Player FM 앱으로 오프라인으로 전환하세요!
Paul Alan Levy: Defending Free Speech
Manage episode 517601038 series 2292604
Paul Alan Levy, a public interest attorney at Public Citizen, specializes in defending internet-related free speech cases, particularly those involving individuals targeted by lawsuits for their online expression. While personally committed to protecting all forms of speech, Levy balances this ideal with the progressive values of his organization. He only takes cases when the speech is legally defensible and advancing the case could help set a broader legal precedent. Throughout his career, Levy has developed legal strategies, like the influential Dendrite test, to protect anonymous online speakers from frivolous or strategic lawsuits intended to silence them (SLAPP suits). He warns against threats to online speech, such as efforts to dismantle Section 230 protections, and emphasizes the need for libel insurance for content creators. Despite the growing challenges posed by powerful individuals, corporations, and shifting legal standards, Levy continues to advocate for robust protections of free expression in the digital age.
Paul Alan Levy:
I like the idea of protecting speech of all kinds, even if I potentially disagree with it, although I’m constrained by the fact that I work for Public Citizen, which is a progressive organization which isn’t always happy with my defending speech with which some of my colleagues at Public Citizen disagree. Beyond that, the question is whether the plaintiff has a tenable claim and whether – for all sorts of claims that may be made against speech, there are degrees of validity and degrees of protection, and I have to assess two things, really. First of all, is the speech legally defensible? And will defending the speech in a particular instance help advance the law by making it easier for other speakers? And really, both conditions have to be met for me to take a case.
Links:
- Tom Lehrer: “Smut”
- The Dendrite case
- Links to others of his cases at
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Alan_Levy - Carole Cadwalladr’s SLAPP case
- British Chiropractic Association vs Simon Singh
- net.wars on the Singh win on appeal
- “If Your Tivo Think’s You’re Gay, Here’s How to Set It Straight”
- Cory Doctorow’s postings on enshittification
- Serious Trouble
The post Paul Alan Levy: Defending Free Speech first appeared on Plutopia News Network.
274 에피소드
Manage episode 517601038 series 2292604
Paul Alan Levy, a public interest attorney at Public Citizen, specializes in defending internet-related free speech cases, particularly those involving individuals targeted by lawsuits for their online expression. While personally committed to protecting all forms of speech, Levy balances this ideal with the progressive values of his organization. He only takes cases when the speech is legally defensible and advancing the case could help set a broader legal precedent. Throughout his career, Levy has developed legal strategies, like the influential Dendrite test, to protect anonymous online speakers from frivolous or strategic lawsuits intended to silence them (SLAPP suits). He warns against threats to online speech, such as efforts to dismantle Section 230 protections, and emphasizes the need for libel insurance for content creators. Despite the growing challenges posed by powerful individuals, corporations, and shifting legal standards, Levy continues to advocate for robust protections of free expression in the digital age.
Paul Alan Levy:
I like the idea of protecting speech of all kinds, even if I potentially disagree with it, although I’m constrained by the fact that I work for Public Citizen, which is a progressive organization which isn’t always happy with my defending speech with which some of my colleagues at Public Citizen disagree. Beyond that, the question is whether the plaintiff has a tenable claim and whether – for all sorts of claims that may be made against speech, there are degrees of validity and degrees of protection, and I have to assess two things, really. First of all, is the speech legally defensible? And will defending the speech in a particular instance help advance the law by making it easier for other speakers? And really, both conditions have to be met for me to take a case.
Links:
- Tom Lehrer: “Smut”
- The Dendrite case
- Links to others of his cases at
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Alan_Levy - Carole Cadwalladr’s SLAPP case
- British Chiropractic Association vs Simon Singh
- net.wars on the Singh win on appeal
- “If Your Tivo Think’s You’re Gay, Here’s How to Set It Straight”
- Cory Doctorow’s postings on enshittification
- Serious Trouble
The post Paul Alan Levy: Defending Free Speech first appeared on Plutopia News Network.
274 에피소드
Todos os episódios
×플레이어 FM에 오신것을 환영합니다!
플레이어 FM은 웹에서 고품질 팟캐스트를 검색하여 지금 바로 즐길 수 있도록 합니다. 최고의 팟캐스트 앱이며 Android, iPhone 및 웹에서도 작동합니다. 장치 간 구독 동기화를 위해 가입하세요.