))
E18. The Problem with 80% Accuracy in 3 of 4 Trials
Manage episode 503696507 series 3657953
Stephanie DeLussey에서 제공하는 콘텐츠입니다. 에피소드, 그래픽, 팟캐스트 설명을 포함한 모든 팟캐스트 콘텐츠는 Stephanie DeLussey 또는 해당 팟캐스트 플랫폼 파트너가 직접 업로드하고 제공합니다. 누군가가 귀하의 허락 없이 귀하의 저작물을 사용하고 있다고 생각되는 경우 여기에 설명된 절차를 따르실 수 있습니다 https://ko.player.fm/legal.
That phrase on IEPs — “80% accuracy in 3 out of 4 trials” — doesn’t actually measure mastery. On today's episode, Stephanie breaks down why this one-size-fits-all approach is a red flag, what it does to your data, and how to write mastery criteria that actually matter.
You’ll get real examples, reflection questions, and strategies for creating goals that guide instruction and track meaningful progress.
Here’s what you’ll learn:
- Why “80% in 3 out of 4 trials” is vague and ineffective
- How mastery criteria impacts data collection and reporting
- Key questions to consider before writing any goal
- Examples of clear, actionable mastery criteria that reflect student needs
Writing clear, intentional mastery criteria changes everything: it guides instruction, aligns the team, makes data meaningful, and ensures every goal has impact. If your goals aren’t doing that, it’s time to rethink them — for every student, every skill, every day.
And don’t forget — you can get 50% off your first month of membership https://products.theintentionaliep.com/tii-membership-50off1stmonth-podcast/
For more information, check out more of Stephanie's resources:
https://www.theintentionaliep.com/the-intentional-iep-book/
https://www.theintentionaliep.com/
24 에피소드
공유
