Artwork

Valentino Stoll, Joe Leo, Valentino Stoll, and Joe Leo에서 제공하는 콘텐츠입니다. 에피소드, 그래픽, 팟캐스트 설명을 포함한 모든 팟캐스트 콘텐츠는 Valentino Stoll, Joe Leo, Valentino Stoll, and Joe Leo 또는 해당 팟캐스트 플랫폼 파트너가 직접 업로드하고 제공합니다. 누군가가 귀하의 허락 없이 귀하의 저작물을 사용하고 있다고 생각되는 경우 여기에 설명된 절차를 따르실 수 있습니다 https://ko.player.fm/legal.
Player FM -팟 캐스트 앱
Player FM 앱으로 오프라인으로 전환하세요!

Contracts and Code: The Realities of AI Development

47:51
 
공유
 

Manage episode 508029386 series 3642718
Valentino Stoll, Joe Leo, Valentino Stoll, and Joe Leo에서 제공하는 콘텐츠입니다. 에피소드, 그래픽, 팟캐스트 설명을 포함한 모든 팟캐스트 콘텐츠는 Valentino Stoll, Joe Leo, Valentino Stoll, and Joe Leo 또는 해당 팟캐스트 플랫폼 파트너가 직접 업로드하고 제공합니다. 누군가가 귀하의 허락 없이 귀하의 저작물을 사용하고 있다고 생각되는 경우 여기에 설명된 절차를 따르실 수 있습니다 https://ko.player.fm/legal.

In this episode, Valentino Stoll and Joe Leo unpack the widening gap between headline-grabbing AI salaries and the day-to-day realities of building sustainable AI products. From sports-style contracts stuffed with equity to the true cost of running large models, they explore why incremental gains often matter more than hype. The conversation dives into the messy art of benchmarking LLMs, the fresh evaluation tools emerging in the Ruby ecosystem, and new OpenAI features that change how prompts, tools, and reasoning tokens are handled. Along the way, they weigh the business math of switching models, debate standardisation versus playful experimentation in Ruby, and highlight frameworks like RubyLLM, Phoenix, and Leva that are reshaping how developers ship AI features.

Takeaways

  • The importance of marketing oneself in the tech industry.
  • Disparity in AI salaries reflects market demand and hype.
  • AI contracts often include equity, complicating true value assessment.
  • The AI race lacks clear winners, with incremental improvements across models.
  • User experience often outweighs model efficacy in AI products.
  • Prompt engineering is crucial for optimizing model performance.
  • Benchmarking AI models is complex and requires tailored evaluation sets.
  • Existing tools for AI evaluation are often insufficient for specific needs.
  • Cost analysis is critical when choosing AI models for business.
  • Incremental improvements in AI models may not meet user expectations. You can constrain tool outputs to specific grammars for flexibility.
  • Asking models to think out loud can enhance tool calls.
  • Reasoning tokens can be reused in subsequent AI calls.
  • Evaluating AI frameworks is crucial for business decisions.
  • Ruby's integration in AI is becoming more prominent.
  • The AI landscape is rapidly evolving, requiring adaptability.
  • Hype cycles can mislead developers about tool longevity.
  • Ruby offers a unique user experience for developers.
  • Tinkering with code fosters creativity and innovation.
  • The playful nature of Ruby can lead to unexpected insights.

  continue reading

12 에피소드

Artwork
icon공유
 
Manage episode 508029386 series 3642718
Valentino Stoll, Joe Leo, Valentino Stoll, and Joe Leo에서 제공하는 콘텐츠입니다. 에피소드, 그래픽, 팟캐스트 설명을 포함한 모든 팟캐스트 콘텐츠는 Valentino Stoll, Joe Leo, Valentino Stoll, and Joe Leo 또는 해당 팟캐스트 플랫폼 파트너가 직접 업로드하고 제공합니다. 누군가가 귀하의 허락 없이 귀하의 저작물을 사용하고 있다고 생각되는 경우 여기에 설명된 절차를 따르실 수 있습니다 https://ko.player.fm/legal.

In this episode, Valentino Stoll and Joe Leo unpack the widening gap between headline-grabbing AI salaries and the day-to-day realities of building sustainable AI products. From sports-style contracts stuffed with equity to the true cost of running large models, they explore why incremental gains often matter more than hype. The conversation dives into the messy art of benchmarking LLMs, the fresh evaluation tools emerging in the Ruby ecosystem, and new OpenAI features that change how prompts, tools, and reasoning tokens are handled. Along the way, they weigh the business math of switching models, debate standardisation versus playful experimentation in Ruby, and highlight frameworks like RubyLLM, Phoenix, and Leva that are reshaping how developers ship AI features.

Takeaways

  • The importance of marketing oneself in the tech industry.
  • Disparity in AI salaries reflects market demand and hype.
  • AI contracts often include equity, complicating true value assessment.
  • The AI race lacks clear winners, with incremental improvements across models.
  • User experience often outweighs model efficacy in AI products.
  • Prompt engineering is crucial for optimizing model performance.
  • Benchmarking AI models is complex and requires tailored evaluation sets.
  • Existing tools for AI evaluation are often insufficient for specific needs.
  • Cost analysis is critical when choosing AI models for business.
  • Incremental improvements in AI models may not meet user expectations. You can constrain tool outputs to specific grammars for flexibility.
  • Asking models to think out loud can enhance tool calls.
  • Reasoning tokens can be reused in subsequent AI calls.
  • Evaluating AI frameworks is crucial for business decisions.
  • Ruby's integration in AI is becoming more prominent.
  • The AI landscape is rapidly evolving, requiring adaptability.
  • Hype cycles can mislead developers about tool longevity.
  • Ruby offers a unique user experience for developers.
  • Tinkering with code fosters creativity and innovation.
  • The playful nature of Ruby can lead to unexpected insights.

  continue reading

12 에피소드

모든 에피소드

×
 
Loading …

플레이어 FM에 오신것을 환영합니다!

플레이어 FM은 웹에서 고품질 팟캐스트를 검색하여 지금 바로 즐길 수 있도록 합니다. 최고의 팟캐스트 앱이며 Android, iPhone 및 웹에서도 작동합니다. 장치 간 구독 동기화를 위해 가입하세요.

 

빠른 참조 가이드

탐색하는 동안 이 프로그램을 들어보세요.
재생