Will AI Take All the Jobs? Jacob Andra and Stephen Karafiath Say No

The Applied AI Podcast

Send us a text

While people fear wholesale workforce replacement, the actual transformation is far more complex and ultimately more optimistic for organizations willing to adapt strategically.

This episode cuts through the hype to examine three distinct zones of AI capability. First, tasks where AI excels at things humans never could do well, like fraud detection algorithms or protein folding analysis. Second, uniquely human domains like relationship building and creative problem solving across diverse contexts. And third, the contested middle ground where AI augments but doesn't replace human workers.

Jacob and Stephen share real insights from Talbot West's consulting work, including an aerospace manufacturer case where their top recommendation wasn't an AI solution at all. It was hiring a human to orchestrate digital transformation across departments. This reveals a fundamental truth: the future isn't humans versus AI. It's humans working with AI as force multipliers.

Large language models get conflated with AI itself, but they represent one narrow slice of available technology. They excel within certain domains but fail catastrophically when pushed beyond those boundaries. That's why Talbot West pursues two complementary approaches to expand AI capabilities beyond current LLM limitations.

Neurosymbolic AI combines neural networks with symbolic logic structures. Think of AlphaGo, which paired a neural network exploring game possibilities with a mathematical language enforcing the rules. The neural component provides creativity and pattern matching. The symbolic structure keeps everything grounded in reality and prevents hallucinations.

Cognitive Hive AI takes a different approach by orchestrating multiple specialized AI modules into coordinated systems. A single large language model might serve as just one small component, perhaps handling translation between machine language and human users. Other modules handle specific tasks like sentiment analysis, predictive analytics, or compliance monitoring. Together, they create business capabilities no single AI could achieve alone.

The MIT study claiming 95% of AI projects fail to see ROI likely reflects implementations that lacked this level of strategic thinking. When you bring proper analysis and architecture to AI deployment, returns become inevitable. Talbot West's customer feedback suggests near-universal satisfaction when projects are scoped correctly from the start.

Organizations face a choice in how to handle this productivity multiplier. The short-term approach fires people and maintains current output with fewer workers. The strategic approach keeps the workforce intact and uses AI augmentation to scale operations dramatically without proportional headcount increases. Companies taking the second path position themselves for massive competitive advantage.

This gets incredibly nuanced when you consider all the variables at play. Different job types face different displacement risks. Various AI technologies have different strengths and limitations. Neurosymbolic systems excel at different tasks than ensemble architectures. Single machine learning algorithms solve different problems than large language models. Understanding these distinctions matters enormously when planning organizational transformation.

You absolutely need humans in your company, but the nature of their work will shift. AI involvement will vary dramatically across roles from 1% to 100% depending on the specific tasks and available technology. Success requires bringing rigorous analysis to determine exactly where and how AI augments your workforce.

Learn more about Talbot West's approach to AI implementation: https://talbotwest.com