The Inescapability of Group Dynamic and Form - Blood $atellite

Blood $atellite Clips on Odysee

After discussing Chud Kant in a Gooner’s Aristocracy and Wrath of Gnon’s analysis of “The Human Scale” as an ideal measure of scale in human communities, Dimes and Judas build into the fascinating book “Experiences in Groups” by Wilfred Bion. There they explore the psychoanalytic approach of identifying group behaviors as a holistic organism, how everyone lives within the context of groups that form inevitably, and the difference between a basic assumption group and a work group.
Taken from Episode #240 – Chuck Formerly Starts Blinking Linkin Park [“huffing flux vapor”]
Listen to full episodes of Blood $atellite on, iTunes, Google Podcasts, Stitcher, Audible, and more.
➡️ Full Content: http://www.bloodsatellite.ca
➡️ Clips: https://odysee.com/@BloodSatellite:3
➡️ Support: https://bloodsatellite.gumroad.com/
★ Store: https://goodsvffer.com/
★ Vanguardist Journal: https://vanguardistjournal.com/
★ Twitter: https://twitter.com/LegallyIronic
Timestamps:
0:00 – Chud Kant and Aristocratic Goonering
08:33 – Generational Categorization as a Media for Fragmenting Identity in Utility Time
17:51 – Utilizing “The Human Scale” for Group Organization
28:12 – “Experiences in Groups” Discussion Begins
32:13 – The Inescapable Negotiation Between Individual and Group
35:23 – Basic Assumption Groups vs. Work Groups
38:36 – The Functional Definition of a Group
43:32 – The Group as a Pool of Desires as Complicity
47:19 – The Proto-Mental Matrix
50:12 – Leaders in Dependent Groups and the Genius/Madman Oscillation
54:58 – The Long-Term Superiority of the Work Group vs. Basic Assumptions