))
Is Mark 16:9–20 Original? | Part Two: The Evidence (with James Snapp Jr.)
Manage episode 488595302 series 3609350
Michael Young에서 제공하는 콘텐츠입니다. 에피소드, 그래픽, 팟캐스트 설명을 포함한 모든 팟캐스트 콘텐츠는 Michael Young 또는 해당 팟캐스트 플랫폼 파트너가 직접 업로드하고 제공합니다. 누군가가 귀하의 허락 없이 귀하의 저작물을 사용하고 있다고 생각되는 경우 여기에 설명된 절차를 따르실 수 있습니다 https://ko.player.fm/legal.
In this follow-up episode, I’m joined again by New Testament scholar James Snapp Jr.—and this time, we go deep. If Part One was focused on responding to Wes Huff’s video arguing against the long ending of Mark, Part Two is all about the positive case.
Snapp walks us through a wide range of evidence supporting the authenticity of Mark 16:9–20, including:
Greek manuscript data
Patristic citations
Internal consistency with Mark’s style
And why it absolutely deserves to be in your Bible
This episode includes detailed analysis, historical context, and even references to the slides presented in the YouTube version.
👉 Haven’t heard Part One yet? Start here: https://youtu.be/vcrUof_liVg
Explore more from James Snapp Jr.:
• Main site: https://jamessnappjr.com/
• Textual criticism blog: https://www.thetextofthegospels.com/
Support the podcast + grab the new Michael Heiser tribute shirt:
https://charismatic-cheetah.printify.me/
Be sure to follow, share, and leave a review if this episode helped you see the long ending of Mark in a new light!
#Mark16 #TextualCriticism #JamesSnapp #BiblePodcast #LongEndingOfMark #BiblicalManuscripts #NewTestament #WesHuff #CharismaticCheetah #MichaelHeiser
44 에피소드
공유
