Artwork

Jim Eltringham에서 제공하는 콘텐츠입니다. 에피소드, 그래픽, 팟캐스트 설명을 포함한 모든 팟캐스트 콘텐츠는 Jim Eltringham 또는 해당 팟캐스트 플랫폼 파트너가 직접 업로드하고 제공합니다. 누군가가 귀하의 허락 없이 귀하의 저작물을 사용하고 있다고 생각되는 경우 여기에 설명된 절차를 따르실 수 있습니다 https://ko.player.fm/legal.
Player FM -팟 캐스트 앱
Player FM 앱으로 오프라인으로 전환하세요!

Episode 26: Chilling Free Speech on Climate Change with Steve Everley

 
공유
 

Manage episode 152988203 series 1077945
Jim Eltringham에서 제공하는 콘텐츠입니다. 에피소드, 그래픽, 팟캐스트 설명을 포함한 모든 팟캐스트 콘텐츠는 Jim Eltringham 또는 해당 팟캐스트 플랫폼 파트너가 직접 업로드하고 제공합니다. 누군가가 귀하의 허락 없이 귀하의 저작물을 사용하고 있다고 생각되는 경우 여기에 설명된 절차를 따르실 수 있습니다 https://ko.player.fm/legal.

The Attorney General of the U.S. Virgin Islands is targeting 90 groups because they are skeptical of claims made by environmental groups. Claude Walker’s office wants to know what Exxon Mobil talked about with the likes of the Competitive Enterprise Institute, the Heritage Foundation, the Cato Institute, and others.

Regardless of your position in the scientific debates, that’s a little scary. Climate science is a nuanced field that forces you to appreciate the intricacies of various factors within the planet’s atmosphere that create long-term patterns. Because of that, rationally, you can appreciate why there are wide ranges of perspectives on climate change. It makes sense that there would be a debate about what’s happening, why it’s happening, and what can be reasonably done to counterract it.

Some groups don’t like that, and want to take the climate change debate out of the scientific world and drop it in the political realm. Steve Everley, a senior advisor with Energy in Depth, talks about the free speech implications of investigations into “climate deniers” (and the interests that are driving the conversation) on this Crummy Little Podcast.

(In the interest of full disclosure, I’ve done extensive advocacy work for oil and energy companies over the years. We don’t really talk about it, but it seemed worth bringing up.)

Listen/download it here or subscribe on iTunes.

Click to play

Extras:

  continue reading

10 에피소드

Artwork
icon공유
 
Manage episode 152988203 series 1077945
Jim Eltringham에서 제공하는 콘텐츠입니다. 에피소드, 그래픽, 팟캐스트 설명을 포함한 모든 팟캐스트 콘텐츠는 Jim Eltringham 또는 해당 팟캐스트 플랫폼 파트너가 직접 업로드하고 제공합니다. 누군가가 귀하의 허락 없이 귀하의 저작물을 사용하고 있다고 생각되는 경우 여기에 설명된 절차를 따르실 수 있습니다 https://ko.player.fm/legal.

The Attorney General of the U.S. Virgin Islands is targeting 90 groups because they are skeptical of claims made by environmental groups. Claude Walker’s office wants to know what Exxon Mobil talked about with the likes of the Competitive Enterprise Institute, the Heritage Foundation, the Cato Institute, and others.

Regardless of your position in the scientific debates, that’s a little scary. Climate science is a nuanced field that forces you to appreciate the intricacies of various factors within the planet’s atmosphere that create long-term patterns. Because of that, rationally, you can appreciate why there are wide ranges of perspectives on climate change. It makes sense that there would be a debate about what’s happening, why it’s happening, and what can be reasonably done to counterract it.

Some groups don’t like that, and want to take the climate change debate out of the scientific world and drop it in the political realm. Steve Everley, a senior advisor with Energy in Depth, talks about the free speech implications of investigations into “climate deniers” (and the interests that are driving the conversation) on this Crummy Little Podcast.

(In the interest of full disclosure, I’ve done extensive advocacy work for oil and energy companies over the years. We don’t really talk about it, but it seemed worth bringing up.)

Listen/download it here or subscribe on iTunes.

Click to play

Extras:

  continue reading

10 에피소드

모든 에피소드

×
 
Loading …

플레이어 FM에 오신것을 환영합니다!

플레이어 FM은 웹에서 고품질 팟캐스트를 검색하여 지금 바로 즐길 수 있도록 합니다. 최고의 팟캐스트 앱이며 Android, iPhone 및 웹에서도 작동합니다. 장치 간 구독 동기화를 위해 가입하세요.

 

빠른 참조 가이드