The Downfall Of Diddy: Memo In Further Support Of Motion To Dismiss The Amended Complaint (Part 2) (10/20/24)

The Epstein Chronicles

In Jones v. Combs et al. (Civil Action No. 24-cv-01457), defendants Sean Combs, Love Records, and Combs Global Enterprises have filed a Reply Memorandum to support their motion to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint. They argue that the plaintiff, Rodney Jones, fails to provide sufficient evidence to establish plausible claims. The defendants contend that the allegations are speculative, lack necessary detail, and do not meet federal pleading standards. They also argue that some claims are time-barred and that Jones has not shown any fraudulent concealment to toll the statute of limitations.
The defendants further assert that the RICO claims are unfounded, as the complaint lacks evidence of an enterprise or a pattern of racketeering activity—both of which are essential elements for a RICO claim. They maintain that Jones’s allegations are based on broad conclusions rather than concrete facts and lack a clear link to any harm suffered. In conclusion, they request the complete dismissal of the Second Amended Complaint and have asked for oral argument on the motion.
(commercial at 9:41)
to contact me:
[e-mail]
source:
gov.uscourts.nysd.616406.83.0.pdf (courtlistener.com)
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.