Litigation Nation podcast

Player FM - Internet Radio Done Right

추가했습니다 three 년 전

Amundsen Davis, LLC, Amundsen Davis, and LLC에서 제공하는 콘텐츠입니다. 에피소드, 그래픽, 팟캐스트 설명을 포함한 모든 팟캐스트 콘텐츠는 Amundsen Davis, LLC, Amundsen Davis, and LLC 또는 해당 팟캐스트 플랫폼 파트너가 직접 업로드하고 제공합니다. 누군가가 귀하의 허락 없이 귀하의 저작물을 사용하고 있다고 생각되는 경우 여기에 설명된 절차를 따르실 수 있습니다 https://ko.player.fm/legal.

Mind The Business: Small Business Success Stories

1
Understanding Taxes as a Newly Formed Small Business - Part 2 of the Small Business Starter Kit 28:24

16일 전28:24

나중에 재생

리스트

28:24

In our second installment of the Small Business Starter Kit series - we’re tackling a topic that’s sometimes tricky, sometimes confusing, but ever-present: taxes. Hosts Austin and Jannese have an insightful conversation with entrepreneur Isabella Rosal who started 7th Sky Ventures , an exporter and distributor of craft spirits, beer, and wine. Having lived and worked in two different countries and started a company in a heavily-regulated field, Isabella is no stranger to navigating the paperwork-laden and jargon-infused maze of properly understanding taxes for a newly formed small business. Join us as she shares her story and provides valuable insight into how to tackle your business’ taxes - so they don’t tackle you. Learn more about how QuickBooks can help you grow your business: QuickBooks.com See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.…

Litigation Nation

시리즈 홈•Feed

The Litigation Nation Podcast, hosted by Jack Sanker & Danessa Watkins, is a roundup of the most important and interesting legal developments happening right now, giving you an insider’s view to the legal system. If you haven't already, be sure to subscribe to Litigation Nation wherever you listen to podcasts, so you never miss an episode.

64 에피소드

#News #Law #Litigation #Court #Attorney #Judge #Case #Business News #Amundsen Davis, LLC #Amundsen Davis #LLC #Business #Lawyers

Litigation Nation

updated 4일 전

시리즈 홈•Feed

64 에피소드

#News #Law #Litigation #Court #Attorney #Judge #Case #Business News #Amundsen Davis, LLC #Amundsen Davis #LLC #Business #Lawyers

모든 에피소드

Litigation Nation

1
Protests, Tariffs, and the First Amendment: The Ripple Effects of Policy Changes - Ep. 63 54:38

4일 전54:38

나중에 재생

리스트

54:38

In this episode of Litigation Nation, co-hosts Jack Sanker and Danessa Watkins dive into two significant legal topics currently making headlines. First, Danessa discusses the First Amendment implications of President Trump's announcement regarding federal funding for schools and universities that permit illegal protests. Trump’s controversial post on Truth Social threatens to cut off federal funding for educational institutions that allow such protests, raising concerns about free speech rights and the potential chilling effect on student activism. The discussion highlights the complexities of defining what constitutes an illegal protest and the responsibilities of educational institutions under the First Amendment. They explore the potential legal ramifications of Trump's statements, including the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression's assertion that the president cannot compel institutions to expel students. Next, Jack shifts the conversation to the ongoing issue of tariffs and their impact on the construction industry. He shares insights from a recent Law360 survey of real estate and construction attorneys, emphasizing the practical effects of new tariffs on materials like steel and aluminum. The hosts discuss how fluctuating tariffs create uncertainty in pricing and contracting, making it essential for businesses to include protective clauses in their contracts. They also touch on the challenges of navigating existing contracts in light of new tariffs and the potential for litigation as businesses seek relief from increased costs. Join us as we take a comprehensive look at the intersection of free speech, government action, and economic implications in the current legal landscape.…

