Artwork

LessWrong에서 제공하는 콘텐츠입니다. 에피소드, 그래픽, 팟캐스트 설명을 포함한 모든 팟캐스트 콘텐츠는 LessWrong 또는 해당 팟캐스트 플랫폼 파트너가 직접 업로드하고 제공합니다. 누군가가 귀하의 허락 없이 귀하의 저작물을 사용하고 있다고 생각되는 경우 여기에 설명된 절차를 따르실 수 있습니다 https://ko.player.fm/legal.
Player FM -팟 캐스트 앱
Player FM 앱으로 오프라인으로 전환하세요!

“Varieties Of Doom” by jdp

1:38:48
 
공유
 

Manage episode 520411481 series 3364760
LessWrong에서 제공하는 콘텐츠입니다. 에피소드, 그래픽, 팟캐스트 설명을 포함한 모든 팟캐스트 콘텐츠는 LessWrong 또는 해당 팟캐스트 플랫폼 파트너가 직접 업로드하고 제공합니다. 누군가가 귀하의 허락 없이 귀하의 저작물을 사용하고 있다고 생각되는 경우 여기에 설명된 절차를 따르실 수 있습니다 https://ko.player.fm/legal.
There has been a lot of talk about "p(doom)"over the last few years. This has always rubbed me the wrong waybecause "p(doom)" didn't feel like it mapped to any specific belief in my head.In private conversations I'd sometimes give my p(doom) as 12%, with the caveatthat "doom" seemed nebulous and conflated between several different concepts.At some point it was decideda p(doom) over 10% makes you a "doomer" because it means what actions you should take with respect toAI are overdetermined. I did not and do not feel that is true. But any time Ifelt prompted to explain my position I'd find I could explain a little bit ofthis or that, but not really convey the whole thing. As it turns out doom hasa lot of parts, and every part is entangled with every other part so no matterwhich part you explain you always feel like you're leaving the crucial parts out. Doom ismore like an onion than asingle event, a distribution over AI outcomes people frequentlyrespond to with the force of the fear of death. Some of these outcomes are lessthan death and some [...]
---
Outline:
(03:46) 1. Existential Ennui
(06:40) 2. Not Getting Immortalist Luxury Gay Space Communism
(13:55) 3. Human Stock Expended As Cannon Fodder Faster Than Replacement
(19:37) 4. Wiped Out By AI Successor Species
(27:57) 5. The Paperclipper
(42:56) Would AI Successors Be Conscious Beings?
(44:58) Would AI Successors Care About Each Other?
(49:51) Would AI Successors Want To Have Fun?
(51:11) VNM Utility And Human Values
(55:57) Would AI successors get bored?
(01:00:16) Would AI Successors Avoid Wireheading?
(01:06:07) Would AI Successors Do Continual Active Learning?
(01:06:35) Would AI Successors Have The Subjective Experience of Will?
(01:12:00) Multiply
(01:15:07) 6. Recipes For Ruin
(01:18:02) Radiological and Nuclear
(01:19:19) Cybersecurity
(01:23:00) Biotech and Nanotech
(01:26:35) 7. Large-Finite Damnation
---
First published:
November 17th, 2025
Source:
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/apHWSGDiydv3ivmg6/varieties-of-doom
---
Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO.
---
Images from the article:
Two horizontal bar charts comparing Conservative TrueSkill scores for best and worst life experiences.
Graph showing horse population decline versus car prices and horsepower from 1900-1960.
  continue reading

682 에피소드

Artwork
icon공유
 
Manage episode 520411481 series 3364760
LessWrong에서 제공하는 콘텐츠입니다. 에피소드, 그래픽, 팟캐스트 설명을 포함한 모든 팟캐스트 콘텐츠는 LessWrong 또는 해당 팟캐스트 플랫폼 파트너가 직접 업로드하고 제공합니다. 누군가가 귀하의 허락 없이 귀하의 저작물을 사용하고 있다고 생각되는 경우 여기에 설명된 절차를 따르실 수 있습니다 https://ko.player.fm/legal.
There has been a lot of talk about "p(doom)"over the last few years. This has always rubbed me the wrong waybecause "p(doom)" didn't feel like it mapped to any specific belief in my head.In private conversations I'd sometimes give my p(doom) as 12%, with the caveatthat "doom" seemed nebulous and conflated between several different concepts.At some point it was decideda p(doom) over 10% makes you a "doomer" because it means what actions you should take with respect toAI are overdetermined. I did not and do not feel that is true. But any time Ifelt prompted to explain my position I'd find I could explain a little bit ofthis or that, but not really convey the whole thing. As it turns out doom hasa lot of parts, and every part is entangled with every other part so no matterwhich part you explain you always feel like you're leaving the crucial parts out. Doom ismore like an onion than asingle event, a distribution over AI outcomes people frequentlyrespond to with the force of the fear of death. Some of these outcomes are lessthan death and some [...]
---
Outline:
(03:46) 1. Existential Ennui
(06:40) 2. Not Getting Immortalist Luxury Gay Space Communism
(13:55) 3. Human Stock Expended As Cannon Fodder Faster Than Replacement
(19:37) 4. Wiped Out By AI Successor Species
(27:57) 5. The Paperclipper
(42:56) Would AI Successors Be Conscious Beings?
(44:58) Would AI Successors Care About Each Other?
(49:51) Would AI Successors Want To Have Fun?
(51:11) VNM Utility And Human Values
(55:57) Would AI successors get bored?
(01:00:16) Would AI Successors Avoid Wireheading?
(01:06:07) Would AI Successors Do Continual Active Learning?
(01:06:35) Would AI Successors Have The Subjective Experience of Will?
(01:12:00) Multiply
(01:15:07) 6. Recipes For Ruin
(01:18:02) Radiological and Nuclear
(01:19:19) Cybersecurity
(01:23:00) Biotech and Nanotech
(01:26:35) 7. Large-Finite Damnation
---
First published:
November 17th, 2025
Source:
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/apHWSGDiydv3ivmg6/varieties-of-doom
---
Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO.
---
Images from the article:
Two horizontal bar charts comparing Conservative TrueSkill scores for best and worst life experiences.
Graph showing horse population decline versus car prices and horsepower from 1900-1960.
  continue reading

682 에피소드

모든 에피소드

×
 
Loading …

플레이어 FM에 오신것을 환영합니다!

플레이어 FM은 웹에서 고품질 팟캐스트를 검색하여 지금 바로 즐길 수 있도록 합니다. 최고의 팟캐스트 앱이며 Android, iPhone 및 웹에서도 작동합니다. 장치 간 구독 동기화를 위해 가입하세요.

 

빠른 참조 가이드

탐색하는 동안 이 프로그램을 들어보세요.
재생