What We Know (and Don’t) About Modern Code Reviews

Programming Tech Brief By HackerNoon

HackerNoon에서 제공하는 콘텐츠입니다. 에피소드, 그래픽, 팟캐스트 설명을 포함한 모든 팟캐스트 콘텐츠는 HackerNoon 또는 해당 팟캐스트 플랫폼 파트너가 직접 업로드하고 제공합니다. 누군가가 귀하의 허락 없이 귀하의 저작물을 사용하고 있다고 생각되는 경우 여기에 설명된 절차를 따르실 수 있습니다 https://ko.player.fm/legal.

4d ago 15:13

MP3•에피소드 홈

This story was originally published on HackerNoon at: https://hackernoon.com/what-we-know-and-dont-about-modern-code-reviews.
A deep review of modern code review research, its evolution, key themes, and the growing gap between academic findings and practitioner needs.
Check more stories related to programming at: https://hackernoon.com/c/programming. You can also check exclusive content about #code-review, #code-review-research, #developer-workflow, #code-review-tools, #peer-code-review, #software-quality-assurance, #empirical-software-engineering, #software-engineering-research, and more.
This story was written by: @codereview. Learn more about this writer by checking @codereview's about page, and for more stories, please visit hackernoon.com.
This article traces the evolution of modern code review from formal inspections to tool-driven workflows, maps key research themes, and highlights a critical gap: how practitioners actually perceive and use MCR research. By pairing a systematic literature review with a practitioner survey, it surfaces where academic focus aligns—or clashes—with real-world software development practice.