Litigation Nation

1
Digital Dilemma: How a Court Ruling Could Change Library E-Book Access Forever - Ep. 62 33:05

18일 전33:05

나중에 재생

리스트

33:05

In this episode of Litigation Nation, co-hosts Danessa Watkins and Jack Sanker dive into a significant ruling from the U.S. Second Circuit that could drastically impact how local libraries lend electronic books. The discussion centers around a lawsuit involving the Internet Archive and major publishers like Hatchett, HarperCollins, and Penguin Random House, which has raised critical questions about copyright infringement and the future of digital lending in libraries. We explore the traditional model of library lending, where physical books can be borrowed freely, compared to the restrictive and costly nature of digital lending. Libraries often face high fees for e-books, which are time-limited and loan-limited, making it increasingly difficult to provide access to digital materials. The Internet Archive's approach of controlled digital lending—where a physical book is scanned and lent out digitally while the physical copy is sequestered—was challenged in court, leading to a permanent injunction against this practice. The hosts discuss the implications of the court's ruling, which rejected the Internet Archive's argument for fair use, stating that digitizing books did not transform them in a way that would qualify for this legal exemption. This decision could lead to increased costs for libraries, forcing them to repeatedly purchase e-books rather than lending them freely, ultimately affecting their ability to serve the community. Throughout the episode, we highlight the broader issues facing libraries today, including funding shortfalls and the rising costs of digital materials, which could diminish their role in providing accessible knowledge. We encourage listeners to support their local libraries and reflect on the importance of these institutions in our communities. Join us as we unpack this complex legal landscape and its potential consequences for libraries and their patrons.…

Litigation Nation

1
When Art Meets Law: Analyzing Drake's Defamation Case Against UMG - Ep. 61 55:21

5 weeks 전55:21

나중에 재생

리스트

55:21

In this episode of Litigation Nation, co-hosts Danessa Watkins and Jack Sanker return from a brief hiatus to delve into two significant legal topics making headlines: recent tariffs imposed by the Trump administration and a high-profile defamation lawsuit involving music industry giants Drake and Kendrick Lamar. We kick off the episode with Jack discussing the newly announced tariffs on steel and aluminum imports, which are set to take effect on March 12, 2025. He explains the implications of these tariffs, including a substantial increase from 10% to 25%, and how they will affect various industries, particularly construction. Jack highlights the statutory powers granted to the president by Congress, specifically referencing the Trade Expansion Act of 1962, which allows for such tariff increases under the guise of national security. He emphasizes the potential consequences for businesses reliant on international imports, including price hikes and shortages, and discusses the lack of existing contractual provisions to address these sudden changes in material costs. For the latest on International Trade, Amundsen Davis's Ngosong Fonkem has multiple legal write-ups that can be read on www.amundsendavislaw.com. Transitioning to the second segment, Danessa takes the reins to cover the ongoing defamation lawsuit filed by Drake against UMG Recordings, Inc. The lawsuit stems from a heated feud between Drake and Kendrick Lamar, which escalated into a series of diss tracks and public accusations. Danessa outlines the timeline of events leading to the lawsuit, including violent incidents that occurred at Drake's home, which he attributes to the fallout from the feud and UMG's actions in promoting Kendrick's diss track, "Not Like Us." The hosts analyze the unique nature of the lawsuit, noting that Drake has chosen to sue the record label rather than Kendrick himself. Danessa discusses the creative and visually engaging nature of Drake's complaint, which includes graphic elements and a dramatic introduction detailing the threats to his safety. The episode explores the legal complexities of defamation, particularly the requirement for public figures like Drake to prove actual malice on the part of UMG. Danessa and Jack emphasize the importance of understanding the legal ramifications of both the tariff situation and the defamation lawsuit, encouraging listeners to stay informed about these evolving issues. They remind the audience to consult legal professionals for guidance in navigating these complex matters, particularly those in the construction industry facing the fallout from the new tariffs.…

