Player FM 앱으로 오프라인으로 전환하세요!
A Conversation with Professor Robert Yeh
Manage episode 375486663 series 3506483
Here is the profile for Harvard Professor Robert (Bobby) Yeh.
His most recent Circulation paper: Bringing the Credibility Revolution to Observational Research in Cardiology.
We referenced a paper by Professor Miguel Hernan: The C-Word: Scientific Euphemisms Do Not Improve Causal Inference From Observational Data
Paper referenced on left ventricular assist devices: Comparative Effectiveness of Percutaneous Microaxial Left Ventricular Assist Device vs Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump or No Mechanical Circulatory Support in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock
Sensible Medicine is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support our work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
I learned a lot from this conversation. One of the main lessons is that no matter how well the authors avoid causal language, the intent of an observational comparison study is causal. And if that is so, the main thrust of these efforts ought to be simulate, as close as possible, a randomized clinical trial.
One of my favorite parts of our chat was Bobby’s now famous explanation of immortal time bias using Cheetos.
Let us know what you think. I hope to do more of these types of conversations.
JMM
This is a public episode. If you’d like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.sensible-med.com/subscribe
79 에피소드
Manage episode 375486663 series 3506483
Here is the profile for Harvard Professor Robert (Bobby) Yeh.
His most recent Circulation paper: Bringing the Credibility Revolution to Observational Research in Cardiology.
We referenced a paper by Professor Miguel Hernan: The C-Word: Scientific Euphemisms Do Not Improve Causal Inference From Observational Data
Paper referenced on left ventricular assist devices: Comparative Effectiveness of Percutaneous Microaxial Left Ventricular Assist Device vs Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump or No Mechanical Circulatory Support in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock
Sensible Medicine is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support our work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
I learned a lot from this conversation. One of the main lessons is that no matter how well the authors avoid causal language, the intent of an observational comparison study is causal. And if that is so, the main thrust of these efforts ought to be simulate, as close as possible, a randomized clinical trial.
One of my favorite parts of our chat was Bobby’s now famous explanation of immortal time bias using Cheetos.
Let us know what you think. I hope to do more of these types of conversations.
JMM
This is a public episode. If you’d like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.sensible-med.com/subscribe
79 에피소드
Tous les épisodes
×플레이어 FM에 오신것을 환영합니다!
플레이어 FM은 웹에서 고품질 팟캐스트를 검색하여 지금 바로 즐길 수 있도록 합니다. 최고의 팟캐스트 앱이며 Android, iPhone 및 웹에서도 작동합니다. 장치 간 구독 동기화를 위해 가입하세요.