Artwork

Rhodri Davies에서 제공하는 콘텐츠입니다. 에피소드, 그래픽, 팟캐스트 설명을 포함한 모든 팟캐스트 콘텐츠는 Rhodri Davies 또는 해당 팟캐스트 플랫폼 파트너가 직접 업로드하고 제공합니다. 누군가가 귀하의 허락 없이 귀하의 저작물을 사용하고 있다고 생각되는 경우 여기에 설명된 절차를 따르실 수 있습니다 https://ko.player.fm/legal.
Player FM -팟 캐스트 앱
Player FM 앱으로 오프라인으로 전환하세요!

Dr Ewan Kirk - philanthropy & giving 'permission to fail'

49:31
 
공유
 

Manage episode 361835805 series 2996310
Rhodri Davies에서 제공하는 콘텐츠입니다. 에피소드, 그래픽, 팟캐스트 설명을 포함한 모든 팟캐스트 콘텐츠는 Rhodri Davies 또는 해당 팟캐스트 플랫폼 파트너가 직접 업로드하고 제공합니다. 누군가가 귀하의 허락 없이 귀하의 저작물을 사용하고 있다고 생각되는 경우 여기에 설명된 절차를 따르실 수 있습니다 https://ko.player.fm/legal.

In this episode we talk to philanthropist Dr Ewan Kirk, founder of the Turner Kirk Trust, about why he believes it is so important that philanthropists are willing to take risks and give the organisations they support 'permission to fail'. Including:

  • Why is it so important to give charities permission to fail?
  • What factors make something a “good” failure rather than a “bad” one?
  • What is the nature of the risk in philanthropy?
  • Is philanthropy as a whole too risk averse?
  • Can we do anything to encourage donors/funders to take more risks and be willing to “fail”?
  • Why is it important, in terms of giving charities the freedom to take risks, that we get away from asking them to deliver specific outcomes?
  • Should we still try to gauge the effectiveness/success of funding?
  • Would more unrestricted funding help to foster a culture of risk taking and innovation?
  • When looking for genuinely transformative solutions to long-standing problems, it is necessary to support ‘upstream’ work (e.g. research, policy and advocacy) as well as ‘downstream’ work (e.g. direct interventions)?
  • Is there sometimes a danger that philanthropists go too far in looking for “big bets” or “moonshots”, and overlook more immediate issues and potential solutions as a result?
  • Is it necessary to rein this tendency in at all? (i.e. to set parameters for what is “acceptable risk” when it comes to deploying philanthropic resources?)
  • If one of the potential “exits” for risk-taking philanthropists is to get the state to adopt innovations or change the way it does things, what is best way of ensuring that this happens?
  • If philanthropy genuinely has a higher risk tolerance than the public sector, why is that?
  • Could the state itself become more risk-tolerant, or will it always need philanthropy?

Related links:

  continue reading

70 에피소드

Artwork
icon공유
 
Manage episode 361835805 series 2996310
Rhodri Davies에서 제공하는 콘텐츠입니다. 에피소드, 그래픽, 팟캐스트 설명을 포함한 모든 팟캐스트 콘텐츠는 Rhodri Davies 또는 해당 팟캐스트 플랫폼 파트너가 직접 업로드하고 제공합니다. 누군가가 귀하의 허락 없이 귀하의 저작물을 사용하고 있다고 생각되는 경우 여기에 설명된 절차를 따르실 수 있습니다 https://ko.player.fm/legal.

In this episode we talk to philanthropist Dr Ewan Kirk, founder of the Turner Kirk Trust, about why he believes it is so important that philanthropists are willing to take risks and give the organisations they support 'permission to fail'. Including:

  • Why is it so important to give charities permission to fail?
  • What factors make something a “good” failure rather than a “bad” one?
  • What is the nature of the risk in philanthropy?
  • Is philanthropy as a whole too risk averse?
  • Can we do anything to encourage donors/funders to take more risks and be willing to “fail”?
  • Why is it important, in terms of giving charities the freedom to take risks, that we get away from asking them to deliver specific outcomes?
  • Should we still try to gauge the effectiveness/success of funding?
  • Would more unrestricted funding help to foster a culture of risk taking and innovation?
  • When looking for genuinely transformative solutions to long-standing problems, it is necessary to support ‘upstream’ work (e.g. research, policy and advocacy) as well as ‘downstream’ work (e.g. direct interventions)?
  • Is there sometimes a danger that philanthropists go too far in looking for “big bets” or “moonshots”, and overlook more immediate issues and potential solutions as a result?
  • Is it necessary to rein this tendency in at all? (i.e. to set parameters for what is “acceptable risk” when it comes to deploying philanthropic resources?)
  • If one of the potential “exits” for risk-taking philanthropists is to get the state to adopt innovations or change the way it does things, what is best way of ensuring that this happens?
  • If philanthropy genuinely has a higher risk tolerance than the public sector, why is that?
  • Could the state itself become more risk-tolerant, or will it always need philanthropy?

Related links:

  continue reading

70 에피소드

Όλα τα επεισόδια

×
 
Loading …

플레이어 FM에 오신것을 환영합니다!

플레이어 FM은 웹에서 고품질 팟캐스트를 검색하여 지금 바로 즐길 수 있도록 합니다. 최고의 팟캐스트 앱이며 Android, iPhone 및 웹에서도 작동합니다. 장치 간 구독 동기화를 위해 가입하세요.

 

빠른 참조 가이드