Litigation Nation

1
An AI chatbot pushed a teen to kill himself, a lawsuit against its creator alleges - Ep. 60 54:49

21 weeks 전54:49

나중에 재생

리스트

54:49

EDITOR’S NOTE — This story includes discussion of suicide. If you or someone you know needs help, the national suicide and crisis lifeline in the U.S. is available by calling or texting 988. In this episode of Litigation Nation, co-hosts Danessa Watkins and Jack Sanker dive into two significant legal stories that highlight the intersection of technology, ethics, and the law. We begin with a high-profile criminal case in Georgia involving rapper Young Thug, whose real name is Jeffrey Williams. The case has garnered attention not only for its lengthy duration—now the longest criminal trial in Georgia's history—but also for the controversial use of rap lyrics as evidence in court. Danessa provides an update on a recent ruling from the Georgia Supreme Court that overturned a contempt conviction against Young Thug's attorney, Brian Steele. The ruling stemmed from an improper ex parte communication between the judge and a key witness, which raised serious concerns about due process and the integrity of the trial. The hosts analyze the implications of this ruling and the broader issues surrounding the criminal justice system's treatment of artists and their work. In the second segment, we shift gears to discuss a tragic case involving the death of a 14-year-old boy from Orlando, Florida, who developed an emotional attachment to an AI chatbot on the platform Character.ai. His mother has since filed a lawsuit against the company, alleging that it misrepresented the chatbot as a real person and a licensed psychotherapist, ultimately leading to her son's tragic decision to take his own life after he spent months interacting with a chatbot designed to mimic Daenerys Targaryen from Game of Thrones. The episode explores the implications of AI companionship, particularly for vulnerable youth, and raises questions about the responsibilities of tech companies in safeguarding their users. Join us as we unpack these complex issues and their far-reaching consequences in today's society.…

Litigation Nation

1
The ‘Baby Reindeer’ defamation lawsuit against Netflix hinges on a single line: ‘This is a true story’ - Ep. 59 1:13:06

23 weeks 전1:13:06

나중에 재생

리스트

1:13:06

In this episode of Litigation Nation, co-hosts Jack Sanker and Danessa Watkins dive into two significant legal developments. First, Danessa discusses the defamation lawsuit stemming from the Netflix miniseries "Baby Reindeer," which follows the tumultuous life of a Scottish comedian and his stalker. The series, based on the real-life experiences of comedian Richard Gadd, has sparked controversy after a woman named Fiona Harvey claimed the character Martha Scott was based on her. Harvey has filed a lawsuit against Netflix, alleging defamation and emotional distress, among other claims. Netflix has responded with a motion to dismiss, citing the anti-SLAPP statute, arguing that the portrayal of Harvey is substantially true. The court's opinion reveals the complexities of the case, including the similarities between the character and Harvey, and the implications of Netflix's claim that the series is a true story. Next, we shift our focus to the wave of lawsuits filed against TikTok by multiple state attorneys general, including Illinois. These lawsuits allege that TikTok's business practices are harmful to young users, promoting addictive behavior and mental health issues. The complaints highlight TikTok's algorithm, features like infinite scrolling, and the platform's marketing strategies that target vulnerable youth. The Illinois Attorney General, Kwame Raoul, emphasizes the need to hold TikTok accountable for prioritizing profits over the well-being of children. Join us as we unpack these intriguing legal battles and explore the implications for both Netflix and TikTok in the ever-evolving landscape of media and technology.…

Litigation Nation

1
The Future of Legal Testimony: Embracing Technology in Litigation With Karl Seelbach - Ep. 58 57:56

26 weeks 전57:56

나중에 재생

리스트

57:56

Join us in this episode of Litigation Nation as host Jack Sankar and co-host Danessa Watkins welcome special guest Karl Seelbach, founder of Doyle & Seelbach and tech innovator behind Skribe.ai , a revolutionary deposition technology. With a wealth of experience in both law and technology, Karl shares his insights on the intersection of legal practice and innovation. In this episode, we dive deep into: Karl's journey from practicing attorney to tech entrepreneur The evolution of his law firm and the challenges of starting fresh The inspiration behind Skribe.ai and how it aims to revolutionize the deposition process The benefits of non-stenographic depositions and the role of technology in modern litigation The impact of AI on the legal profession and how attorneys can adapt to stay relevant Whether you're a legal professional, a tech enthusiast, or just curious about the future of law, this episode is packed with valuable insights and practical advice. Don't forget to like, subscribe, and hit the notification bell to stay updated on our latest episodes! Litigation Nation listeners interested in 25% off of their first upload with Skribe.ai, please email Karl@Skribe.ai , and let him know you heard about Skribe.ai from the show, and would like to give it a try! Find Karl Seelbach: LinkedIn: Karl Seelbach X/Twitter: @KarlSeelbach Email: Karl@skribe.ai…

Litigation Nation

1
OnlyFans Class Action Claims Site Allows ‘chatters’ to Impersonate Content Creators, Deceiving Subscribers - Ep. 57 45:22

