Artwork

Rhodri Davies에서 제공하는 콘텐츠입니다. 에피소드, 그래픽, 팟캐스트 설명을 포함한 모든 팟캐스트 콘텐츠는 Rhodri Davies 또는 해당 팟캐스트 플랫폼 파트너가 직접 업로드하고 제공합니다. 누군가가 귀하의 허락 없이 귀하의 저작물을 사용하고 있다고 생각되는 경우 여기에 설명된 절차를 따르실 수 있습니다 https://ko.player.fm/legal.
Player FM -팟 캐스트 앱
Player FM 앱으로 오프라인으로 전환하세요!

Fozia Irfan: Transformative Philanthropy

1:00:19
 
공유
 

Manage episode 417311266 series 2996310
Rhodri Davies에서 제공하는 콘텐츠입니다. 에피소드, 그래픽, 팟캐스트 설명을 포함한 모든 팟캐스트 콘텐츠는 Rhodri Davies 또는 해당 팟캐스트 플랫폼 파트너가 직접 업로드하고 제공합니다. 누군가가 귀하의 허락 없이 귀하의 저작물을 사용하고 있다고 생각되는 경우 여기에 설명된 절차를 따르실 수 있습니다 https://ko.player.fm/legal.

In this episode we talk to Fozia Irfan OBE, Director of Impact & Influence at BBC Children in Need and recent Churchill Fellow, about her report Transformative Philanthropy: A Manual for Social Change, and about how philanthropy in the UK needs to change if it is to become a better tool for delivering social justice. Including:

  • What does it mean to apply a social justice framing to philanthropy?
  • Is this applicable to all foundations, regardless of cause area?
  • Is the conversation about philanthropy reform more sophisticated in the US?
  • Why is historical perspective important for funders when it comes to understanding their cause areas and the role of philanthropy?
  • Why do funders need to understand the different philosophical traditions that might underpin a focus on social justice?
  • Why is it so important for funders to express a clear and specific vision? Are there examples of organisations that do this well already?
  • What does it mean for funders to be community-centric?
  • What does it mean to take an intersectional view of issues, and why is it important?
  • Why should foundations engage in movement building?
  • Is the current enthusiasm for social movements reflective of a frustration people have that traditional nonprofits have failed to move the needle on issues such as the climate crisis or racial justice?
  • Does the ability of social movements to be more overtly political, or to employ more challenging tactics (e.g. protest, direct action), give them an advantage over civil society organisations (CSOs) that might be more constrained by legal/regulatory requirements?
  • What does it mean for foundations to be cross-sectoral and multi-dimensional? Why are they not currently doing this?
  • Do we look at institutional philanthropy too narrowly through the lens of grantmaking, and thus fail to take into account the importance of other potential tools (e.g. campaigning, storytelling etc)?
  • Why is it important to understand the historic roots of the wealth, institutions and practices we have in philanthropy?
  • What should philanthropic orgs do about links to historic racial injustices? Is it enough to acknowledge them, or do they need to go beyond that and seek means to make reparations somehow?
  • Should we take a pragmatic approach to improving philanthropy (i.e. working with existing structures to improve them) or "burn everything to the ground" as some more radical voices argue we should?

Related Links

  continue reading

64 에피소드

Artwork
icon공유
 
Manage episode 417311266 series 2996310
Rhodri Davies에서 제공하는 콘텐츠입니다. 에피소드, 그래픽, 팟캐스트 설명을 포함한 모든 팟캐스트 콘텐츠는 Rhodri Davies 또는 해당 팟캐스트 플랫폼 파트너가 직접 업로드하고 제공합니다. 누군가가 귀하의 허락 없이 귀하의 저작물을 사용하고 있다고 생각되는 경우 여기에 설명된 절차를 따르실 수 있습니다 https://ko.player.fm/legal.

In this episode we talk to Fozia Irfan OBE, Director of Impact & Influence at BBC Children in Need and recent Churchill Fellow, about her report Transformative Philanthropy: A Manual for Social Change, and about how philanthropy in the UK needs to change if it is to become a better tool for delivering social justice. Including:

  • What does it mean to apply a social justice framing to philanthropy?
  • Is this applicable to all foundations, regardless of cause area?
  • Is the conversation about philanthropy reform more sophisticated in the US?
  • Why is historical perspective important for funders when it comes to understanding their cause areas and the role of philanthropy?
  • Why do funders need to understand the different philosophical traditions that might underpin a focus on social justice?
  • Why is it so important for funders to express a clear and specific vision? Are there examples of organisations that do this well already?
  • What does it mean for funders to be community-centric?
  • What does it mean to take an intersectional view of issues, and why is it important?
  • Why should foundations engage in movement building?
  • Is the current enthusiasm for social movements reflective of a frustration people have that traditional nonprofits have failed to move the needle on issues such as the climate crisis or racial justice?
  • Does the ability of social movements to be more overtly political, or to employ more challenging tactics (e.g. protest, direct action), give them an advantage over civil society organisations (CSOs) that might be more constrained by legal/regulatory requirements?
  • What does it mean for foundations to be cross-sectoral and multi-dimensional? Why are they not currently doing this?
  • Do we look at institutional philanthropy too narrowly through the lens of grantmaking, and thus fail to take into account the importance of other potential tools (e.g. campaigning, storytelling etc)?
  • Why is it important to understand the historic roots of the wealth, institutions and practices we have in philanthropy?
  • What should philanthropic orgs do about links to historic racial injustices? Is it enough to acknowledge them, or do they need to go beyond that and seek means to make reparations somehow?
  • Should we take a pragmatic approach to improving philanthropy (i.e. working with existing structures to improve them) or "burn everything to the ground" as some more radical voices argue we should?

Related Links

  continue reading

64 에피소드

모든 에피소드

×
 
Loading …

플레이어 FM에 오신것을 환영합니다!

플레이어 FM은 웹에서 고품질 팟캐스트를 검색하여 지금 바로 즐길 수 있도록 합니다. 최고의 팟캐스트 앱이며 Android, iPhone 및 웹에서도 작동합니다. 장치 간 구독 동기화를 위해 가입하세요.

 

빠른 참조 가이드