Artwork

Technecast에서 제공하는 콘텐츠입니다. 에피소드, 그래픽, 팟캐스트 설명을 포함한 모든 팟캐스트 콘텐츠는 Technecast 또는 해당 팟캐스트 플랫폼 파트너가 직접 업로드하고 제공합니다. 누군가가 귀하의 허락 없이 귀하의 저작물을 사용하고 있다고 생각되는 경우 여기에 설명된 절차를 따르실 수 있습니다 https://ko.player.fm/legal.
Player FM -팟 캐스트 앱
Player FM 앱으로 오프라인으로 전환하세요!

Christina Heflin: The Authenticities of the Ceremonial Hat for Eating Bouillabaisse

44:14
 
공유
 

Manage episode 418712999 series 3574747
Technecast에서 제공하는 콘텐츠입니다. 에피소드, 그래픽, 팟캐스트 설명을 포함한 모든 팟캐스트 콘텐츠는 Technecast 또는 해당 팟캐스트 플랫폼 파트너가 직접 업로드하고 제공합니다. 누군가가 귀하의 허락 없이 귀하의 저작물을 사용하고 있다고 생각되는 경우 여기에 설명된 절차를 따르실 수 있습니다 https://ko.player.fm/legal.
Today we hear from Christina Heflin for the final episode on surrealism.Eileen Agar’s wearable sculpture, The Ceremonial Hat for Eating Bouillabaisse , has a peculiar story that has never been acknowledged by scholars. In each of its images – from either archives, catalogs, publications or film footage – the hat appears to be a different object. Did Agar make an entire series of these hats like the myriad series of objects she created over the years? It would appear so, but since neither the artists nor prior scholarship address this issue, it is hard to determine the truth. This paper aims to establish The Hat ’s narrative and to explain that the hat was a singular, evolving work of art rather than a series. This is not only for the sake of knowing the scope of Agar’s oeuvre , but also to understand the way this important British Surrealist artist worked. The images of The Hat have a range of dates spanning from the late 1930s to 1995, when it arrived in the Victoria and Albert Museum’s permanent collection following Agar’s death. The hat’s life, very much like that of the artist’s, changed and developed over time. I argue that even though this colorful inverted cork basket adorned with both natural and manmade décor features different elements in each photograph, it remains the same work of art. It thereby retains what is essential, what Benjamin calls its aura . Its identity and authority remain indelible despite these changes.Contributor bio:Christina Heflin recently completed her PhD at Royal Holloway University of London where she worked on Surrealism, materialism and marine life. Her thesis is titled Submerged Surrealism: Science in the Service of Subversion . She is currently a lecturer at Parsons Paris and is the author of the book chapter on “Surrealism in England” for the forthcoming Routledge Companion to Surrealism as well as the article “Jean Painlevé’s Surrealism, Marine Life & Non-Ocular Modes of Sensing” for the Cross-Cultural Studies Review (2020) and “Eileen Agar’s Science” for The Modernist Review (2019). You can find her on Twitter - @christy_heflin.Technecast: This episode is presented by Felix Clutson.The Technecast is funded by the Techne AHRC-DTP, and edited by Polly Hember, Julien Clin & Felix Clutson.Contact: technecaster@gmail.com / @technecast / @pollyhember / @ClinJulienRoyalty free music generously shared by Steve Oxen. FesliyanStudios.com
  continue reading

82 에피소드

Artwork
icon공유
 
Manage episode 418712999 series 3574747
Technecast에서 제공하는 콘텐츠입니다. 에피소드, 그래픽, 팟캐스트 설명을 포함한 모든 팟캐스트 콘텐츠는 Technecast 또는 해당 팟캐스트 플랫폼 파트너가 직접 업로드하고 제공합니다. 누군가가 귀하의 허락 없이 귀하의 저작물을 사용하고 있다고 생각되는 경우 여기에 설명된 절차를 따르실 수 있습니다 https://ko.player.fm/legal.
Today we hear from Christina Heflin for the final episode on surrealism.Eileen Agar’s wearable sculpture, The Ceremonial Hat for Eating Bouillabaisse , has a peculiar story that has never been acknowledged by scholars. In each of its images – from either archives, catalogs, publications or film footage – the hat appears to be a different object. Did Agar make an entire series of these hats like the myriad series of objects she created over the years? It would appear so, but since neither the artists nor prior scholarship address this issue, it is hard to determine the truth. This paper aims to establish The Hat ’s narrative and to explain that the hat was a singular, evolving work of art rather than a series. This is not only for the sake of knowing the scope of Agar’s oeuvre , but also to understand the way this important British Surrealist artist worked. The images of The Hat have a range of dates spanning from the late 1930s to 1995, when it arrived in the Victoria and Albert Museum’s permanent collection following Agar’s death. The hat’s life, very much like that of the artist’s, changed and developed over time. I argue that even though this colorful inverted cork basket adorned with both natural and manmade décor features different elements in each photograph, it remains the same work of art. It thereby retains what is essential, what Benjamin calls its aura . Its identity and authority remain indelible despite these changes.Contributor bio:Christina Heflin recently completed her PhD at Royal Holloway University of London where she worked on Surrealism, materialism and marine life. Her thesis is titled Submerged Surrealism: Science in the Service of Subversion . She is currently a lecturer at Parsons Paris and is the author of the book chapter on “Surrealism in England” for the forthcoming Routledge Companion to Surrealism as well as the article “Jean Painlevé’s Surrealism, Marine Life & Non-Ocular Modes of Sensing” for the Cross-Cultural Studies Review (2020) and “Eileen Agar’s Science” for The Modernist Review (2019). You can find her on Twitter - @christy_heflin.Technecast: This episode is presented by Felix Clutson.The Technecast is funded by the Techne AHRC-DTP, and edited by Polly Hember, Julien Clin & Felix Clutson.Contact: technecaster@gmail.com / @technecast / @pollyhember / @ClinJulienRoyalty free music generously shared by Steve Oxen. FesliyanStudios.com
  continue reading

82 에피소드

모든 에피소드

×
 
Loading …

플레이어 FM에 오신것을 환영합니다!

플레이어 FM은 웹에서 고품질 팟캐스트를 검색하여 지금 바로 즐길 수 있도록 합니다. 최고의 팟캐스트 앱이며 Android, iPhone 및 웹에서도 작동합니다. 장치 간 구독 동기화를 위해 가입하세요.

 

빠른 참조 가이드