Artwork

CC0/Public Domain에서 제공하는 콘텐츠입니다. 에피소드, 그래픽, 팟캐스트 설명을 포함한 모든 팟캐스트 콘텐츠는 CC0/Public Domain 또는 해당 팟캐스트 플랫폼 파트너가 직접 업로드하고 제공합니다. 누군가가 귀하의 허락 없이 귀하의 저작물을 사용하고 있다고 생각되는 경우 여기에 설명된 절차를 따르실 수 있습니다 https://ko.player.fm/legal.
Player FM -팟 캐스트 앱
Player FM 앱으로 오프라인으로 전환하세요!

Noah Weisbord on Aggression Under International Law

48:54
 
공유
 

Manage episode 240920906 series 2536565
CC0/Public Domain에서 제공하는 콘텐츠입니다. 에피소드, 그래픽, 팟캐스트 설명을 포함한 모든 팟캐스트 콘텐츠는 CC0/Public Domain 또는 해당 팟캐스트 플랫폼 파트너가 직접 업로드하고 제공합니다. 누군가가 귀하의 허락 없이 귀하의 저작물을 사용하고 있다고 생각되는 경우 여기에 설명된 절차를 따르실 수 있습니다 https://ko.player.fm/legal.

In this episode, Noah Weisbord, Associate Professor of Law at Queens University Faculty of Law, discusses his book, The Crime of Aggression: The Quest for Justice in an Age of Drones, Cyberattacks, Insurgents, and Autocrats. Weisbord begins by defining the crime of aggression, and traces its historical development from the attempts to promote peace in the 1920s through the League of Nations to its modern conception in international law. He summarizes the negotiations over the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, which established the institution, and the subsequent amendments in 2010 regarding the crime of aggression. He discusses the incorporation of the international legal norm into the domestic realm, bringing up the the prosecution of Russian servicemen for waging a war of aggression in Ukraine and the investigation of former British Prime Minister Tony Blair's conduct regarding the Iraq War by the Chilcot Inquiry.

Weisbord outlines the elements that constitute a crime of aggression, placing responsibility for unlawful uses of military force in the hands of military and political leaders. He explains the limitations of the crime, noting that cyber-attacks conducted against Iranian nuclear facilities at Natanz by the United States and Israel and the attacks on the 2016 Presidential election by Russian-linked actors do not merit retaliation for violating the international law against aggression. He reflects upon the potential abuses of the crime of aggression by state actors who might use the responsibility to protect doctrine or mis-matched retaliation to justify otherwise illicit uses of force. And he concludes by providing his insights and recommendations on the crime of aggression for the public, policymakers, and governments. Weisbord is on Twitter at @NoahWeisbord.

This episode was hosted by Luce Nguyen, a college student and the co-founder of the Oberlin Policy Research Institute, an undergraduate public policy organization based at Oberlin College. Nguyen is on Twitter at @NguyenLuce.


Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

  continue reading

819 에피소드

Artwork
icon공유
 
Manage episode 240920906 series 2536565
CC0/Public Domain에서 제공하는 콘텐츠입니다. 에피소드, 그래픽, 팟캐스트 설명을 포함한 모든 팟캐스트 콘텐츠는 CC0/Public Domain 또는 해당 팟캐스트 플랫폼 파트너가 직접 업로드하고 제공합니다. 누군가가 귀하의 허락 없이 귀하의 저작물을 사용하고 있다고 생각되는 경우 여기에 설명된 절차를 따르실 수 있습니다 https://ko.player.fm/legal.

In this episode, Noah Weisbord, Associate Professor of Law at Queens University Faculty of Law, discusses his book, The Crime of Aggression: The Quest for Justice in an Age of Drones, Cyberattacks, Insurgents, and Autocrats. Weisbord begins by defining the crime of aggression, and traces its historical development from the attempts to promote peace in the 1920s through the League of Nations to its modern conception in international law. He summarizes the negotiations over the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, which established the institution, and the subsequent amendments in 2010 regarding the crime of aggression. He discusses the incorporation of the international legal norm into the domestic realm, bringing up the the prosecution of Russian servicemen for waging a war of aggression in Ukraine and the investigation of former British Prime Minister Tony Blair's conduct regarding the Iraq War by the Chilcot Inquiry.

Weisbord outlines the elements that constitute a crime of aggression, placing responsibility for unlawful uses of military force in the hands of military and political leaders. He explains the limitations of the crime, noting that cyber-attacks conducted against Iranian nuclear facilities at Natanz by the United States and Israel and the attacks on the 2016 Presidential election by Russian-linked actors do not merit retaliation for violating the international law against aggression. He reflects upon the potential abuses of the crime of aggression by state actors who might use the responsibility to protect doctrine or mis-matched retaliation to justify otherwise illicit uses of force. And he concludes by providing his insights and recommendations on the crime of aggression for the public, policymakers, and governments. Weisbord is on Twitter at @NoahWeisbord.

This episode was hosted by Luce Nguyen, a college student and the co-founder of the Oberlin Policy Research Institute, an undergraduate public policy organization based at Oberlin College. Nguyen is on Twitter at @NguyenLuce.


Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

  continue reading

819 에피소드

모든 에피소드

×
 
Loading …

플레이어 FM에 오신것을 환영합니다!

플레이어 FM은 웹에서 고품질 팟캐스트를 검색하여 지금 바로 즐길 수 있도록 합니다. 최고의 팟캐스트 앱이며 Android, iPhone 및 웹에서도 작동합니다. 장치 간 구독 동기화를 위해 가입하세요.

 

빠른 참조 가이드

탐색하는 동안 이 프로그램을 들어보세요.
재생