))
Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
The latest news and analysis about key cases and critical arguments before the Supreme Court. (Updated periodically) PBS NewsHour is supported by - https://www.pbs.org/newshour/about/funders
Unedited English audio of oral arguments at the Supreme Court of Canada. Created as a public service to promote public access and awareness of the workings of Canada's highest court. Not affiliated with or endorsed by the Court. Original archived webcasts can be found on the Court's website at scc-csc.ca. Feedback welcome: podcast at scchearings dot ca.
L
Law360's The Term - News & Analysis on the Supreme Court
1
Law360's The Term - News & Analysis on the Supreme Court
Law360 - Legal News & Analysis
The Term is a podcast from Law360 for the busy U.S. Supreme Court watcher. Give us about 15 minutes each week and we'll catch you up on all the big action at the nation's highest court, along with a list of what to watch in the coming sessions. Hosts senior Supreme Court reporter Jimmy Hoover in Washington, D.C. and editor-at-large Natalie Rodriguez in New York City cut through a busy docket to focus on the key cases and developments everyone will be talking about.
O
Oral Arguments for the Supreme Court of the United States
1
Oral Arguments for the Supreme Court of the United States
Free Law Project
A chronological podcast of oral arguments with improved files and meta data. Hosted by Free Law Project through the CourtListener.com initiative. Not an official podcast.
Government court cases
Supreme Court Season episodes will include all arguments that occur from October 01st to June/July. SIDEBAR Episodes will take place between the end of the current term and the start of the next term. (July - October)
T
The Citizen's Guide to the Supreme Court
1
The Citizen's Guide to the Supreme Court
The Citizens Guide to the Supreme Court
Brett and Nazim are two attorneys who hate being attorneys. Each week, they discuss current Supreme Court cases with the intent to make the law more accessible to the average person, while ruminating on what makes the law both frustrating and interesting. This podcast is not legal advice and is for entertainment purposes only. If anything you hear leads you to believe you need legal advice, please contact an attorney immediately
Audio from oral arguments in the Supreme Court of the United States (beg. Oct. 2010)
In depth explanations of Supreme Court Cases New Jersey v T.L.O, Mapp v Ohio, and Miranda v Arizona.
Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
A podcast feed for the audio of Supreme Court oral arguments and decision announcements. Short case descriptions are reproduced from Oyez.org under a CC BY-NC 4.0 license. This feed is not approved, managed, or affiliated with Oyez.org. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
We will dive into the astounding stories of the Supreme Court.
Opinion announcements from the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
The Queens Supreme Court podcast is the hilarious spinoff of the hit online series “The Queens Supreme Court” with Ts Madison. The premise of the weekly satirical show is to discuss pop culture and all the hot social media trends, topics and gossip THEN try them as cases, render judgements and sentence the crimes accordingly to determine the ultimate fate of each celebrity!
T
The Supreme Court vs. Church/State Separation
1
The Supreme Court vs. Church/State Separation
Hemant Mehta
Podcast by Hemant Mehta
Decisions of the Supreme Court, summarized by the court itself.Readings of the Supreme Court slip opinion syllabi, With no personal commentary, you can make up your own mind about the decisions. See: Wheaton and Donaldson v. Peters and Grigg, 33 U.S. 591 (1834) and United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co., 200 U.S. 321, 337. Photo by: Davi Kelly---Paypal:https://paypal.me/SCOTUSsyllabus---Cash App: $RJDieken---Venmo: RJ-Dieken
T
The Supreme Court: A Basketball Podcast
1
The Supreme Court: A Basketball Podcast
Robaire Taylor, Chris Young, Henri Taylor
Any listeners out there...really want entertaining basketball content? Don't want to worry about the hosts - all on the show trying to force "controversial" hot takes, all in your earbuds, yelling back and forth to win an argument? Come to The Supreme Court: A Basketball Podcast! Check back with the SC trio; Robaire, Chris, and Henri, Wednesdays as we discuss the latest NBA headlines, news, and transactions.
L
Landmark Decisions in the United States Supreme Court
1
Landmark Decisions in the United States Supreme Court
Aaron Larson
Throughout the years the Supreme Court has evolved much like the rest of the federal government. This would not be without landmark rulings, which will be the main focus of this podcast. Landmark rulings lay the groundwork for laws to be overturned or upheld and allow for the United States to work toward major goals. Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/aaron-larson2/support
A
A Christian Response to the Supreme Court Decision
1
A Christian Response to the Supreme Court Decision
Get A Life Media, Billy Crone
This study, A Christian Response to the Supreme Court Decision, exposes the foreboding Danger that this ruling will bring upon our nation if things don’t turn around very quickly. You will also be thoroughly equipped to give a loving Biblical apologetic response to 15 different accusations made against Christians regarding this issue.
