Artwork

NZME and Newstalk ZB에서 제공하는 콘텐츠입니다. 에피소드, 그래픽, 팟캐스트 설명을 포함한 모든 팟캐스트 콘텐츠는 NZME and Newstalk ZB 또는 해당 팟캐스트 플랫폼 파트너가 직접 업로드하고 제공합니다. 누군가가 귀하의 허락 없이 귀하의 저작물을 사용하고 있다고 생각되는 경우 여기에 설명된 절차를 따르실 수 있습니다 https://ko.player.fm/legal.
Player FM -팟 캐스트 앱
Player FM 앱으로 오프라인으로 전환하세요!

John MacDonald: Fix the Clean Slate law or get rid of it?

4:15
 
공유
 

Manage episode 501672443 series 3032727
NZME and Newstalk ZB에서 제공하는 콘텐츠입니다. 에피소드, 그래픽, 팟캐스트 설명을 포함한 모든 팟캐스트 콘텐츠는 NZME and Newstalk ZB 또는 해당 팟캐스트 플랫폼 파트너가 직접 업로드하고 제공합니다. 누군가가 귀하의 허락 없이 귀하의 저작물을 사용하고 있다고 생각되는 경우 여기에 설명된 절차를 따르실 수 있습니다 https://ko.player.fm/legal.

How do you feel about people being allowed to hide their convictions?

There are two ways of doing it. 1) Just don’t tell people about it. Or use the clean slate legislation, which wipes your record clean if you’ve had no convictions for seven years.

If you’ve been to prison for your offences though, you don’t qualify.

Concerns about the legislation are being raised after an Auckland man with historical indecency convictions was able to pass multiple police checks, become registered as a teacher, and abuse nine girls.

Which has law expert Bill Hodge saying that the law needs an overhaul.

But I think we would be better off getting rid of it. Because the bigger picture here is whether we think someone should be able to hide their convictions after a certain period of time so they can get on with their life without it hanging over them.

I think there should be complete transparency, and here’s why:

If you’re an employer, under our health and safety laws, you are responsible for the safety of anyone and everyone working for you. To do that, you need to be confident that you are bringing people into your business or your organisation who are of, what they call, “good character”.

How can you do that if there are things about someone you don’t know? Things like past criminal convictions?

Remembering too that the convictions we’re talking about here aren’t things like murder. But let’s say, for example, someone was a menace on the roads when they were younger and had numerous convictions because of that.

Seven years down the track, would you want to know about that if you were looking at giving them a job? I would.

What about someone who had convictions for violence that weren’t quite serious enough for them to end up in prison? Someone who had a history of going out on a Saturday night and getting lippy in the pub?

Seven years down the track, would you want to know about that if you were looking at giving them a job? I would.

Dishonesty convictions? You’d want to know about those too, wouldn’t you?

Imagine how better that would be for the person with the convictions, as well? Everything would be out in the open, there’d be no fear of people finding out through word-of-mouth and the problems that would create.

I’m all for giving people a second chance, but only if all of the cards are on the table.

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

  continue reading

1091 에피소드

Artwork
icon공유
 
Manage episode 501672443 series 3032727
NZME and Newstalk ZB에서 제공하는 콘텐츠입니다. 에피소드, 그래픽, 팟캐스트 설명을 포함한 모든 팟캐스트 콘텐츠는 NZME and Newstalk ZB 또는 해당 팟캐스트 플랫폼 파트너가 직접 업로드하고 제공합니다. 누군가가 귀하의 허락 없이 귀하의 저작물을 사용하고 있다고 생각되는 경우 여기에 설명된 절차를 따르실 수 있습니다 https://ko.player.fm/legal.

How do you feel about people being allowed to hide their convictions?

There are two ways of doing it. 1) Just don’t tell people about it. Or use the clean slate legislation, which wipes your record clean if you’ve had no convictions for seven years.

If you’ve been to prison for your offences though, you don’t qualify.

Concerns about the legislation are being raised after an Auckland man with historical indecency convictions was able to pass multiple police checks, become registered as a teacher, and abuse nine girls.

Which has law expert Bill Hodge saying that the law needs an overhaul.

But I think we would be better off getting rid of it. Because the bigger picture here is whether we think someone should be able to hide their convictions after a certain period of time so they can get on with their life without it hanging over them.

I think there should be complete transparency, and here’s why:

If you’re an employer, under our health and safety laws, you are responsible for the safety of anyone and everyone working for you. To do that, you need to be confident that you are bringing people into your business or your organisation who are of, what they call, “good character”.

How can you do that if there are things about someone you don’t know? Things like past criminal convictions?

Remembering too that the convictions we’re talking about here aren’t things like murder. But let’s say, for example, someone was a menace on the roads when they were younger and had numerous convictions because of that.

Seven years down the track, would you want to know about that if you were looking at giving them a job? I would.

What about someone who had convictions for violence that weren’t quite serious enough for them to end up in prison? Someone who had a history of going out on a Saturday night and getting lippy in the pub?

Seven years down the track, would you want to know about that if you were looking at giving them a job? I would.

Dishonesty convictions? You’d want to know about those too, wouldn’t you?

Imagine how better that would be for the person with the convictions, as well? Everything would be out in the open, there’d be no fear of people finding out through word-of-mouth and the problems that would create.

I’m all for giving people a second chance, but only if all of the cards are on the table.

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

  continue reading

1091 에피소드

모든 에피소드

×
 
Loading …

플레이어 FM에 오신것을 환영합니다!

플레이어 FM은 웹에서 고품질 팟캐스트를 검색하여 지금 바로 즐길 수 있도록 합니다. 최고의 팟캐스트 앱이며 Android, iPhone 및 웹에서도 작동합니다. 장치 간 구독 동기화를 위해 가입하세요.

 

빠른 참조 가이드

탐색하는 동안 이 프로그램을 들어보세요.
재생