Artwork

Doug Passon에서 제공하는 콘텐츠입니다. 에피소드, 그래픽, 팟캐스트 설명을 포함한 모든 팟캐스트 콘텐츠는 Doug Passon 또는 해당 팟캐스트 플랫폼 파트너가 직접 업로드하고 제공합니다. 누군가가 귀하의 허락 없이 귀하의 저작물을 사용하고 있다고 생각되는 경우 여기에 설명된 절차를 따르실 수 있습니다 https://ko.player.fm/legal.
Player FM -팟 캐스트 앱
Player FM 앱으로 오프라인으로 전환하세요!

Acquitted Conduct Revisited: Mmmmm... Flavors of Evil

1:20:41
 
공유
 

Manage episode 407259749 series 3562356
Doug Passon에서 제공하는 콘텐츠입니다. 에피소드, 그래픽, 팟캐스트 설명을 포함한 모든 팟캐스트 콘텐츠는 Doug Passon 또는 해당 팟캐스트 플랫폼 파트너가 직접 업로드하고 제공합니다. 누군가가 귀하의 허락 없이 귀하의 저작물을 사용하고 있다고 생각되는 경우 여기에 설명된 절차를 따르실 수 있습니다 https://ko.player.fm/legal.

If you wanna feel really dim, spend an hour or so trying to debate the fine points of federal constitutional law with Prof. Doug Berman and Mark Allenbaugh. We had to come back to the issue of how the guidelines condone using charges where a client goes to trial and a jury finds her not guilty, against them at a later sentencing proceeding.

The Supreme Court had the opportunity to strike down this constitutionally offensive practice, but punted to the sentencing commission. They currently have no plans to address it, so reach out to them and tell them to do it!

Today, though, the most spirited debate focused on the distiction between "acquitted conduct" and "relevant" or "uncharged" conduct.

If you’re not a lawyer, this bare-knuckle brawl between two legal giants and the 5th and 6th Amendments may be a pass for you. Or maybe you’ll love it just because of all the screaming.

All I know, is 1) the debate is really important 2) I love spending time with these gentlemen, and 3) you need to reach out to the sentencing commission to get them to settle this shit once and for all.

Ding, Ding.

IN THIS EPISODE:

  • Whether a client should have right to demand that a JURY make the determination as to whether certain sentence enhancements apply;
  • Whether the burden of proof should be beyond a reasonable doubt for sentencing enhancements;
  • Whether there is any meaningful constitutional distinction, between acquitted and uncharged conduct;
  • Whether statutory ranges are too broad, allowing punishment to be untethered to counts of conviction;
  • What can we do about all of it?

RELATED EPISODES & LINKS:

Mark Allenbaugh & Alan Ellis - LAW 360 Article: Supreme Court Must End Acquitted Conduct Sentencing, July 19, 2023.

Contact the Sentencing Commission!

https://www.ussc.gov/

Ep. 36: Presumed Guilty: Using Acquitted Conduct at Sentencing:

https://setforsentencing.com/podcast/acquitted-conduct/

Berman’s Sentencing Law and Policy Blog:

https://sentencing.typepad.com/sentencing_law_and_policy/

Mark Allenbaugh: www.sentencingstats.com

  continue reading

102 에피소드

Artwork
icon공유
 
Manage episode 407259749 series 3562356
Doug Passon에서 제공하는 콘텐츠입니다. 에피소드, 그래픽, 팟캐스트 설명을 포함한 모든 팟캐스트 콘텐츠는 Doug Passon 또는 해당 팟캐스트 플랫폼 파트너가 직접 업로드하고 제공합니다. 누군가가 귀하의 허락 없이 귀하의 저작물을 사용하고 있다고 생각되는 경우 여기에 설명된 절차를 따르실 수 있습니다 https://ko.player.fm/legal.

If you wanna feel really dim, spend an hour or so trying to debate the fine points of federal constitutional law with Prof. Doug Berman and Mark Allenbaugh. We had to come back to the issue of how the guidelines condone using charges where a client goes to trial and a jury finds her not guilty, against them at a later sentencing proceeding.

The Supreme Court had the opportunity to strike down this constitutionally offensive practice, but punted to the sentencing commission. They currently have no plans to address it, so reach out to them and tell them to do it!

Today, though, the most spirited debate focused on the distiction between "acquitted conduct" and "relevant" or "uncharged" conduct.

If you’re not a lawyer, this bare-knuckle brawl between two legal giants and the 5th and 6th Amendments may be a pass for you. Or maybe you’ll love it just because of all the screaming.

All I know, is 1) the debate is really important 2) I love spending time with these gentlemen, and 3) you need to reach out to the sentencing commission to get them to settle this shit once and for all.

Ding, Ding.

IN THIS EPISODE:

  • Whether a client should have right to demand that a JURY make the determination as to whether certain sentence enhancements apply;
  • Whether the burden of proof should be beyond a reasonable doubt for sentencing enhancements;
  • Whether there is any meaningful constitutional distinction, between acquitted and uncharged conduct;
  • Whether statutory ranges are too broad, allowing punishment to be untethered to counts of conviction;
  • What can we do about all of it?

RELATED EPISODES & LINKS:

Mark Allenbaugh & Alan Ellis - LAW 360 Article: Supreme Court Must End Acquitted Conduct Sentencing, July 19, 2023.

Contact the Sentencing Commission!

https://www.ussc.gov/

Ep. 36: Presumed Guilty: Using Acquitted Conduct at Sentencing:

https://setforsentencing.com/podcast/acquitted-conduct/

Berman’s Sentencing Law and Policy Blog:

https://sentencing.typepad.com/sentencing_law_and_policy/

Mark Allenbaugh: www.sentencingstats.com

  continue reading

102 에피소드

모든 에피소드

×
 
Loading …

플레이어 FM에 오신것을 환영합니다!

플레이어 FM은 웹에서 고품질 팟캐스트를 검색하여 지금 바로 즐길 수 있도록 합니다. 최고의 팟캐스트 앱이며 Android, iPhone 및 웹에서도 작동합니다. 장치 간 구독 동기화를 위해 가입하세요.

 

빠른 참조 가이드