Artwork

John Danaher에서 제공하는 콘텐츠입니다. 에피소드, 그래픽, 팟캐스트 설명을 포함한 모든 팟캐스트 콘텐츠는 John Danaher 또는 해당 팟캐스트 플랫폼 파트너가 직접 업로드하고 제공합니다. 누군가가 귀하의 허락 없이 귀하의 저작물을 사용하고 있다고 생각되는 경우 여기에 설명된 절차를 따르실 수 있습니다 https://ko.player.fm/legal.
Player FM -팟 캐스트 앱
Player FM 앱으로 오프라인으로 전환하세요!

Episode #50 – Loi on Facebook, Justice and Data as the New Oil

 
공유
 

Manage episode 223804054 series 1328245
John Danaher에서 제공하는 콘텐츠입니다. 에피소드, 그래픽, 팟캐스트 설명을 포함한 모든 팟캐스트 콘텐츠는 John Danaher 또는 해당 팟캐스트 플랫폼 파트너가 직접 업로드하고 제공합니다. 누군가가 귀하의 허락 없이 귀하의 저작물을 사용하고 있다고 생각되는 경우 여기에 설명된 절차를 따르실 수 있습니다 https://ko.player.fm/legal.

Michele_Loi.jpg

In this episode I talk to Michele Loi. Michele is a political philosopher turned bioethicist turned digital ethicist. He is currently (2017-2020) working on two interdisciplinary projects, one of which is about the ethical implications of big data at the University of Zurich. In the past, he developed an ethical framework of governance for the Swiss MIDATA cooperative (2016). He is interested in bringing insights from ethics and political philosophy to bear on big data, proposing more ethical forms of institutional organization, firm behavior, and legal-political arrangements concerning data. We talk about how you can use Rawls’s theory of justice to evaluate the role of dominant tech platforms (particularly Facebook) in modern life.

You download the show here or listen below. You can also subscribe on iTunes or Stitcher (the RSS feed is here).

Show Notes

  • 0:00 – Introduction
  • 1:29 – Why use Rawls to assess data platforms?
  • 2:58 – Does the analogy between data and oil hold up to scrutiny?
  • 7:04 – The First Key Idea: Rawls’s Basic Social Structures
  • 11:20 – The Second Key Idea: Dominant Tech Platforms as Basic Social Structures
  • 15:02 – Is Facebook a Dominant Tech Platform?
  • 19:58 – How Zuckerberg’s recent memo highlights Facebook’s status as a basic social structure
  • 23:10 – A brief primer on Rawls’s two principles of justice
  • 29:18 – Dominant tech platforms and respect for the basic liberties (particularly free speech)
  • 36:48 – Facebook: Media Company or Nudging Platform? Does it matter from the perspective of justice?
  • 41:43 – Why Facebook might have a duty to ensure that we don’t get trapped in a filter bubble
  • 44:32 – Is it fair to impose such a duty on Facebook as a private enterprise?
  • 51:18 – Would it be practically difficult for Facebook to fulfil this duty?
  • 53:02 – Is data-mining and monetisation exploitative?
  • 56:14 – Is it possible to explore other economic models for the data economy?
  • 59:44 – Can regulatory frameworks (e.g. the GDPR) incentivise alternative business models?
  • 1:01:50 – Is there hope for the future?

Relevant Links

  continue reading

64 에피소드

Artwork
icon공유
 
Manage episode 223804054 series 1328245
John Danaher에서 제공하는 콘텐츠입니다. 에피소드, 그래픽, 팟캐스트 설명을 포함한 모든 팟캐스트 콘텐츠는 John Danaher 또는 해당 팟캐스트 플랫폼 파트너가 직접 업로드하고 제공합니다. 누군가가 귀하의 허락 없이 귀하의 저작물을 사용하고 있다고 생각되는 경우 여기에 설명된 절차를 따르실 수 있습니다 https://ko.player.fm/legal.

Michele_Loi.jpg

In this episode I talk to Michele Loi. Michele is a political philosopher turned bioethicist turned digital ethicist. He is currently (2017-2020) working on two interdisciplinary projects, one of which is about the ethical implications of big data at the University of Zurich. In the past, he developed an ethical framework of governance for the Swiss MIDATA cooperative (2016). He is interested in bringing insights from ethics and political philosophy to bear on big data, proposing more ethical forms of institutional organization, firm behavior, and legal-political arrangements concerning data. We talk about how you can use Rawls’s theory of justice to evaluate the role of dominant tech platforms (particularly Facebook) in modern life.

You download the show here or listen below. You can also subscribe on iTunes or Stitcher (the RSS feed is here).

Show Notes

  • 0:00 – Introduction
  • 1:29 – Why use Rawls to assess data platforms?
  • 2:58 – Does the analogy between data and oil hold up to scrutiny?
  • 7:04 – The First Key Idea: Rawls’s Basic Social Structures
  • 11:20 – The Second Key Idea: Dominant Tech Platforms as Basic Social Structures
  • 15:02 – Is Facebook a Dominant Tech Platform?
  • 19:58 – How Zuckerberg’s recent memo highlights Facebook’s status as a basic social structure
  • 23:10 – A brief primer on Rawls’s two principles of justice
  • 29:18 – Dominant tech platforms and respect for the basic liberties (particularly free speech)
  • 36:48 – Facebook: Media Company or Nudging Platform? Does it matter from the perspective of justice?
  • 41:43 – Why Facebook might have a duty to ensure that we don’t get trapped in a filter bubble
  • 44:32 – Is it fair to impose such a duty on Facebook as a private enterprise?
  • 51:18 – Would it be practically difficult for Facebook to fulfil this duty?
  • 53:02 – Is data-mining and monetisation exploitative?
  • 56:14 – Is it possible to explore other economic models for the data economy?
  • 59:44 – Can regulatory frameworks (e.g. the GDPR) incentivise alternative business models?
  • 1:01:50 – Is there hope for the future?

Relevant Links

  continue reading

64 에피소드

Усі епізоди

×
 
Loading …

플레이어 FM에 오신것을 환영합니다!

플레이어 FM은 웹에서 고품질 팟캐스트를 검색하여 지금 바로 즐길 수 있도록 합니다. 최고의 팟캐스트 앱이며 Android, iPhone 및 웹에서도 작동합니다. 장치 간 구독 동기화를 위해 가입하세요.

 

빠른 참조 가이드