23 subscribers
Player FM 앱으로 오프라인으로 전환하세요!
The deuterium episode controversies
Manage episode 405467345 series 2712975
I recently ran a pair of episodes investigating claims of the health effects of deuterium, a stable heavy isotope of hydrogen. The first interview was with a Naturopath, and the second was with a real medical doctor publishing peer reviewed papers on the topic. And my focus in this effort is on drilling through the BS to get to what the evidence says. This takes sustained skepticism, and it doesn’t always make friends. Many people are turned off by the methods of science. It reminds me of why I never liked the TV series X-files. The scientist was always being appropriately skeptical of phenomena that have, at best, only breathless anecdotal support. But she was constantly being shamed by the male character for not ‘believing’ that the truth is out there. But believing extraordinary claims without sufficient evidence makes you gullible. You have the choice of being a friendly fool in believing that astrology or alternative medicine, homeopathy, or other superstitions should be given equal standing with experimentally tested scientific knowledge.
So in this episode I want to give you some tools to identify bafflegab, gobbledygook, and pseudo-science, while reviewing some of the reactions I received.
Support the podcast at patron.podbean.com/TheRationalView
Give me your feedback on Facebook @TheRationalView
Twittter @AlScottRational
201 에피소드
Manage episode 405467345 series 2712975
I recently ran a pair of episodes investigating claims of the health effects of deuterium, a stable heavy isotope of hydrogen. The first interview was with a Naturopath, and the second was with a real medical doctor publishing peer reviewed papers on the topic. And my focus in this effort is on drilling through the BS to get to what the evidence says. This takes sustained skepticism, and it doesn’t always make friends. Many people are turned off by the methods of science. It reminds me of why I never liked the TV series X-files. The scientist was always being appropriately skeptical of phenomena that have, at best, only breathless anecdotal support. But she was constantly being shamed by the male character for not ‘believing’ that the truth is out there. But believing extraordinary claims without sufficient evidence makes you gullible. You have the choice of being a friendly fool in believing that astrology or alternative medicine, homeopathy, or other superstitions should be given equal standing with experimentally tested scientific knowledge.
So in this episode I want to give you some tools to identify bafflegab, gobbledygook, and pseudo-science, while reviewing some of the reactions I received.
Support the podcast at patron.podbean.com/TheRationalView
Give me your feedback on Facebook @TheRationalView
Twittter @AlScottRational
201 에피소드
모든 에피소드
×1 Planetary scientist Dr. John Moores takes readers to the farthest reaches of the solar system 32:31
1 Former Hungarian MP, Dr. Gabor Scheiring compares Trump to authoritarian leader Viktor Orban 48:34
1 Dr. Rob Howarth says natural gas is worse than coal for the environment 33:57
1 Dominic Cardy introduces a new evidence-based Canadian political party 55:13
1 Jamie Merchant introduces Modern Monetary Theory and the failure of capitalism 57:02
1 Neurologist Dr. Richard Cytowic says screens are addictive and bad for your brain 47:57
1 Dr. Michael Weist provides a crucial piece of evidence linking consciousness to quantum states in microtubules 56:37
1 Dr. Lindsey Cormack says ignorance of civics damages democracy 36:27
1 Sharon McMahon says moral narcissism is destroying society 50:33
1 Dr. Michael Levin on cellular consciousness (re-release) 1:11:57
1 Dr. Hector Manrique says a good working memory is uniquely human 52:50
1 Two days is not enough weekend. A Rational rant about inequity. 18:28
플레이어 FM에 오신것을 환영합니다!
플레이어 FM은 웹에서 고품질 팟캐스트를 검색하여 지금 바로 즐길 수 있도록 합니다. 최고의 팟캐스트 앱이며 Android, iPhone 및 웹에서도 작동합니다. 장치 간 구독 동기화를 위해 가입하세요.