Divided Argument podcast

Artwork

Politics News Government Dan Epps Law Supreme Court Baude And Dan Epps Baude Supreme Court Of The United States Us Supreme Court Supreme Court Justices Constitution Constitutional Law SCOTUS Legal

Player FM - Internet Radio Done Right

44 subscribers

추가했습니다 four 년 전

Will Baude & Dan Epps, Will Baude, and Dan Epps에서 제공하는 콘텐츠입니다. 에피소드, 그래픽, 팟캐스트 설명을 포함한 모든 팟캐스트 콘텐츠는 Will Baude & Dan Epps, Will Baude, and Dan Epps 또는 해당 팟캐스트 플랫폼 파트너가 직접 업로드하고 제공합니다. 누군가가 귀하의 허락 없이 귀하의 저작물을 사용하고 있다고 생각되는 경우 여기에 설명된 절차를 따르실 수 있습니다 https://ko.player.fm/legal.

T

The Unshakeables

The Unshakeables podcast artwork

The Unshakeables podcast artwork

1
Inspiring Creativity & Community: CultureCon 35:06

18일 전35:06

나중에 재생

나중에 재생

35:06

Imani Ellis has always believed community is a superpower. What began as a small gathering in her Harlem apartment grew into The Creative Collective NYC and CultureCon — one of the largest conferences celebrating creators of color. But behind the highlight reels and celebrity speakers, Imani’s journey has been defined by burnout, bold leaps and learning when to pause. In this episode, Ben and Kathleen sit down with Imani and explore what it takes to transform a passion project into a cultural movement. From balancing a demanding career at NBCUniversal with late-night CultureCon planning, to walking away from work at the height of burnout for a self-designed “creative residency” in Paris, Imani shares the realities of leadership, rest and why joy and community must stay at the center of her work. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.…

Divided Argument

공유

시리즈 홈•Feed

Will Baude & Dan Epps, Will Baude, and Dan Epps에서 제공하는 콘텐츠입니다. 에피소드, 그래픽, 팟캐스트 설명을 포함한 모든 팟캐스트 콘텐츠는 Will Baude & Dan Epps, Will Baude, and Dan Epps 또는 해당 팟캐스트 플랫폼 파트너가 직접 업로드하고 제공합니다. 누군가가 귀하의 허락 없이 귀하의 저작물을 사용하고 있다고 생각되는 경우 여기에 설명된 절차를 따르실 수 있습니다 https://ko.player.fm/legal.

An unscheduled, unpredictable Supreme Court podcast. Hosted by Will Baude and Dan Epps.

… continue reading

110 에피소드

#Politics #News #Government #Dan Epps #Law #Supreme Court #Baude And Dan Epps #Baude #Supreme Court Of The United States #Us Supreme Court #Supreme Court Justices #Constitution #Constitutional Law #SCOTUS #Legal

Artwork

Divided Argument

44 subscribers

updated 15일 전

공유

시리즈 홈•Feed

Will Baude & Dan Epps, Will Baude, and Dan Epps에서 제공하는 콘텐츠입니다. 에피소드, 그래픽, 팟캐스트 설명을 포함한 모든 팟캐스트 콘텐츠는 Will Baude & Dan Epps, Will Baude, and Dan Epps 또는 해당 팟캐스트 플랫폼 파트너가 직접 업로드하고 제공합니다. 누군가가 귀하의 허락 없이 귀하의 저작물을 사용하고 있다고 생각되는 경우 여기에 설명된 절차를 따르실 수 있습니다 https://ko.player.fm/legal.

An unscheduled, unpredictable Supreme Court podcast. Hosted by Will Baude and Dan Epps.

… continue reading

110 에피소드

#Politics #News #Government #Dan Epps #Law #Supreme Court #Baude And Dan Epps #Baude #Supreme Court Of The United States #Us Supreme Court #Supreme Court Justices #Constitution #Constitutional Law #SCOTUS #Legal

모든 에피소드

×

1
Crazy Half-Drunk Unreliable Research Assistant 1:03:41

15일 전1:03:41

나중에 재생

나중에 재생

1:03:41

Divided Argument is in its sixth season! Our first episode of the term focuses, of course, on the latest developments on the shadow docket. These include several grants of interim relief to the Trump administration, as well as some dissents from the denial of certiorari. But first, an update on Dan's travel schedule and ChatGPT usage, and an important correction to our previous episode.…

1
Proust or Plato 52:35

6 weeks 전52:35

나중에 재생

나중에 재생

52:35

For the season finale, we're joined by Yale law professor Justin Driver to talk about his new book, "The Fall of Affirmative Action: Race, the Supreme Court, and the Future of Higher Education." We discuss the conservative cases for and against affirmative action, the post-SFFA world of university admissions, the promise and limits of colorblindness, and the effects of admissions policies on students' sense of belonging.…

1
Byzantine Wall 1:16:51

9 weeks 전1:16:51

나중에 재생

나중에 재생

1:16:51

We extend our record-breaking run with a discussion of the Court's two big recent emergency docket rulings: Noem v. Vasquez Perdomo and NIH v. American Public Health Association .

