Artwork

Larry Tribble, Ph.D. and Larry Tribble에서 제공하는 콘텐츠입니다. 에피소드, 그래픽, 팟캐스트 설명을 포함한 모든 팟캐스트 콘텐츠는 Larry Tribble, Ph.D. and Larry Tribble 또는 해당 팟캐스트 플랫폼 파트너가 직접 업로드하고 제공합니다. 누군가가 귀하의 허락 없이 귀하의 저작물을 사용하고 있다고 생각되는 경우 여기에 설명된 절차를 따르실 수 있습니다 https://ko.player.fm/legal.
Player FM -팟 캐스트 앱
Player FM 앱으로 오프라인으로 전환하세요!

Watch Out For The Three 'Micro' Wastes of Productivity - DBR 078

51:09
 
공유
 

Manage episode 480434724 series 3562406
Larry Tribble, Ph.D. and Larry Tribble에서 제공하는 콘텐츠입니다. 에피소드, 그래픽, 팟캐스트 설명을 포함한 모든 팟캐스트 콘텐츠는 Larry Tribble, Ph.D. and Larry Tribble 또는 해당 팟캐스트 플랫폼 파트너가 직접 업로드하고 제공합니다. 누군가가 귀하의 허락 없이 귀하의 저작물을 사용하고 있다고 생각되는 경우 여기에 설명된 절차를 따르실 수 있습니다 https://ko.player.fm/legal.
I want to describe calm productivity. And I want to contrast the results of attention management to the results of efforts to do time management. I’m going to take you over to a recording of a public talk I did at a conference at UA. It’s titled: "The Three Enemies of Productivity". The actual thing that we all want is productivity or efficiency (which are probably synonyms, for the most part). Productivity and efficiency both mean outputs per unit input. When we talk about productivity, we typically think of outputs per unit time. On the other hand, when we're talking about organizational productivity we may be talking about maximizing output per dollar cost or other things. But when we talk about individual productivity, personal productivity and knowledge work, then typically we're going to wind up talking about maximizing results per unit time. And that's fine. But maximization of that is not a “flow” state. It is not calm productivity. It’s “hurry culture”. The equations come from physical product studies
  • Physical product is not variable
  • Delivery mechanisms are critical in knowledge work because information must be comprehensible
  • Part of the product is this comprehensibility
  • Less so in the physical product world
  • Implications of the physical-product-based efficiency equations
How this plays in “time” management
  • The first thing is to get rid of waste
  • The notion of “wasting time” is challenging - many things LOOK like waste.
  • So, we try to shrink time. But “speeding up” is bad for us, although “less time” is often good.
  • Poor utilization of the asset (downtime) is the first waste.
We've got to understand what the asset is
  • What's being challenged for us is not exactly our time.
  • It's our attention. And, there's lots of ways that our attention could be wasted.
There is no real way to ‘overclock’
  • If I can make you go faster than you're comfortable going, then you're going to start making mistakes.
  • Trying to make somebody go faster than they can is the result of a focus on time management.
  • In the extreme, rushing to make time efficient is cutting corners
  • Rushing does nothing to give us a sense of of calm, and peaceful.
Macro waste of attention
  • I don't Talk about macro waste. Use the Covey quadrants.
  • We can't be Attention intensive for 8, 10, or 12 hours a day.
“Losing” our attention
  • We don't yet know what "leaves" when we lose our focus.
  • An example of talking about attention in the wrong way
Micro wastes of attention.
  • Task switching has an enormous cost in attention.
  • Two reasons for focus
The three primary 'micro' wastes of attention (the Keynote)
  • Interruption
  • Multitasking
  • Distraction
  • ...and how to deal with them
I enjoy giving this keynote. It helps me spread the message about the core of productivity. If you know someone who needs to hear it, share or get them in touch with me for a keynote. www.linkedin.com/in/larrytribble [email protected]
  continue reading

100 에피소드

Artwork
icon공유
 
Manage episode 480434724 series 3562406
Larry Tribble, Ph.D. and Larry Tribble에서 제공하는 콘텐츠입니다. 에피소드, 그래픽, 팟캐스트 설명을 포함한 모든 팟캐스트 콘텐츠는 Larry Tribble, Ph.D. and Larry Tribble 또는 해당 팟캐스트 플랫폼 파트너가 직접 업로드하고 제공합니다. 누군가가 귀하의 허락 없이 귀하의 저작물을 사용하고 있다고 생각되는 경우 여기에 설명된 절차를 따르실 수 있습니다 https://ko.player.fm/legal.
I want to describe calm productivity. And I want to contrast the results of attention management to the results of efforts to do time management. I’m going to take you over to a recording of a public talk I did at a conference at UA. It’s titled: "The Three Enemies of Productivity". The actual thing that we all want is productivity or efficiency (which are probably synonyms, for the most part). Productivity and efficiency both mean outputs per unit input. When we talk about productivity, we typically think of outputs per unit time. On the other hand, when we're talking about organizational productivity we may be talking about maximizing output per dollar cost or other things. But when we talk about individual productivity, personal productivity and knowledge work, then typically we're going to wind up talking about maximizing results per unit time. And that's fine. But maximization of that is not a “flow” state. It is not calm productivity. It’s “hurry culture”. The equations come from physical product studies
  • Physical product is not variable
  • Delivery mechanisms are critical in knowledge work because information must be comprehensible
  • Part of the product is this comprehensibility
  • Less so in the physical product world
  • Implications of the physical-product-based efficiency equations
How this plays in “time” management
  • The first thing is to get rid of waste
  • The notion of “wasting time” is challenging - many things LOOK like waste.
  • So, we try to shrink time. But “speeding up” is bad for us, although “less time” is often good.
  • Poor utilization of the asset (downtime) is the first waste.
We've got to understand what the asset is
  • What's being challenged for us is not exactly our time.
  • It's our attention. And, there's lots of ways that our attention could be wasted.
There is no real way to ‘overclock’
  • If I can make you go faster than you're comfortable going, then you're going to start making mistakes.
  • Trying to make somebody go faster than they can is the result of a focus on time management.
  • In the extreme, rushing to make time efficient is cutting corners
  • Rushing does nothing to give us a sense of of calm, and peaceful.
Macro waste of attention
  • I don't Talk about macro waste. Use the Covey quadrants.
  • We can't be Attention intensive for 8, 10, or 12 hours a day.
“Losing” our attention
  • We don't yet know what "leaves" when we lose our focus.
  • An example of talking about attention in the wrong way
Micro wastes of attention.
  • Task switching has an enormous cost in attention.
  • Two reasons for focus
The three primary 'micro' wastes of attention (the Keynote)
  • Interruption
  • Multitasking
  • Distraction
  • ...and how to deal with them
I enjoy giving this keynote. It helps me spread the message about the core of productivity. If you know someone who needs to hear it, share or get them in touch with me for a keynote. www.linkedin.com/in/larrytribble [email protected]
  continue reading

100 에피소드

모든 에피소드

×
 
Loading …

플레이어 FM에 오신것을 환영합니다!

플레이어 FM은 웹에서 고품질 팟캐스트를 검색하여 지금 바로 즐길 수 있도록 합니다. 최고의 팟캐스트 앱이며 Android, iPhone 및 웹에서도 작동합니다. 장치 간 구독 동기화를 위해 가입하세요.

 

빠른 참조 가이드

탐색하는 동안 이 프로그램을 들어보세요.
재생