The UK Column is an independent news organisation analysing the information war.
…
continue reading
International Bar Association (IBA) and IBA Global Insight에서 제공하는 콘텐츠입니다. 에피소드, 그래픽, 팟캐스트 설명을 포함한 모든 팟캐스트 콘텐츠는 International Bar Association (IBA) and IBA Global Insight 또는 해당 팟캐스트 플랫폼 파트너가 직접 업로드하고 제공합니다. 누군가가 귀하의 허락 없이 귀하의 저작물을 사용하고 있다고 생각되는 경우 여기에 설명된 절차를 따르실 수 있습니다 https://ko.player.fm/legal.
Player FM -팟 캐스트 앱
Player FM 앱으로 오프라인으로 전환하세요!
Player FM 앱으로 오프라인으로 전환하세요!
The climate crisis, human rights and the Klimaseniorinnen case
Manage episode 452253695 series 1577323
International Bar Association (IBA) and IBA Global Insight에서 제공하는 콘텐츠입니다. 에피소드, 그래픽, 팟캐스트 설명을 포함한 모든 팟캐스트 콘텐츠는 International Bar Association (IBA) and IBA Global Insight 또는 해당 팟캐스트 플랫폼 파트너가 직접 업로드하고 제공합니다. 누군가가 귀하의 허락 없이 귀하의 저작물을 사용하고 있다고 생각되는 경우 여기에 설명된 절차를 따르실 수 있습니다 https://ko.player.fm/legal.
In April 2024, a group of older Swiss women successfully argued before the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) that the Swiss government was failing to take sufficient action on climate change, violating their human rights as a disproportionately affected group under the European Convention on Human Rights. However, the Swiss parliament rejected the judgment in Klimaseniorinnen v Switzerland, claiming the ECtHR had overstepped its legal boundaries and engaged in ‘inappropriate judicial activism’, a stance later supported by the Swiss Federal Council, the country’s highest executive authority.
Switzerland has since presented a National Action Report on climate instead, which critics argue will not adequately implement the Court’s judgment.
This podcast explores the impact and fallout of the case.
With:
Switzerland has since presented a National Action Report on climate instead, which critics argue will not adequately implement the Court’s judgment.
This podcast explores the impact and fallout of the case.
With:
- Richard Harvey, Legal Counsel at Greenpeace UK
- Elizabeth Stern, claimant in KlimaSeniorinnen v Switzerland
- Professor Annalisa Savaresi, Centre for Climate Change, Energy and Environmental Law at the University of East Finland; University of Stirling, Scotland
104 에피소드
Manage episode 452253695 series 1577323
International Bar Association (IBA) and IBA Global Insight에서 제공하는 콘텐츠입니다. 에피소드, 그래픽, 팟캐스트 설명을 포함한 모든 팟캐스트 콘텐츠는 International Bar Association (IBA) and IBA Global Insight 또는 해당 팟캐스트 플랫폼 파트너가 직접 업로드하고 제공합니다. 누군가가 귀하의 허락 없이 귀하의 저작물을 사용하고 있다고 생각되는 경우 여기에 설명된 절차를 따르실 수 있습니다 https://ko.player.fm/legal.
In April 2024, a group of older Swiss women successfully argued before the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) that the Swiss government was failing to take sufficient action on climate change, violating their human rights as a disproportionately affected group under the European Convention on Human Rights. However, the Swiss parliament rejected the judgment in Klimaseniorinnen v Switzerland, claiming the ECtHR had overstepped its legal boundaries and engaged in ‘inappropriate judicial activism’, a stance later supported by the Swiss Federal Council, the country’s highest executive authority.
Switzerland has since presented a National Action Report on climate instead, which critics argue will not adequately implement the Court’s judgment.
This podcast explores the impact and fallout of the case.
With:
Switzerland has since presented a National Action Report on climate instead, which critics argue will not adequately implement the Court’s judgment.
This podcast explores the impact and fallout of the case.
With:
- Richard Harvey, Legal Counsel at Greenpeace UK
- Elizabeth Stern, claimant in KlimaSeniorinnen v Switzerland
- Professor Annalisa Savaresi, Centre for Climate Change, Energy and Environmental Law at the University of East Finland; University of Stirling, Scotland
104 에피소드
Tutti gli episodi
×플레이어 FM에 오신것을 환영합니다!
플레이어 FM은 웹에서 고품질 팟캐스트를 검색하여 지금 바로 즐길 수 있도록 합니다. 최고의 팟캐스트 앱이며 Android, iPhone 및 웹에서도 작동합니다. 장치 간 구독 동기화를 위해 가입하세요.