Artwork

Rachel Johnson and Katie Attwell, Rachel Johnson, and Katie Attwell에서 제공하는 콘텐츠입니다. 에피소드, 그래픽, 팟캐스트 설명을 포함한 모든 팟캐스트 콘텐츠는 Rachel Johnson and Katie Attwell, Rachel Johnson, and Katie Attwell 또는 해당 팟캐스트 플랫폼 파트너가 직접 업로드하고 제공합니다. 누군가가 귀하의 허락 없이 귀하의 저작물을 사용하고 있다고 생각되는 경우 여기에 설명된 절차를 따르실 수 있습니다 https://ko.player.fm/legal.
Player FM -팟 캐스트 앱
Player FM 앱으로 오프라인으로 전환하세요!

Rethinking Your Grading Scale - E122

25:49
 
공유
 

Manage episode 362222879 series 2800281
Rachel Johnson and Katie Attwell, Rachel Johnson, and Katie Attwell에서 제공하는 콘텐츠입니다. 에피소드, 그래픽, 팟캐스트 설명을 포함한 모든 팟캐스트 콘텐츠는 Rachel Johnson and Katie Attwell, Rachel Johnson, and Katie Attwell 또는 해당 팟캐스트 플랫폼 파트너가 직접 업로드하고 제공합니다. 누군가가 귀하의 허락 없이 귀하의 저작물을 사용하고 있다고 생각되는 경우 여기에 설명된 절차를 따르실 수 있습니다 https://ko.player.fm/legal.

This week, we are chatting all about the 100-point scale, why it is biased towards failure, and what we can do instead to make our grading a bit more biased-resistant.
If you like what you hear, we would love it if you could share this episode with a colleague or friend. And make sure you subscribe so that you don’t miss out on any new content! And consider supporting the show by buying us a coffee or two!
We would love to hear from you – leave a comment on our website OR check out our FLIPGRID!
Featured Content
**For detailed show notes, please visit our website at https://edugals.com/122**

  • Grading for Equity by Joe Feldman
  • 100-pt scale is biased towards failure
  • Zeroes disproportionately punishes students
  • Too many transitions points between grades (judgement between grades is much harder)
  • More inconsistencies of grading between teachers with 100-pt scale
  • Try using a scale with fewer points (0-4, 0-3, 0-5 for example)
  • Avoid marking everything - focus on summative tasks
  • Most recent, most consistent

Minimal Scales:

  • Decide how many transition points that you want
  • 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 point scales are all possibilities
  • Single point rubrics - criteria listed for level 3
  • Mastery scales (yes, no) - criteria listed for level 4 (3 attempts allowed because expectations are high)
  • Specifications Grading - E107
  • This is NOT watering the curriculum or grading down!
  • Multiple attempts or replacing grades as skills progress

Other suggestions:

  • Setting a minimum grade (40 or 50%) - essentially equalizes the grade bands to make grading more equitable
  • Using a 4 pt scale (or something similar), you will eventually need a grade conversion chart
  • Specific grades - 95, 85, 75, 65, etc. - pick specific values for each level
  • Think about your zeroes - is it compliance or comprehension?
  • Keep students accountable instead of using a zero

Determining Final Grades:

  • Eventually you will likely need to convert back to a 100-pt scale
  • Automatic conversions in gradebook software
  • Conferencing with students (along with reflections)
  • Most recent, most consistent - look for trends

Support the show

Connect with EduGals:

  continue reading

160 에피소드

Artwork
icon공유
 
Manage episode 362222879 series 2800281
Rachel Johnson and Katie Attwell, Rachel Johnson, and Katie Attwell에서 제공하는 콘텐츠입니다. 에피소드, 그래픽, 팟캐스트 설명을 포함한 모든 팟캐스트 콘텐츠는 Rachel Johnson and Katie Attwell, Rachel Johnson, and Katie Attwell 또는 해당 팟캐스트 플랫폼 파트너가 직접 업로드하고 제공합니다. 누군가가 귀하의 허락 없이 귀하의 저작물을 사용하고 있다고 생각되는 경우 여기에 설명된 절차를 따르실 수 있습니다 https://ko.player.fm/legal.

This week, we are chatting all about the 100-point scale, why it is biased towards failure, and what we can do instead to make our grading a bit more biased-resistant.
If you like what you hear, we would love it if you could share this episode with a colleague or friend. And make sure you subscribe so that you don’t miss out on any new content! And consider supporting the show by buying us a coffee or two!
We would love to hear from you – leave a comment on our website OR check out our FLIPGRID!
Featured Content
**For detailed show notes, please visit our website at https://edugals.com/122**

  • Grading for Equity by Joe Feldman
  • 100-pt scale is biased towards failure
  • Zeroes disproportionately punishes students
  • Too many transitions points between grades (judgement between grades is much harder)
  • More inconsistencies of grading between teachers with 100-pt scale
  • Try using a scale with fewer points (0-4, 0-3, 0-5 for example)
  • Avoid marking everything - focus on summative tasks
  • Most recent, most consistent

Minimal Scales:

  • Decide how many transition points that you want
  • 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 point scales are all possibilities
  • Single point rubrics - criteria listed for level 3
  • Mastery scales (yes, no) - criteria listed for level 4 (3 attempts allowed because expectations are high)
  • Specifications Grading - E107
  • This is NOT watering the curriculum or grading down!
  • Multiple attempts or replacing grades as skills progress

Other suggestions:

  • Setting a minimum grade (40 or 50%) - essentially equalizes the grade bands to make grading more equitable
  • Using a 4 pt scale (or something similar), you will eventually need a grade conversion chart
  • Specific grades - 95, 85, 75, 65, etc. - pick specific values for each level
  • Think about your zeroes - is it compliance or comprehension?
  • Keep students accountable instead of using a zero

Determining Final Grades:

  • Eventually you will likely need to convert back to a 100-pt scale
  • Automatic conversions in gradebook software
  • Conferencing with students (along with reflections)
  • Most recent, most consistent - look for trends

Support the show

Connect with EduGals:

  continue reading

160 에피소드

All episodes

×
 
Loading …

플레이어 FM에 오신것을 환영합니다!

플레이어 FM은 웹에서 고품질 팟캐스트를 검색하여 지금 바로 즐길 수 있도록 합니다. 최고의 팟캐스트 앱이며 Android, iPhone 및 웹에서도 작동합니다. 장치 간 구독 동기화를 위해 가입하세요.

 

빠른 참조 가이드

탐색하는 동안 이 프로그램을 들어보세요.
재생