Artwork

Bobby Capucci에서 제공하는 콘텐츠입니다. 에피소드, 그래픽, 팟캐스트 설명을 포함한 모든 팟캐스트 콘텐츠는 Bobby Capucci 또는 해당 팟캐스트 플랫폼 파트너가 직접 업로드하고 제공합니다. 누군가가 귀하의 허락 없이 귀하의 저작물을 사용하고 있다고 생각되는 경우 여기에 설명된 절차를 따르실 수 있습니다 https://ko.player.fm/legal.
Player FM -팟 캐스트 앱
Player FM 앱으로 오프라인으로 전환하세요!

Murder In Moscow: Dr. Dahir And The Latest Response To The Prosecutors In Idaho (8/27/24)

22:28
 
공유
 

Manage episode 436504850 series 3380507
Bobby Capucci에서 제공하는 콘텐츠입니다. 에피소드, 그래픽, 팟캐스트 설명을 포함한 모든 팟캐스트 콘텐츠는 Bobby Capucci 또는 해당 팟캐스트 플랫폼 파트너가 직접 업로드하고 제공합니다. 누군가가 귀하의 허락 없이 귀하의 저작물을 사용하고 있다고 생각되는 경우 여기에 설명된 절차를 따르실 수 있습니다 https://ko.player.fm/legal.
To summarize the expert opinion of Dahir in the Reply to State’s Objection to Defendant’s Motion for Change of Venue for Case Number CR29-22-2805, here's a breakdown of the key points presented:
  1. Expert Qualifications: Dahir is presented as an expert with specialized knowledge, likely in fields such as jury psychology, media influence, or public perception, which is relevant to assessing the potential bias in the case's current venue.
  2. Basis for Change of Venue:
    • Media Coverage: Dahir's expert opinion emphasizes that extensive media coverage of the case has potentially biased the local population. This coverage might have shaped public opinion, making it difficult for the defendant to receive a fair and impartial trial.
    • Survey or Study Results: The opinion may include data from surveys or studies conducted to gauge the community’s awareness and opinions about the case. These results might show a significant percentage of the population already forming opinions about the case, thus supporting the argument for a change of venue.
    • Community Sentiment: Dahir likely discusses how the local community’s sentiment toward the case or parties involved has been influenced by factors outside of the courtroom, such as local media narratives or community leaders’ statements.
  3. Legal Standards and Precedents: Dahir might reference legal standards or precedents where similar circumstances (such as high-profile cases with significant media coverage) warranted a change of venue to ensure fairness.
  4. Implications for Fair Trial: The expert opinion argues that without a change of venue, the defendant's right to a fair trial, as guaranteed by the Constitution, would be compromised. Dahir likely concludes that moving the trial to a less influenced or prejudiced location would be in the interest of justice.
  5. Recommendation: Dahir ultimately recommends that the court grant the defendant's motion for a change of venue to avoid the risks of prejudice and ensure the integrity of the judicial process.

(commercial at 13:28)
to contact me:
bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
  continue reading

1035 에피소드

Artwork
icon공유
 
Manage episode 436504850 series 3380507
Bobby Capucci에서 제공하는 콘텐츠입니다. 에피소드, 그래픽, 팟캐스트 설명을 포함한 모든 팟캐스트 콘텐츠는 Bobby Capucci 또는 해당 팟캐스트 플랫폼 파트너가 직접 업로드하고 제공합니다. 누군가가 귀하의 허락 없이 귀하의 저작물을 사용하고 있다고 생각되는 경우 여기에 설명된 절차를 따르실 수 있습니다 https://ko.player.fm/legal.
To summarize the expert opinion of Dahir in the Reply to State’s Objection to Defendant’s Motion for Change of Venue for Case Number CR29-22-2805, here's a breakdown of the key points presented:
  1. Expert Qualifications: Dahir is presented as an expert with specialized knowledge, likely in fields such as jury psychology, media influence, or public perception, which is relevant to assessing the potential bias in the case's current venue.
  2. Basis for Change of Venue:
    • Media Coverage: Dahir's expert opinion emphasizes that extensive media coverage of the case has potentially biased the local population. This coverage might have shaped public opinion, making it difficult for the defendant to receive a fair and impartial trial.
    • Survey or Study Results: The opinion may include data from surveys or studies conducted to gauge the community’s awareness and opinions about the case. These results might show a significant percentage of the population already forming opinions about the case, thus supporting the argument for a change of venue.
    • Community Sentiment: Dahir likely discusses how the local community’s sentiment toward the case or parties involved has been influenced by factors outside of the courtroom, such as local media narratives or community leaders’ statements.
  3. Legal Standards and Precedents: Dahir might reference legal standards or precedents where similar circumstances (such as high-profile cases with significant media coverage) warranted a change of venue to ensure fairness.
  4. Implications for Fair Trial: The expert opinion argues that without a change of venue, the defendant's right to a fair trial, as guaranteed by the Constitution, would be compromised. Dahir likely concludes that moving the trial to a less influenced or prejudiced location would be in the interest of justice.
  5. Recommendation: Dahir ultimately recommends that the court grant the defendant's motion for a change of venue to avoid the risks of prejudice and ensure the integrity of the judicial process.

(commercial at 13:28)
to contact me:
bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
  continue reading

1035 에피소드

Alle episoder

×
 
Loading …

플레이어 FM에 오신것을 환영합니다!

플레이어 FM은 웹에서 고품질 팟캐스트를 검색하여 지금 바로 즐길 수 있도록 합니다. 최고의 팟캐스트 앱이며 Android, iPhone 및 웹에서도 작동합니다. 장치 간 구독 동기화를 위해 가입하세요.

 

빠른 참조 가이드