A whistleblower has come forward with new details about the lucrative recruitment work that the wife of Chief Justice John Roberts does for large law firms, including some with prolific Supreme Court practices. On this week's episode of The Term we discuss the story with help and insight from special guest Karen Vladeck, an expert in the world of l…
(PUBLICATION BAN) At trial, the appellant was acquitted of sexual interference, invitation to sexual touching and sexual assault respecting the complainant, a person under the age of 16 years. A majority of the Court of Appeal of Newfoundland and Labrador allowed the Crown’s appeal and ordered a new trial. It held that the trial judge engaged in im…
P
PBS NewsHour - Supreme Court
1
Supreme Court says it hasn't identified Roe v. Wade draft opinion leaker
5:50
5:50
나중에 재생
나중에 재생
리스트
좋아요
좋아요
5:50
It was a political earthquake last May when the draft Supreme Court opinion overturning Roe v. Wade was leaked almost two months before the ruling was handed down. Chief Justice John Roberts launched an investigation but said the court has not been able to identify the leaker. Supreme Court analyst Marcia Coyle joined John Yang to discuss the repor…
A case in which the Court will decide whether and when the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) and the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) require a student to exhaust his administrative proceedings against the school district when such proceedings would be futile.
Perez v. Sturgis Public Schools저자 Supreme Court of the United States
L
Law360's The Term - News & Analysis on the Supreme Court
1
S4, E15: Why Did Justices Duck Attorney-Client Privilege?
24:35
24:35
나중에 재생
나중에 재생
리스트
좋아요
좋아요
24:35
At long last, the U.S. Supreme Court handed down its first two decisions of the Supreme Court this week, but one of them was a curious one-line dismissal of a case argued just weeks ago. Law360's The Term examines the possible reasons the justices decide to punt in a closely-watched case about the scope of attorney-client privilege.…
L
Law360's The Term - News & Analysis on the Supreme Court
1
S4, E14: Leaker Unknown After 8 Months, 126 Interviews
35:35
35:35
나중에 재생
나중에 재생
리스트
좋아요
좋아요
35:35
Law360's The Term podcast reacts to the news that U.S. Supreme Court investigators have been unable to unmask the identity of the Dobbs leaker after eight months of investigation on this week's episode. Plus, a breakdown of this week's thorny immigration case and a dispute over whether foreign state-owned enterprises can be indicted…
S
Supreme Court of Canada Hearings
1
Frederick Langford Sharp, et al. v. Autorité des marchés financiers, et al. (39920)
2:17:58
2:17:58
나중에 재생
나중에 재생
리스트
좋아요
좋아요
2:17:58
In 2017, the AMF brought an action before the FMAT alleging that the appellants participated in a transnational pump and dump scheme by improperly influencing or manipulating the price of a stock in contravention of the Quebec Securities Act, CQLR, c. V-1.1. According to the AMF, the appellants, who are residents of B.C., made financial transaction…
In September 2017, the police commenced an investigation related to the purchase of virtual gift cards with fraudulent credit card information. The police was told that the fraudulent online transactions used two IP addresses. The police obtained warrants to search the two residences associated with the IP addresses. The appellant was arrested and …
A case in which the Court will decide whether U.S. district courts may exercise subject-matter jurisdiction over criminal prosecutions against foreign sovereigns and their instrumentalities under 18 U.S.C. § 3231 and in light of the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act.
A case in which the Court will decide whether federal immigration law bars a federal court of appeals from reviewing an immigrant’s claim that the Board of Immigration Appeals had engaged in impermissible factfinding because the immigrant had not exhausted that claim through a motion to reconsider.
Santos-Zacaria v. Garland, Att'y Gen.저자 Supreme Court of the United States
Turkiye Halk Bankasi A.S. v. United States저자 Supreme Court of the United States
The U.S. Supreme Court has heard just over 30 cases in the first three months of the term, but has yet to decide a single one. Law360's The Term podcast discusses the historically slow start to the term, as well as two cases of particular interest to the legal and labor worlds.저자 Law360 - Legal News & Analysis
S
Supreme Court of Canada Hearings
1
Antoine Ponce, et al. v. Société d’investissements Rhéaume ltée, et al. (39931)
2:02:15
2:02:15
나중에 재생
나중에 재생
리스트
좋아요
좋아요
2:02:15
The appellants, Mr. Ponce and Mr. Riopel, served as presidents of three companies grouped together under the name “Le Groupe Excellence” controlled by the respondent shareholders, Mr. Rhéaume and Mr. Beaulne. Rhéaume and Beaulne founded Excellence in the late 1970’s, but their working relationship ultimately broke down due to a revenue share disput…
At trial before judge and jury, the appellant, Ahmed Abdullahi was convicted of various gun-related offences including one count of participation in the activities of a criminal organization for the purpose of trafficking weapons, contrary to s. 467.11 of the Criminal Code. The charges resulted from a police investigation dubbed “Project Traveller”…
U
U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments
1
Financial Oversight and Management Board for Puerto Rico v. Centro de Periodismo Investigativo, Inc.
