Highlights: #204 – Nate Silver on making sense of SBF, and his biggest critiques of effective altruism

80k After Hours

Rob Wiblin and Keiran Harris and The 80000 Hours team에서 제공하는 콘텐츠입니다. 에피소드, 그래픽, 팟캐스트 설명을 포함한 모든 팟캐스트 콘텐츠는 Rob Wiblin and Keiran Harris and The 80000 Hours team 또는 해당 팟캐스트 플랫폼 파트너가 직접 업로드하고 제공합니다. 누군가가 귀하의 허락 없이 귀하의 저작물을 사용하고 있다고 생각되는 경우 여기에 설명된 절차를 따르실 수 있습니다 https://ko.player.fm/legal.

2M ago 19:20

MP3•에피소드 홈

Election forecaster Nate Silver gives his takes on: how effective altruism could be better, the stark tradeoffs we faced with COVID, whether the 13 Keys to the White House is "junk science," how to tell whose election predictions are better, and if venture capitalists really take risks.

This is a selection of highlights from episode #204 of The 80,000 Hours Podcast: Nate Silver on making sense of SBF, and his biggest critiques of effective altruism. These aren't necessarily the most important, or even most entertaining parts of the interview — so if you enjoy this, we strongly recommend checking out the full episode.

And if you're finding these highlights episodes valuable, please let us know by emailing podcast@80000hours.org.

Highlights:

Rob’s intro (00:00:00)
Is anyone doing better at "doing good better"? (00:00:29)
Is effective altruism too big to succeed? (00:02:19)
The stark tradeoffs we faced with COVID (00:06:02)
The 13 Keys to the White House (00:07:53)
Can we tell whose election predictions are better? (00:11:40)
Do venture capitalists really take risks? (00:16:29)

Highlights put together by Simon Monsour, Milo McGuire, and Dominic Armstrong

100 에피소드