Artwork

Reliability.FM, Reliability.FM: Accendo Reliability, and Focused on improving your reliability program에서 제공하는 콘텐츠입니다. 에피소드, 그래픽, 팟캐스트 설명을 포함한 모든 팟캐스트 콘텐츠는 Reliability.FM, Reliability.FM: Accendo Reliability, and Focused on improving your reliability program 또는 해당 팟캐스트 플랫폼 파트너가 직접 업로드하고 제공합니다. 누군가가 귀하의 허락 없이 귀하의 저작물을 사용하고 있다고 생각되는 경우 여기에 설명된 절차를 따르실 수 있습니다 https://ko.player.fm/legal.
Player FM -팟 캐스트 앱
Player FM 앱으로 오프라인으로 전환하세요!

Calculate Equipment Reliability

 
공유
 

Manage episode 450326665 series 2359263
Reliability.FM, Reliability.FM: Accendo Reliability, and Focused on improving your reliability program에서 제공하는 콘텐츠입니다. 에피소드, 그래픽, 팟캐스트 설명을 포함한 모든 팟캐스트 콘텐츠는 Reliability.FM, Reliability.FM: Accendo Reliability, and Focused on improving your reliability program 또는 해당 팟캐스트 플랫폼 파트너가 직접 업로드하고 제공합니다. 누군가가 귀하의 허락 없이 귀하의 저작물을 사용하고 있다고 생각되는 경우 여기에 설명된 절차를 따르실 수 있습니다 https://ko.player.fm/legal.

Calculate Equipment Reliability

Abstract

Chris and Fred discuss how we can go about calculating equipment reliability … when you only have a small amount of information. Help!

Key Points

Join Chris and Fred as they discuss how you can calculate equipment reliability when you have a little bit of information. This comes from a listener who asked us to calculate the reliability of their equipment that failed four times in one month (with 400 hours of operation). How do we find this system’s reliability?

Topics include:

  • So what is the number? If we assume a constant hazard rate (yuck) then we can use the exponential distribution to work out that the reliability at one month (400 hours) is 1.8 %.
  • Is this helpful? Our listener didn’t tell us why they wanted a reliability number … but 1.8 % is almost certainly useless in terms of making better decisions. Why? Well we don’t know if our equipment is wearing in or wearing out. We don’t know if we have 10 pieces of equipment working at the same time over this month, with only 4 of them failing. So what do we do?
  • What is the DECISION? This is a common question (refrain). What are you deciding to do with this number? We can’t think of a single decision that this 1.8 % estimate will help. Again, we don’t know if the equipment is wearing in or wearing out … which would affect our estimate. Knowing the precise times of failure would be really helpful as well. But is the decision more useful if it is based on availability? It sounds like the equipment is being repaired, so how long does it spend being repaired? What is the DECISION!
  • Don’t just stick with numbers … look for WHY? Are you doing root cause analysis (RCA)? If you can (for example) quickly identify that the four failures were caused by incorrect startup procedures, and a quick change to those procedures would make the problems go away … fix it! Stop doing statistics on numbers you can make go away.

Enjoy an episode of Speaking of Reliability. Where you can join friends as they discuss reliability topics. Join us as we discuss topics ranging from design for reliability techniques to field data analysis approaches.



Show Notes

The post SOR 1018 Calculate Equipment Reliability appeared first on Accendo Reliability.

  continue reading

676 에피소드

Artwork
icon공유
 
Manage episode 450326665 series 2359263
Reliability.FM, Reliability.FM: Accendo Reliability, and Focused on improving your reliability program에서 제공하는 콘텐츠입니다. 에피소드, 그래픽, 팟캐스트 설명을 포함한 모든 팟캐스트 콘텐츠는 Reliability.FM, Reliability.FM: Accendo Reliability, and Focused on improving your reliability program 또는 해당 팟캐스트 플랫폼 파트너가 직접 업로드하고 제공합니다. 누군가가 귀하의 허락 없이 귀하의 저작물을 사용하고 있다고 생각되는 경우 여기에 설명된 절차를 따르실 수 있습니다 https://ko.player.fm/legal.

Calculate Equipment Reliability

Abstract

Chris and Fred discuss how we can go about calculating equipment reliability … when you only have a small amount of information. Help!

Key Points

Join Chris and Fred as they discuss how you can calculate equipment reliability when you have a little bit of information. This comes from a listener who asked us to calculate the reliability of their equipment that failed four times in one month (with 400 hours of operation). How do we find this system’s reliability?

Topics include:

  • So what is the number? If we assume a constant hazard rate (yuck) then we can use the exponential distribution to work out that the reliability at one month (400 hours) is 1.8 %.
  • Is this helpful? Our listener didn’t tell us why they wanted a reliability number … but 1.8 % is almost certainly useless in terms of making better decisions. Why? Well we don’t know if our equipment is wearing in or wearing out. We don’t know if we have 10 pieces of equipment working at the same time over this month, with only 4 of them failing. So what do we do?
  • What is the DECISION? This is a common question (refrain). What are you deciding to do with this number? We can’t think of a single decision that this 1.8 % estimate will help. Again, we don’t know if the equipment is wearing in or wearing out … which would affect our estimate. Knowing the precise times of failure would be really helpful as well. But is the decision more useful if it is based on availability? It sounds like the equipment is being repaired, so how long does it spend being repaired? What is the DECISION!
  • Don’t just stick with numbers … look for WHY? Are you doing root cause analysis (RCA)? If you can (for example) quickly identify that the four failures were caused by incorrect startup procedures, and a quick change to those procedures would make the problems go away … fix it! Stop doing statistics on numbers you can make go away.

Enjoy an episode of Speaking of Reliability. Where you can join friends as they discuss reliability topics. Join us as we discuss topics ranging from design for reliability techniques to field data analysis approaches.



Show Notes

The post SOR 1018 Calculate Equipment Reliability appeared first on Accendo Reliability.

  continue reading

676 에피소드

모든 에피소드

×
 
Loading …

플레이어 FM에 오신것을 환영합니다!

플레이어 FM은 웹에서 고품질 팟캐스트를 검색하여 지금 바로 즐길 수 있도록 합니다. 최고의 팟캐스트 앱이며 Android, iPhone 및 웹에서도 작동합니다. 장치 간 구독 동기화를 위해 가입하세요.

 

빠른 참조 가이드