After 40 Years Working with Women in Menopause:

https://www.flippingfifty.com/working-with-women-in-menopause/

  continue reading

159 에피소드

모든 에피소드

×
 
Loading …

플레이어 FM에 오신것을 환영합니다!

플레이어 FM은 웹에서 고품질 팟캐스트를 검색하여 지금 바로 즐길 수 있도록 합니다. 최고의 팟캐스트 앱이며 Android, iPhone 및 웹에서도 작동합니다. 장치 간 구독 동기화를 위해 가입하세요.

 

빠른 참조 가이드