1
Bedrock Con Law 101 1:07:00

11 weeks 전1:07:00

나중에 재생

나중에 재생

1:07:00

We're joined by Michigan law professor Richard Primus to talk about his new book, "The Oldest Constitutional Question: Enumerated and Federal Power." Richard describes one of the the most widespread beliefs about constitutional law -- that the federal government is one of limited, enumerated powers -- and why he thinks it is actually wrong. Along the way, we discuss methods of constitutional interpretation, the relationship between the official story of the law and legal practice, and wrestle with the surprisingly hard question of how many congressional powers are listed in the Constitution.…

1
Originalism Hulk 1:26:44

14 weeks 전1:26:44

나중에 재생

나중에 재생

1:26:44

Continuing our long slog through the end-of-Term opinion dump, it's fraud day! We dig into Kousisis v. United States and Thompson v. United States , two interesting federal criminal law puzzles.

1
The Country of the Future 1:30:32

16 weeks 전1:30:32

나중에 재생

나중에 재생

1:30:32

We finally circle back to the two big structural constitutional law cases from the last day of the term. First is Kennedy v. Braidwood Management, which upheld the appointment structure of the U.S. Preventative Services Task Force under the Affordable Care Act. Then is FCC v. Consumers' Research , which upheld the universal-service contribution scheme against a pair of non-delegation challenges. Our second-longest episode of the season.…

1
The Thunder Docket 30:50

16 weeks 전30:50

나중에 재생

나중에 재생

30:50

Acting with unpredictable alacrity and unpredictable brevity, we break down the Supreme Court's recent interim order in Trump v. Boyle , and discuss what it means for the unitary executive, and for the shadow docket. We also debate the best name for the Court's emergency/interim orders docket.

1
Snake-Charmer-Specific 1:03:55

17 weeks 전1:03:55

나중에 재생

나중에 재생

1:03:55

Moving with shockingly unpredictable efficiency, we respond to feedback, debate which of us is more composting-friendly, catch up on the emergency docket, and chip away at our end-of-Term backlog by digging into Diamond Alternative Energy v. EPA .

1
Didactic and Inculcatory 1:29:16

19 weeks 전1:29:16

나중에 재생

나중에 재생

1:29:16

We look at the final orders list before summer break, and then continue to work through last month's opinions, this time with an extended analysis of two decisions about children and culture wars -- Mahmoud v. Taylor (religious objections to LGBTQ+-inclusive books) and Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton (age verification for accessing online pornography).…

1
Schrödinger's Innocence Right 1:16:41

19 weeks 전1:16:41

나중에 재생

나중에 재생

1:16:41

We talk a bit more about Trump v. CASA, revisit the usage of "general," answer some voicemails, and then turn to Gutierrez v. Saenz , a procedural tangle about whether a death row inmate can sue a state prosecutor over access to DNA testing.

1
Why Are We Here? 1:12:23

20 weeks 전1:12:23

나중에 재생

나중에 재생

1:12:23

We celebrate the 100th episode of the podcast with a special cross-over episode with Sarah Isgur at Advisory Opinions! Sarah, Will, and Dan break down today's blockbuster decision in Trump v. CASA , forbidding universal injunctions (and not saying much about birthright citizenship).

1
Loose Signification 1:02:05

20 weeks 전1:02:05

나중에 재생

나중에 재생

1:02:05

We're joined by a special guest, Harvard Law Professor Stephen Sachs, to talk about Fuld v. Palestine Liberation Organization . Fuld is last week's big personal jurisdiction case, where the Court upheld federal laws extending jurisdiction to the PLO and PA for antiterrorism lawsuits. The author of several important articles on these issues and an amicus brief in Fuld, Steve gives us his take on the relationship between personal jurisdiction, international law and due process, and helps us evaluate the majority opinion and Justice Thomas's concurrence.…

1
Caesar's Face 1:04:02

20 weeks 전1:04:02

나중에 재생

나중에 재생

1:04:02

After some feedback and further thoughts on our Skrmetti episode and a shocking revelation about "LabCorp," we circle back to an earlier June opinion about religious distinctions, Catholic Charities Bureau v. Wisconsin Labor & Industry Review Commission . Dan keeps Will up past his bedtime.

1
Low Horse 1:13:26

21 weeks 전1:13:26

나중에 재생

나중에 재생

1:13:26

Without much introductory ado, we interrupt Will's vacation to give you a thorough breakdown of United States v. Skrmetti , the trans health care case that is one of the most-watched cases of the term.

1
Truth and Reconciliation 57:26

23 weeks 전57:26

나중에 재생

나중에 재생

57:26

We start out by debating who's responsible for Dan's audio snafus last time before digging into a various odds and ends, such as the Chief Justice's toast at the Supreme Court Historical Society dinner and President Trump's renunciation of Leonard Leo and the Federalist Society. We then try to make sense of the DIG in Labcorp v. Davis and see whether our predictions about Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. v. Estados Unidos Mexicanos panned out.…

플레이어 FM에 오신것을 환영합니다!

플레이어 FM은 웹에서 고품질 팟캐스트를 검색하여 지금 바로 즐길 수 있도록 합니다. 최고의 팟캐스트 앱이며 Android, iPhone 및 웹에서도 작동합니다. 장치 간 구독 동기화를 위해 가입하세요.

500개 이상의 주제를 청취

탐색하는 동안 이 프로그램을 들어보세요.