Artwork

TEK2day에서 제공하는 콘텐츠입니다. 에피소드, 그래픽, 팟캐스트 설명을 포함한 모든 팟캐스트 콘텐츠는 TEK2day 또는 해당 팟캐스트 플랫폼 파트너가 직접 업로드하고 제공합니다. 누군가가 귀하의 허락 없이 귀하의 저작물을 사용하고 있다고 생각되는 경우 여기에 설명된 절차를 따르실 수 있습니다 https://ko.player.fm/legal.
Player FM -팟 캐스트 앱
Player FM 앱으로 오프라인으로 전환하세요!

Ep. 462: New Year's Eve Special

8:37
 
공유
 

Manage episode 392802922 series 1532715
TEK2day에서 제공하는 콘텐츠입니다. 에피소드, 그래픽, 팟캐스트 설명을 포함한 모든 팟캐스트 콘텐츠는 TEK2day 또는 해당 팟캐스트 플랫폼 파트너가 직접 업로드하고 제공합니다. 누군가가 귀하의 허락 없이 귀하의 저작물을 사용하고 있다고 생각되는 경우 여기에 설명된 절차를 따르실 수 있습니다 https://ko.player.fm/legal.
The Fed won’t allow the BTFP to expire on March 11th without first re-inflating the bond market. The banking industry had $684 billion of unrealized losses on the books at the end of Q3. Bank of America alone had $132 billion of unrealized losses on held-to-maturity securities, $107 billion of which were mortgage-backed securities at a yield of 2.12%. At such a low yield, those securities will be underwater unless the Fed Funds rate moves close to the zero bound. Banks typically pull back on credit when a significant amount of unrealized losses are carried on their balance sheets. Banks have not pulled back on credit to the extent they would have if the Fed had not created its Bank Term Funding Program (BTFP) back in March. The BTFP is attractive to qualifying banks as it allows them to borrow while valuing their underwater collateral at par. Further, in recent weeks the BTFP’s borrowing rate has been below Fed Funds (4.83% as of 12/28), which creates a short-term arbitrage opportunity for the banks. Without the BTFP crutch, it is likely that banks would tighten credit. Banks would likely tighten credit in the absence of the BTFP given their concern about the unrealized losses they carry combined with a softening macro economic environment. That is, unless the Fed rapidly reduces interest rates close to the zero bound in order to fully reinflate the bond market. How else will Bank of America and other banks that gorged on debt when the Fed Funds rate was at zero percent ever get their heads above water? I say allow the banks to suffer realized losses, but that is not how the Fed operates. Separate from the Banking unrealized loss issue, the U.S. has the problem of $34 Trillion of Treasury debt, approximately one-third of which is financed short term. Treasury needs to bring the cost of servicing its debt down. Today, the Fed Funds rate is pushing the average cost of servicing the Treasury debt higher. Interest expense will account for approximately 20% of Federal tax receipts in fiscal 2024 - a suffocating amount. Therefore, between Treasury’s debt mountain and the Banking industry’s enormous unrealized loss position, the Fed has sufficient motivation to move interest rates significantly lower in 2024.
  continue reading

520 에피소드

Artwork
icon공유
 
Manage episode 392802922 series 1532715
TEK2day에서 제공하는 콘텐츠입니다. 에피소드, 그래픽, 팟캐스트 설명을 포함한 모든 팟캐스트 콘텐츠는 TEK2day 또는 해당 팟캐스트 플랫폼 파트너가 직접 업로드하고 제공합니다. 누군가가 귀하의 허락 없이 귀하의 저작물을 사용하고 있다고 생각되는 경우 여기에 설명된 절차를 따르실 수 있습니다 https://ko.player.fm/legal.
The Fed won’t allow the BTFP to expire on March 11th without first re-inflating the bond market. The banking industry had $684 billion of unrealized losses on the books at the end of Q3. Bank of America alone had $132 billion of unrealized losses on held-to-maturity securities, $107 billion of which were mortgage-backed securities at a yield of 2.12%. At such a low yield, those securities will be underwater unless the Fed Funds rate moves close to the zero bound. Banks typically pull back on credit when a significant amount of unrealized losses are carried on their balance sheets. Banks have not pulled back on credit to the extent they would have if the Fed had not created its Bank Term Funding Program (BTFP) back in March. The BTFP is attractive to qualifying banks as it allows them to borrow while valuing their underwater collateral at par. Further, in recent weeks the BTFP’s borrowing rate has been below Fed Funds (4.83% as of 12/28), which creates a short-term arbitrage opportunity for the banks. Without the BTFP crutch, it is likely that banks would tighten credit. Banks would likely tighten credit in the absence of the BTFP given their concern about the unrealized losses they carry combined with a softening macro economic environment. That is, unless the Fed rapidly reduces interest rates close to the zero bound in order to fully reinflate the bond market. How else will Bank of America and other banks that gorged on debt when the Fed Funds rate was at zero percent ever get their heads above water? I say allow the banks to suffer realized losses, but that is not how the Fed operates. Separate from the Banking unrealized loss issue, the U.S. has the problem of $34 Trillion of Treasury debt, approximately one-third of which is financed short term. Treasury needs to bring the cost of servicing its debt down. Today, the Fed Funds rate is pushing the average cost of servicing the Treasury debt higher. Interest expense will account for approximately 20% of Federal tax receipts in fiscal 2024 - a suffocating amount. Therefore, between Treasury’s debt mountain and the Banking industry’s enormous unrealized loss position, the Fed has sufficient motivation to move interest rates significantly lower in 2024.
  continue reading

520 에피소드

Tất cả các tập

×
 
Loading …

플레이어 FM에 오신것을 환영합니다!

플레이어 FM은 웹에서 고품질 팟캐스트를 검색하여 지금 바로 즐길 수 있도록 합니다. 최고의 팟캐스트 앱이며 Android, iPhone 및 웹에서도 작동합니다. 장치 간 구독 동기화를 위해 가입하세요.

 

빠른 참조 가이드