))
Do your tools fit your real needs? - Mesut Durukal
Manage episode 512498381 series 3682604
Richard Seidl | Software Development & Testing Expert, Richard Seidl | Software Development, and Testing Expert에서 제공하는 콘텐츠입니다. 에피소드, 그래픽, 팟캐스트 설명을 포함한 모든 팟캐스트 콘텐츠는 Richard Seidl | Software Development & Testing Expert, Richard Seidl | Software Development, and Testing Expert 또는 해당 팟캐스트 플랫폼 파트너가 직접 업로드하고 제공합니다. 누군가가 귀하의 허락 없이 귀하의 저작물을 사용하고 있다고 생각되는 경우 여기에 설명된 절차를 따르실 수 있습니다 https://ko.player.fm/legal.
Switching End-to-End Test Automation Frameworks: Lessons from Real-World Projects
…
continue reading
Bonus Tipp: Never miss a crucial test again
"Because if we go with wrong tools or wrong alternatives like libraries, frameworks, whatever we are using in our environment or ecosystem, then we might not be able to cover everything that we are supposed to do." - Mesut Durukal
In this episode, I talk with Mesut Durukal about picking the right end to end test automation framework. Mesut shares why tool choice must serve real needs, not trends. It is a mindset shift from hype to needs. In his case users were on Safari, the team tool did not run there. He mapped needs, compared Cypress, Playwright, Selenium, TestCafe, and Nightwatch, and chose Playwright for speed and broad browser support. We talk about reporting, debugging, and docs. We touch on architecture, like keeping login and helpers outside specs, so migration stays clean. For me, this is tech with agility. Know your goals, grow your system, and review choices often.
Mesut has over 15 years of experience in areas such as industrial automation, IoT, cloud services and defense industry, complemented by his expertise in test automation and CI/CD integration. He has held multiple roles in multinational projects including Quality Owner and Hiring Manager and is well versed in CMMI, Scrum & PMP. As a recognized speaker on international stages and winner of the award for the best presentation, he is also involved in various program committees.
Highlights:
- Choose automation tools based on real needs, not hype.
- Match browser support to your users, Safari included.
- Evaluate frameworks with clear criteria across Cypress, Playwright, Selenium, TestCafe, and Nightwatch.
- Playwright delivered speed and broad cross browser coverage for the team.
- Modular tests with shared helpers simplify maintenance and migration.
챕터
1. Choosing the Right Testing Framework (00:00:00)
2. Automation's Role in QA Tools (00:03:24)
3. Quality Assurance in Web Applications (00:06:47)
4. Cypress vs. Playwright: Key Differences (00:12:27)
5. Choosing a Testing Framework Depends (00:15:44)
6. Reusable Functions in Automation Frameworks (00:17:55)
7. Embracing Continuous Improvement (00:20:22)
27 에피소드
공유