56:27
56:27
나중에 재생
나중에 재생
리스트
좋아요
좋아요
56:27
A case in which the Court will decide whether the Puerto Rico Oversight, Management, and Economic Stability Act (PROMESA)’s general grant of jurisdiction to the federal courts over claims against the Financial Oversight and Management Board for Puerto Rico and claims otherwise arising under PROMESA abrogate the Board’s sovereign immunity with respe…
Financial Oversight Board v. CPI저자 Supreme Court of the United States
U
U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments
1
Glacier Northwest, Inc. v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters
1:26:00
1:26:00
나중에 재생
나중에 재생
리스트
좋아요
좋아요
1:26:00
A case in which the Court will decide whether the National Labor Relations Act preempts a state-court lawsuit against a union for intentionally destroying an employer’s property during a labor dispute.
O
Oral Arguments for the Supreme Court of the United States
1
Glacier Northwest, Inc. v. Int'l Brotherhood of Teamsters
1:13:51
1:13:51
나중에 재생
나중에 재생
리스트
좋아요
좋아요
1:13:51
Glacier Northwest, Inc. v. Int'l Brotherhood of Teamsters저자 Supreme Court of the United States
A case in which the Court was asked to decide whether a communication involving both legal and non-legal advice is protected by attorney-client privilege when obtaining or providing legal advice was one of the significant purposes behind the communication.
U
U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments
1
The Ohio Adjutant General’s Department v. Federal Labor Relations Authority
1:29:32
1:29:32
나중에 재생
나중에 재생
리스트
좋아요
좋아요
1:29:32
A case in which the Court will decide whether the Civil Service Reform Act of 1978, which empowers the Federal Labor Relations Authority to regulate the labor practices of federal agencies, also empowers it to regulate the labor practices of state militias.
In Re Grand Jury저자 Supreme Court of the United States
P
PBS NewsHour - Supreme Court
1
A look at the big issues that inspired new state laws taking effect in 2023
6:44
6:44
나중에 재생
나중에 재생
리스트
좋아요
좋아요
6:44
The start of this new year is bringing with it some new state laws. Thousands of bills were passed in state legislatures in 2022, but there are a few issues that stand out for which many states have decided to take action. Stephanie Sy has a look at some of the changes on the way. PBS NewsHour is supported by - https://www.pbs.org/newshour/about/fu…
There are no Christmas themed cases this year, so Brett and Nazim usher in our holiday break by covering In re Grand Jury, a case with anonymous parties, no facts, and the Supreme Court seemingly poised to overturn a generally reasonable 9th Circuit Decision. Let the good times roll. The law starts at (9:23), some scheduling announcements start at …
L
Law360's The Term - News & Analysis on the Supreme Court
1
S4, E12: Do The Justices Need Time Management Training?
48:00
48:00
나중에 재생
나중에 재생
리스트
좋아요
좋아요
48:00
The U.S. Supreme Court has recessed for winter break without issuing a single merits opinion in the slowest beginning of a term in years. Meanwhile, arguments are longer than they've been in decades. In its year-end episode, Law360's The Term asks: Do the justices need better time management skills?저자 Law360 - Legal News & Analysis
Ho ho ho! Just in time for the holidays, the podcast covers the most direct example of the Supreme Court possibly taking $20,000.00 out of your pocket. This week, Brett and Nazim discuss Biden v. Nebraska, which covers whether the Supreme Court will vacate a stay on President Biden's student loan forgiveness plan by playing all the President's admi…
If Republican lawmakers thought the conservative justices would fully embrace a novel theory stripping state courts of power to review federal election rules, Wednesday's oral arguments at the Supreme Court was a tough wake-up call. Law360's The Term breaks down Moore v. Harper on this week's episode.…
P
PBS NewsHour - Supreme Court
1
Lawmakers pass landmark legislation aimed at protecting same-sex marriages
5:22
5:22
나중에 재생
나중에 재생
리스트
좋아요
좋아요
5:22
Congress gave final approval to a bill requiring all states to recognize same-sex and interracial marriages. It passed the House with nearly 40 Republicans joining Democrats in support. On the floor, arguments focused on protecting marriage rights against a conservative Supreme Court versus protecting religious freedoms. Kate Sosin, a reporter for …
S
Supreme Court of Canada Hearings
1
Attorney General of Québec, et al. v. Attorney General of Canada, et al. (40061)
4:30:01
4:30:01
나중에 재생
나중에 재생
리스트
좋아요
좋아요
4:30:01
By Order in Council 1288 2019 of December 18, 2019, the Quebec government submitted the following question to the Quebec Court of Appeal: Is An Act respecting First Nations, Inuit and Métis children, youth and families, S.C. 2019, c. 24, ultra vires the Parliament of Canada under the Constitution of Canada? The Court of Appeal answered that the Act…
A case in which the Court will resolve the dispute over the “Independent State Legislature” (ISL) theory—that only a state legislature has the power to regulate federal elections, notwithstanding state courts or constitutional constraints.
