Artwork

VP Live Talk Radio - Vaping Podcasts에서 제공하는 콘텐츠입니다. 에피소드, 그래픽, 팟캐스트 설명을 포함한 모든 팟캐스트 콘텐츠는 VP Live Talk Radio - Vaping Podcasts 또는 해당 팟캐스트 플랫폼 파트너가 직접 업로드하고 제공합니다. 누군가가 귀하의 허락 없이 귀하의 저작물을 사용하고 있다고 생각되는 경우 여기에 설명된 절차를 따르실 수 있습니다 https://ko.player.fm/legal.
Player FM -팟 캐스트 앱
Player FM 앱으로 오프라인으로 전환하세요!

The Geyser of Outrage

1:12:13
 
공유
 

Manage episode 171055634 series 32862
VP Live Talk Radio - Vaping Podcasts에서 제공하는 콘텐츠입니다. 에피소드, 그래픽, 팟캐스트 설명을 포함한 모든 팟캐스트 콘텐츠는 VP Live Talk Radio - Vaping Podcasts 또는 해당 팟캐스트 플랫폼 파트너가 직접 업로드하고 제공합니다. 누군가가 귀하의 허락 없이 귀하의 저작물을 사용하고 있다고 생각되는 경우 여기에 설명된 절차를 따르실 수 있습니다 https://ko.player.fm/legal.
I'll show you how Trump is using weapons grade persuasion techniques to alter how your memory works. Black Lives Matter resentful of peaceful Women’s March against Trump http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/jan/24/black-lives-matter-resents-peaceful-favorable-wome/ If you're not reading Scott Adams' blog, you're missing out! http://blog.dilbert.com Feel free to use this as you see fit: "visa holders from Iraq, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen will be primarily affected by the new order." My two major criticisms of this are 1) that he didn't he do this on Monday, and 2) that the list of countries has some glaring omissions, most notably Saudi Arabia, Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Nigeria. Immigration is a government program. Government programs exist for the benefit of the citizens of that country, not for the benefit of other countries' citizens. The goal of any government program should be to benefit the citizens of that country. If accepting immigrants from a certain country is working out well, we should do it more. It it isn't, we should do it less or stop. No thinking person believes that the net benefit to American citizens is the same when comparing immigration from different countries. Our soil is not magic. There is a continuum of risk and benefit associated with immigration from different countries. We have data collected over decades that tells us what is safer, and what results in more prosperity for the country - for American citizens. Immigration from some countries has resulted in a boon for the US economy. Immigration from other countries has been a drain on the economy. Nobody disputes this. There are significant differences in results. We get to choose who comes here. We should choose to accept the immigrants who help the citizens of this country the most, and what places US citizens at the least risk. People treat this issue emotionally. There is no need for that. Just do it by the numbers using objective criteria. The question to ask is: has immigration from [insert name of country here] helped or hurt the safety and prosperity of the United States in the long run? Trump's list is too short.
  continue reading

861 에피소드

Artwork
icon공유
 
Manage episode 171055634 series 32862
VP Live Talk Radio - Vaping Podcasts에서 제공하는 콘텐츠입니다. 에피소드, 그래픽, 팟캐스트 설명을 포함한 모든 팟캐스트 콘텐츠는 VP Live Talk Radio - Vaping Podcasts 또는 해당 팟캐스트 플랫폼 파트너가 직접 업로드하고 제공합니다. 누군가가 귀하의 허락 없이 귀하의 저작물을 사용하고 있다고 생각되는 경우 여기에 설명된 절차를 따르실 수 있습니다 https://ko.player.fm/legal.
I'll show you how Trump is using weapons grade persuasion techniques to alter how your memory works. Black Lives Matter resentful of peaceful Women’s March against Trump http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/jan/24/black-lives-matter-resents-peaceful-favorable-wome/ If you're not reading Scott Adams' blog, you're missing out! http://blog.dilbert.com Feel free to use this as you see fit: "visa holders from Iraq, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen will be primarily affected by the new order." My two major criticisms of this are 1) that he didn't he do this on Monday, and 2) that the list of countries has some glaring omissions, most notably Saudi Arabia, Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Nigeria. Immigration is a government program. Government programs exist for the benefit of the citizens of that country, not for the benefit of other countries' citizens. The goal of any government program should be to benefit the citizens of that country. If accepting immigrants from a certain country is working out well, we should do it more. It it isn't, we should do it less or stop. No thinking person believes that the net benefit to American citizens is the same when comparing immigration from different countries. Our soil is not magic. There is a continuum of risk and benefit associated with immigration from different countries. We have data collected over decades that tells us what is safer, and what results in more prosperity for the country - for American citizens. Immigration from some countries has resulted in a boon for the US economy. Immigration from other countries has been a drain on the economy. Nobody disputes this. There are significant differences in results. We get to choose who comes here. We should choose to accept the immigrants who help the citizens of this country the most, and what places US citizens at the least risk. People treat this issue emotionally. There is no need for that. Just do it by the numbers using objective criteria. The question to ask is: has immigration from [insert name of country here] helped or hurt the safety and prosperity of the United States in the long run? Trump's list is too short.
  continue reading

861 에피소드

كل الحلقات

×
 
Loading …

플레이어 FM에 오신것을 환영합니다!

플레이어 FM은 웹에서 고품질 팟캐스트를 검색하여 지금 바로 즐길 수 있도록 합니다. 최고의 팟캐스트 앱이며 Android, iPhone 및 웹에서도 작동합니다. 장치 간 구독 동기화를 위해 가입하세요.

 

빠른 참조 가이드

탐색하는 동안 이 프로그램을 들어보세요.
재생