Artwork

Rhodri Davies에서 제공하는 콘텐츠입니다. 에피소드, 그래픽, 팟캐스트 설명을 포함한 모든 팟캐스트 콘텐츠는 Rhodri Davies 또는 해당 팟캐스트 플랫폼 파트너가 직접 업로드하고 제공합니다. 누군가가 귀하의 허락 없이 귀하의 저작물을 사용하고 있다고 생각되는 경우 여기에 설명된 절차를 따르실 수 있습니다 https://ko.player.fm/legal.
Player FM -팟 캐스트 앱
Player FM 앱으로 오프라인으로 전환하세요!

Patricia Illingworth: Philanthropy & Human Rights

49:05
 
공유
 

Manage episode 365509061 series 2996310
Rhodri Davies에서 제공하는 콘텐츠입니다. 에피소드, 그래픽, 팟캐스트 설명을 포함한 모든 팟캐스트 콘텐츠는 Rhodri Davies 또는 해당 팟캐스트 플랫폼 파트너가 직접 업로드하고 제공합니다. 누군가가 귀하의 허락 없이 귀하의 저작물을 사용하고 있다고 생각되는 경우 여기에 설명된 절차를 따르실 수 있습니다 https://ko.player.fm/legal.

On this episode, we talk to philosopher and lawyer Patricia Illingworth about her recent book Giving Now: Accelerating Human Rights for All, and about how we can apply the framework of human rights to some of the big questions about the nature and role of philanthropy. Including:

  • What does it mean to use human rights as a framework for understanding donor responsibilities?
  • Is philanthropy a choice or a duty?
  • Do human rights responsibilities apply to all philanthropy, or just a certain portion of it? If a donor has given substantially to rights-furthering causes, is it acceptable for them to give additionally in a different way?
  • Would an idealized world still contain philanthropy, or would it be one in which all philanthropy was unnecessary? If there was still some philanthropy in an idealized world, what kind would it be?
  • Is the rise of “purpose-driven business” and “compassionate capitalism” something we should welcome or be sceptical about?
  • Should nonprofits always reject tainted donations, or is it possible to “turn bad money into good”?
  • Can a human rights lens help us to determine whether source of wealth are tainted, and what course of action we should take?
  • In cases where wealth itself isn’t tainted through its mode of creation, but the donor may be ethically problematic, is it more or less acceptable to take the money?
  • What is “moral self-licensing” and why does it provide a basis for thinking that nonprofits should not accept untainted money from tainted donors?
  • Do charities or funders that make use of “poverty porn” infringe on the human rights of recipients? What does this mean for nonprofit fundraising?
  • Can philanthropy be used to strengthen democracy, or is it inherently anti-democratic?
  • How can a human rights lens help us to determine when philanthropy is acting positively even though it is running counter to democracy?
  • Why is a philosophical perspective on philanthropy valuable/important?

Related Links:

  continue reading

64 에피소드

Artwork
icon공유
 
Manage episode 365509061 series 2996310
Rhodri Davies에서 제공하는 콘텐츠입니다. 에피소드, 그래픽, 팟캐스트 설명을 포함한 모든 팟캐스트 콘텐츠는 Rhodri Davies 또는 해당 팟캐스트 플랫폼 파트너가 직접 업로드하고 제공합니다. 누군가가 귀하의 허락 없이 귀하의 저작물을 사용하고 있다고 생각되는 경우 여기에 설명된 절차를 따르실 수 있습니다 https://ko.player.fm/legal.

On this episode, we talk to philosopher and lawyer Patricia Illingworth about her recent book Giving Now: Accelerating Human Rights for All, and about how we can apply the framework of human rights to some of the big questions about the nature and role of philanthropy. Including:

  • What does it mean to use human rights as a framework for understanding donor responsibilities?
  • Is philanthropy a choice or a duty?
  • Do human rights responsibilities apply to all philanthropy, or just a certain portion of it? If a donor has given substantially to rights-furthering causes, is it acceptable for them to give additionally in a different way?
  • Would an idealized world still contain philanthropy, or would it be one in which all philanthropy was unnecessary? If there was still some philanthropy in an idealized world, what kind would it be?
  • Is the rise of “purpose-driven business” and “compassionate capitalism” something we should welcome or be sceptical about?
  • Should nonprofits always reject tainted donations, or is it possible to “turn bad money into good”?
  • Can a human rights lens help us to determine whether source of wealth are tainted, and what course of action we should take?
  • In cases where wealth itself isn’t tainted through its mode of creation, but the donor may be ethically problematic, is it more or less acceptable to take the money?
  • What is “moral self-licensing” and why does it provide a basis for thinking that nonprofits should not accept untainted money from tainted donors?
  • Do charities or funders that make use of “poverty porn” infringe on the human rights of recipients? What does this mean for nonprofit fundraising?
  • Can philanthropy be used to strengthen democracy, or is it inherently anti-democratic?
  • How can a human rights lens help us to determine when philanthropy is acting positively even though it is running counter to democracy?
  • Why is a philosophical perspective on philanthropy valuable/important?

Related Links:

  continue reading

64 에피소드

Kaikki jaksot

×
 
Loading …

플레이어 FM에 오신것을 환영합니다!

플레이어 FM은 웹에서 고품질 팟캐스트를 검색하여 지금 바로 즐길 수 있도록 합니다. 최고의 팟캐스트 앱이며 Android, iPhone 및 웹에서도 작동합니다. 장치 간 구독 동기화를 위해 가입하세요.

 

빠른 참조 가이드