28 weeks 전45:22

나중에 재생

리스트

45:22

Welcome to this episode of Litigation Nation ! Join hosts Danessa Watkins and Jack Sanker as they dive into the most intriguing legal news from across the country. In this episode, we discuss: A class action lawsuit against OnlyFans for alleged fraud and violations of federal racketeering statutes due to the use of online impersonators posing as models to scam subscribers. The new Illinois law requiring influencer parents to compensate their children for appearing in social media content, marking a significant shift in child labor laws. The ongoing family feud within the Murdoch family as Rupert Murdoch seeks to change the trust arrangement for his media empire, potentially favoring his son Lachlan over his other children. Tune in for a deep dive into these fascinating topics at the intersection of technology, the influencer economy, and media mogul dynamics. Don't forget to subscribe for more exciting legal discussions every two weeks! Listen on: Apple Podcasts, Spotify, YouTube, and wherever you get your podcasts!…

Litigation Nation

1
The Curious Case of Disney's Mandatory Arbitration Provision in Wrongful Death Lawsuit - Ep. 56 28:46

31 weeks 전28:46

나중에 재생

리스트

28:46

Welcome to Litigation Nation! In this episode, hosts Danessa Watkins and Jack Sanker dive into two intriguing legal cases. First, they discuss Disney's attempt to enforce a mandatory arbitration provision in a wrongful death case stemming from an allergic reaction at Disney World. Then, they explore the allegations of sexual misconduct and medical malpractice in a lawsuit filed against WWE's Vince McMahon. Join them as they dissect the legal intricacies and questionable decisions made by the parties involved. Tune in every other week for new episodes on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, YouTube, and more. Don't miss out on the latest legal insights and court opinions from across the country! (00:00) - Intro (01:20) - Disney wants to dismiss a wrongful death lawsuit because of a Disney Plus agreement (13:50) - Former WWE employee suing Vince McMahon seeks medical records in defamation lawsuit (27:55) - Outro…

Litigation Nation

1
The Legal and Ethical Implications of Border Technologies and Human Rights with Petra Molnar - Ep. 55 1:00:08

33 weeks 전1:00:08

나중에 재생

리스트

1:00:08

In this episode of Litigation Nation, we delve into the complex world of border security, migration, and the impact of artificial intelligence with special guest Petra Molnar, a lawyer, author, and anthropologist. Petra's extensive experience in conflict areas and militarized spaces around the world has provided her with unique insights into the intersection of technology and human rights. The episode also delves into the regulatory landscape of artificial intelligence in border security, with a focus on the European Union's AI Act and its implications for governing AI technologies. Petra raises concerns about the loopholes in the legislation and the need for stronger regulations to protect human rights. Read The Walls Have Eyes: Surviving Migration in the Age of Artificial Intelligence here : www.bit.ly/LNBookshop Learn more about Petra and her work by visiting: www.PetraMolnar.com…

Litigation Nation

1
So About That Recent Supreme Court Presidential Immunity Decision... - Ep. 54 1:16:55

35 weeks 전1:16:55

나중에 재생

리스트

1:16:55

In this episode we discuss what the Supreme Court immunity ruling means for Trump, and Supreme Court denial of certiorari in case brought against OSHA. (00:00) - - Intro (01:15) - - Supreme Court immunity ruling (57:30) - - Supreme Court denial of certiorari in OSHA case (01:16:27) - - Outro

Litigation Nation

1
What happens now that Trump has been convicted in his hush money criminal case - Ep. 53 53:52

37 weeks 전53:52

나중에 재생

리스트

53:52

Litigation Nation hosts Jack Sanker and Danessa Watkins dive into the recent landmark verdict finding Trump guilty of 34 charges of falsifying business records. They also explore the nuances of the case, including the jury's decision, sentencing considerations, and the possibility of Trump running for president despite the conviction. Join our discussion on the legal implications, potential appeals, and the impact on the political landscape in the comments below. Special thanks to summer intern Ava Rosenberg for her research contributions to this episode. Tune in for a thought-provoking discussion on the complexities of high-profile legal cases and the impact on our society. (00:00) - Intro (01:09) - What happens now with Trump's 34 Felony Convictions (53:11) - Outro…

