Artwork

NZME and Newstalk ZB에서 제공하는 콘텐츠입니다. 에피소드, 그래픽, 팟캐스트 설명을 포함한 모든 팟캐스트 콘텐츠는 NZME and Newstalk ZB 또는 해당 팟캐스트 플랫폼 파트너가 직접 업로드하고 제공합니다. 누군가가 귀하의 허락 없이 귀하의 저작물을 사용하고 있다고 생각되는 경우 여기에 설명된 절차를 따르실 수 있습니다 https://ko.player.fm/legal.
Player FM -팟 캐스트 앱
Player FM 앱으로 오프라인으로 전환하세요!

John MacDonald: Are councils really the best outfits to be in charge of the water?

4:31
 
공유
 

Manage episode 501135813 series 3032727
NZME and Newstalk ZB에서 제공하는 콘텐츠입니다. 에피소드, 그래픽, 팟캐스트 설명을 포함한 모든 팟캐스트 콘텐츠는 NZME and Newstalk ZB 또는 해당 팟캐스트 플랫폼 파트너가 직접 업로드하고 제공합니다. 누군가가 귀하의 허락 없이 귀하의 저작물을 사용하고 있다고 생각되는 경우 여기에 설명된 절차를 따르실 수 있습니다 https://ko.player.fm/legal.

We are going to pay more for water services. But even though it's coming about because of government policy, I’m not blaming Wellington. I’m blaming our councils.

Councils that should be ashamed of how they ran down our water infrastructure to the extent that millions of litres of water disappear every day because of cruddy pipes.

And the consequence of that neglect and incompetence is going to hit us in the pocket.

Two examples. In Christchurch, household water bills are expected to increase by $900 a year. In Selwyn, the yearly increase in water charges could be as high as $1800 a year.

Local Government Minister Simon Watts is saying the Government’s Local Water Done Well policy, which is the alternative to Labour’s doomed 3 Waters policy, is "the best approach” to sorting out our water infrastructure.

But I wonder if you’re starting to realise that Labour’s approach wasn’t so bad after all?

Under that model, control of drinking water, wastewater, and stormwater would have been taken away from local councils and handed over to new water authorities.

It would’ve taken away ownership of water infrastructure, too.

I’m more than happy to put my hand up and say, at the time, it was the ownership bit that got me going.

Back then, I thought the then-Labour Government was offering peanuts to take over ownership of water infrastructure.

But I am more than happy to put my hand up now and say that wasn’t the big deal I once thought it was, and I think we would have all been better off under Labour’s model. Because not only are we going to be paying more for our water, but there are also going to be a truckload more water entities than there would have been.

Under 3 Waters, there would have been 10 entities. Now, it’s already looking like we’ll have more than 40 water service providers involving different councils.

So more bureaucracy and more costs, all in the name of local ownership and control.

All in the name of local ownership and control by local councils which, because of their neglect of the water infrastructure year-after-year, are going to be hitting us with big increases in water charges. Local councils who have failed us.

If councils had done what they should have done and not kicked the infrastructure spending can down the road time and time again, then maybe we wouldn’t be feeling so fleeced.

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

  continue reading

1091 에피소드

Artwork
icon공유
 
Manage episode 501135813 series 3032727
NZME and Newstalk ZB에서 제공하는 콘텐츠입니다. 에피소드, 그래픽, 팟캐스트 설명을 포함한 모든 팟캐스트 콘텐츠는 NZME and Newstalk ZB 또는 해당 팟캐스트 플랫폼 파트너가 직접 업로드하고 제공합니다. 누군가가 귀하의 허락 없이 귀하의 저작물을 사용하고 있다고 생각되는 경우 여기에 설명된 절차를 따르실 수 있습니다 https://ko.player.fm/legal.

We are going to pay more for water services. But even though it's coming about because of government policy, I’m not blaming Wellington. I’m blaming our councils.

Councils that should be ashamed of how they ran down our water infrastructure to the extent that millions of litres of water disappear every day because of cruddy pipes.

And the consequence of that neglect and incompetence is going to hit us in the pocket.

Two examples. In Christchurch, household water bills are expected to increase by $900 a year. In Selwyn, the yearly increase in water charges could be as high as $1800 a year.

Local Government Minister Simon Watts is saying the Government’s Local Water Done Well policy, which is the alternative to Labour’s doomed 3 Waters policy, is "the best approach” to sorting out our water infrastructure.

But I wonder if you’re starting to realise that Labour’s approach wasn’t so bad after all?

Under that model, control of drinking water, wastewater, and stormwater would have been taken away from local councils and handed over to new water authorities.

It would’ve taken away ownership of water infrastructure, too.

I’m more than happy to put my hand up and say, at the time, it was the ownership bit that got me going.

Back then, I thought the then-Labour Government was offering peanuts to take over ownership of water infrastructure.

But I am more than happy to put my hand up now and say that wasn’t the big deal I once thought it was, and I think we would have all been better off under Labour’s model. Because not only are we going to be paying more for our water, but there are also going to be a truckload more water entities than there would have been.

Under 3 Waters, there would have been 10 entities. Now, it’s already looking like we’ll have more than 40 water service providers involving different councils.

So more bureaucracy and more costs, all in the name of local ownership and control.

All in the name of local ownership and control by local councils which, because of their neglect of the water infrastructure year-after-year, are going to be hitting us with big increases in water charges. Local councils who have failed us.

If councils had done what they should have done and not kicked the infrastructure spending can down the road time and time again, then maybe we wouldn’t be feeling so fleeced.

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

  continue reading

1091 에피소드

모든 에피소드

×
 
Loading …

플레이어 FM에 오신것을 환영합니다!

플레이어 FM은 웹에서 고품질 팟캐스트를 검색하여 지금 바로 즐길 수 있도록 합니다. 최고의 팟캐스트 앱이며 Android, iPhone 및 웹에서도 작동합니다. 장치 간 구독 동기화를 위해 가입하세요.

 

빠른 참조 가이드

탐색하는 동안 이 프로그램을 들어보세요.
재생