After a trial in the Court of Québec, the appellant, Mikerlson Vernelus, was convicted of possession of a firearm and breach of a recognizance. A vehicle with the appellant and two other individuals in it had been stopped by the police and the appellant had been arrested for possession of cannabis. During the search incident to the arrest, the poli…
A case in which the Court will decide whether a bankruptcy debtor can be held liable for another person’s fraud, even when they were not aware of the fraud.
U
U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments
1
U.S., ex rel. Polansky v. Executive Health Resources
1:21:23
1:21:23
나중에 재생
나중에 재생
리스트
좋아요
좋아요
1:21:23
A case in which the Court will decide whether, when an individual brings a lawsuit on behalf of the government alleging fraud on the United States, the government has the power to dismiss the lawsuit after initially declining to take over the case, and what standard applies if the government has that power.…
S
Supreme Court of the United States
1
303 Creative LLC v. Elenis, No. 21-476 [Arg: 12.5.2022]
2:21:58
2:21:58
나중에 재생
나중에 재생
리스트
좋아요
좋아요
2:21:58
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether applying a public-accommodation law to compel an artist to speak or stay silent violates the free speech clause of the First Amendment.저자 Austin Songer
S
Supreme Court of the United States
1
MOAC Mall Holdings LLC v. Transform Holdco LLC, No. 21-1270 [Arg: 12.5.2022]
1:09:52
1:09:52
나중에 재생
나중에 재생
리스트
좋아요
좋아요
1:09:52
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether Bankruptcy Code Section 363(m) limits the appellate courts’ jurisdiction over any sale order or order deemed “integral” to a sale order, such that it is not subject to waiver, and even when a remedy could be fashioned that does not affect the validity of the sale.저자 Austin Songer
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether the Quiet Title Act’s statute of limitations is a jurisdictional requirement or a claim-processing rule.저자 Austin Songer
QUESTION PRESENTED: (1) Whether state plaintiffs have Article III standing to challenge the Department of Homeland Security’s Guidelines for the Enforcement of Civil Immigration Law; (2) whether the Guidelines are contrary to 8 U.S.C. § 1226(c) or 8 U.S.C. § 1231(a), or otherwise violate the Administrative Procedure Act; and (3) whether 8 U.S.C. § …
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether a private citizen who holds no elected office or government employment, but has informal political or other influence over governmental decisionmaking, owes a fiduciary duty to the general public such that he can be convicted of honest-services fraud.저자 Austin Songer
S
Supreme Court of the United States
1
Ciminelli v. U.S., No. 21-1170 [Arg: 11.28.2022]
1:17:46
1:17:46
나중에 재생
나중에 재생
리스트
좋아요
좋아요
1:17:46
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit’s “right to control” theory of fraud — which treats the deprivation of complete and accurate information bearing on a person’s economic decision as a species of property fraud — states a valid basis for liability under the federal wire fraud statute.…
U.S., ex rel. Polansky v. Executive Health저자 Supreme Court of the United States
Bartenwerfer v. Buckley저자 Supreme Court of the United States
The Supreme Court heard more than two hours of arguments Monday in this term's clash between LGBTQ rights and religious business owners, with the justices struggling to draw lines between free speech and discrimination. Law360's The Term recaps the hearing in a special recap episode.저자 Law360 - Legal News & Analysis
P
PBS NewsHour - Supreme Court
1
Supreme Court hears case pitting gay rights against religious freedom
7:33
7:33
나중에 재생
나중에 재생
리스트
좋아요
좋아요
7:33
The rights of same-sex couples are once again before the U.S. Supreme Court. Justices on Monday heard arguments in a case that wrestles with the blurred lines separating free speech, religious beliefs and discrimination. John Yang looks at the history of the case and speaks with Marcia Coyle of the National Law Journal to discuss the legal argument…
The parties were married for three years. Both parties came into the marriage with considerable assets, including houses, vehicles, items of personal property, RRSPs, savings and pensions. Shortly after the parties separated, the respondent invited the applicant to a reconciliation meeting with mutual friends. At the end of the meeting, the respond…
A case in which the Court will decide whether applying a public-accommodation law to compel an artist to speak or stay silent violates the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment.