Litigation Nation

1
PFAS: The Widespread Contamination of 'Forever Chemicals' Found Everywhere From Rainwater to Newborns - Ep. 52 1:02:12

39 weeks 전1:02:12

나중에 재생

리스트

1:02:12

In this episode, we discuss the widespread contamination of "forever chemicals" detailed in a bombshell expose by ProPublica and The New Yorker and the legal troubles faced by OpenAI, including allegations of using Scarlett Johansson's voice in their AI assistant technology and copyright infringement claims from authors like George R.R. Martin. (00:00) - Intro (01:30) - PFAS 'Forever Chemicals' Are Everywhere (34:29) - OpenAI & Copyright Infringement (01:01:36) - Outro…

Litigation Nation

1
Tesla Under Investigation for Securities Fraud & The FBI's Failures in the Larry Nassar Case - Ep. 51 39:01

41 weeks 전39:01

나중에 재생

리스트

39:01

Tesla Securities and Wire Fraud Investigation: The episode kicks off with a deep dive into the ongoing investigation surrounding Tesla's marketing efforts and statements made by its CEO, Elon Musk, regarding the company's self-driving capabilities. The Department of Justice and the SEC are scrutinizing Tesla's claims about full self-driving features and the timeline for their release. The investigation raises questions about market manipulation and the impact of Musk's statements on Tesla's stock price. DOJ Settlement in Larry Nassar Case: The episode also covers a $138.7 million settlement reached by the Justice Department over the FBI's failures in the Larry Nassar case. Nassar, a former doctor, was accused of sexually abusing hundreds of women and girls, including athletes. The settlement covers 139 claims from survivors who alleged that the FBI failed to investigate or take action despite being aware of Nassar's crimes. The settlement aims to provide some compensation to the survivors and highlights the need for accountability and systemic changes within law enforcement. Analysis and Reflection: The hosts delve into the complexities of these legal cases, discussing the challenges of proving liability and the implications of the settlements. They explore the impact on the victims, the government's response, and the potential for improved training and protocols to prevent similar failures in the future. The episode concludes with a reflection on the importance of recognizing and addressing systemic failures in the legal system. Tune in to Litigation Nation for insightful discussions on the latest legal issues and updates across the nation. Subscribe to get the latest episodes, and stay informed with the ever-changing legal landscape. (00:00) - - Intro (00:50) - - Tesla Under Investigation for Securities Fraud (05:30) - - Tesla's Full Self-Driving Claims (09:30) - - Shareholder Suits Against Tesla (16:45) - - DOJ Settlement Over Larry Nassar Case (22:30) - - Impact of Settlement on Nassar Survivors (28:50) - - Comparison with Other DOJ Settlements (38:27) - - Outro…

Litigation Nation

1
The Genetics of Data Privacy and the Privacy of Genetic Data - Ep. 50 43:09

42 weeks 전43:09

나중에 재생

리스트

43:09

Data Privacy Attorney, John Ochoa, joins the show to discuss a recent lawsuit of a beverage giant under Illinois Genetic Privacy Law, and a Texas judge says drag shows aren’t always protected by First Amendment, citing the “history and tradition” test, as the legal standard for his ruling. (00:00) - Intro (01:12) - Beverage giant sued under Illinois Genetic Privacy Law (28:46) - Justices using the controversial “history and tradition” test, as a legal standard in their rulings (42:45) - Outro…

Litigation Nation

1
Revenge Porn Lawsuits and Cyber Attacks - Ep. 49 42:01

45 weeks 전42:01

나중에 재생

리스트

42:01

In this episode of Litigation Nation, we covered three significant legal developments. We discuss a case in New York where a woman was awarded $30 million in a revenge porn lawsuit against her ex-boyfriend, a cyber attack in Fulton County, Georgia, where hackers threatened to release sensitive court documents related to the Trump election case, and explore a U.S. Supreme Court decision regarding the removal of presidential candidates from state ballots. (00:00) - - Introduction to Revenge Porn Laws (05:30) - - Personal Experience with Cyberbullying Cases (10:04) - - Statistics on Revenge Porn Incidents (11:24) - - Cyber Attack on Fulton County Court (21:02) - - U.S. Supreme Court Decision on Trump Ballot Removal (33:00) - - Supreme Court Justices' Decision Making Process (36:28) - - Discussion on Section 3 of the 14th Amendment…