Player FM 앱으로 오프라인으로 전환하세요!
LW - Which LessWrong/Alignment topics would you like to be tutored in? [Poll] by Ruby
Fetch error
Hmmm there seems to be a problem fetching this series right now. Last successful fetch was on September 26, 2024 16:04 ()
What now? This series will be checked again in the next hour. If you believe it should be working, please verify the publisher's feed link below is valid and includes actual episode links. You can contact support to request the feed be immediately fetched.
Manage episode 440772621 series 2997284
Would you like to be tutored in applied game theory, natural latents, CFAR-style rationality techniques, "general AI x-risk", Agent Foundations, anthropic
s
, or some
other topics
discussed on LessWrong?
I'm thinking about prototyping some topic-specific LLM tutor bots, and would like to prioritize topics that multiple people are interested in.
Topic-specific LLM tutors would be customized with things like pre-loaded relevant context, helpful system prompts, and more focused testing to ensure they work.
Note: I'm interested in topics that are written about on LessWrong, e.g. infra-bayesianism, and
not
magnetohydrodynamics".
I'm going to use the same poll infrastructure that
Ben Pace pioneered
recently. There is a
thread below
where you add and vote on topics/domains/areas where you might like tutoring.
1. Karma: upvote/downvote to express enthusiasm about there being tutoring for a topic.
2. Reacts: click on the agree react to indicate you personally would like tutoring on a topic.
3. New Poll Option. Add a new topic for people express interest in being tutored on.
For the sake of this poll, I'm more interested in whether you'd like tutoring on a topic or not, separate from the question of whether you think a tutoring bot would be any good. I'll worry about that part.
Background
I've been playing around with LLMs a lot in the past couple of months and so far my favorite use case is tutoring. LLM-assistance is helpful via multiple routes such as providing background context with less effort than external search/reading, keeping me engaged via interactivity, generating examples, and breaking down complex sections into more digestible pieces.
Thanks for listening. To help us out with The Nonlinear Library or to learn more, please visit nonlinear.org
2447 에피소드
Fetch error
Hmmm there seems to be a problem fetching this series right now. Last successful fetch was on September 26, 2024 16:04 ()
What now? This series will be checked again in the next hour. If you believe it should be working, please verify the publisher's feed link below is valid and includes actual episode links. You can contact support to request the feed be immediately fetched.
Manage episode 440772621 series 2997284
Would you like to be tutored in applied game theory, natural latents, CFAR-style rationality techniques, "general AI x-risk", Agent Foundations, anthropic
s
, or some
other topics
discussed on LessWrong?
I'm thinking about prototyping some topic-specific LLM tutor bots, and would like to prioritize topics that multiple people are interested in.
Topic-specific LLM tutors would be customized with things like pre-loaded relevant context, helpful system prompts, and more focused testing to ensure they work.
Note: I'm interested in topics that are written about on LessWrong, e.g. infra-bayesianism, and
not
magnetohydrodynamics".
I'm going to use the same poll infrastructure that
Ben Pace pioneered
recently. There is a
thread below
where you add and vote on topics/domains/areas where you might like tutoring.
1. Karma: upvote/downvote to express enthusiasm about there being tutoring for a topic.
2. Reacts: click on the agree react to indicate you personally would like tutoring on a topic.
3. New Poll Option. Add a new topic for people express interest in being tutored on.
For the sake of this poll, I'm more interested in whether you'd like tutoring on a topic or not, separate from the question of whether you think a tutoring bot would be any good. I'll worry about that part.
Background
I've been playing around with LLMs a lot in the past couple of months and so far my favorite use case is tutoring. LLM-assistance is helpful via multiple routes such as providing background context with less effort than external search/reading, keeping me engaged via interactivity, generating examples, and breaking down complex sections into more digestible pieces.
Thanks for listening. To help us out with The Nonlinear Library or to learn more, please visit nonlinear.org
2447 에피소드
모든 에피소드
×플레이어 FM에 오신것을 환영합니다!
플레이어 FM은 웹에서 고품질 팟캐스트를 검색하여 지금 바로 즐길 수 있도록 합니다. 최고의 팟캐스트 앱이며 Android, iPhone 및 웹에서도 작동합니다. 장치 간 구독 동기화를 위해 가입하세요.