Player FM 앱으로 오프라인으로 전환하세요!
Andrew Dickens: City and rural need to unite, not divide over issues
저장한 시리즈 ("피드 비활성화" status)
When? This feed was archived on March 29, 2025 20:09 (). Last successful fetch was on November 28, 2024 14:53 ()
Why? 피드 비활성화 status. 잠시 서버에 문제가 발생해 팟캐스트를 불러오지 못합니다.
What now? You might be able to find a more up-to-date version using the search function. This series will no longer be checked for updates. If you believe this to be in error, please check if the publisher's feed link below is valid and contact support to request the feed be restored or if you have any other concerns about this.
Manage episode 297789360 series 2098448
As I drove in this morning, I heard a farmer on ZB claiming that city folk have no idea of the environmental regulation and the cost of compliance that the farming community have to bear.
I thought that was a bit unfair. Currently Auckland Council is spending $1 billion dollars on the interceptor project which is to prevent wastewater from entering the watercourses that crisis across the city. That’s part of the costs of keeping rates high.
Then there’s the story of the service station that’s being developed in my suburb. This is a saga that has rumbled on for years. The service station operator has now spent more than $500,000 on getting resource consents and will spend just about as much on environmental safeguards.
City businesses will complain about compliance costs as much as any farmer.
Meanwhile, I’m struck by the similarity between the issues of S.N.As and heritage protection.
S.N.As are Significant Natural Areas on farming land that the authorities now want to register and protect.
Farmers see this as a land grab. It’s their land and they’ll do what they want with it. If farmers bought a block with a wetland in it they may have already factored in the draining of that land as part of the business plan. To have a council come along and say hands off would go down like cold sick.
Of course, some farmers do it voluntarily with over 4700 covenants on Significant Natural Area already in place. And that’s the choice thing rather than the compulsion.
In cities, there’s a similar but opposite argument.
New zoning is threatening heritage properties that could be redeveloped into higher density housing.
Battlelines are being formed particularly in older city suburbs to protect owners from councils imposing zoning laws on their land and neighbourhoods. It’s a personal property right issue just like S.N.As are for farmers.
It would be nice to see that as New Zealanders, whether in the country or the city there is more that unites us than divides us.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
656 에피소드
저장한 시리즈 ("피드 비활성화" status)
When? This feed was archived on March 29, 2025 20:09 (). Last successful fetch was on November 28, 2024 14:53 ()
Why? 피드 비활성화 status. 잠시 서버에 문제가 발생해 팟캐스트를 불러오지 못합니다.
What now? You might be able to find a more up-to-date version using the search function. This series will no longer be checked for updates. If you believe this to be in error, please check if the publisher's feed link below is valid and contact support to request the feed be restored or if you have any other concerns about this.
Manage episode 297789360 series 2098448
As I drove in this morning, I heard a farmer on ZB claiming that city folk have no idea of the environmental regulation and the cost of compliance that the farming community have to bear.
I thought that was a bit unfair. Currently Auckland Council is spending $1 billion dollars on the interceptor project which is to prevent wastewater from entering the watercourses that crisis across the city. That’s part of the costs of keeping rates high.
Then there’s the story of the service station that’s being developed in my suburb. This is a saga that has rumbled on for years. The service station operator has now spent more than $500,000 on getting resource consents and will spend just about as much on environmental safeguards.
City businesses will complain about compliance costs as much as any farmer.
Meanwhile, I’m struck by the similarity between the issues of S.N.As and heritage protection.
S.N.As are Significant Natural Areas on farming land that the authorities now want to register and protect.
Farmers see this as a land grab. It’s their land and they’ll do what they want with it. If farmers bought a block with a wetland in it they may have already factored in the draining of that land as part of the business plan. To have a council come along and say hands off would go down like cold sick.
Of course, some farmers do it voluntarily with over 4700 covenants on Significant Natural Area already in place. And that’s the choice thing rather than the compulsion.
In cities, there’s a similar but opposite argument.
New zoning is threatening heritage properties that could be redeveloped into higher density housing.
Battlelines are being formed particularly in older city suburbs to protect owners from councils imposing zoning laws on their land and neighbourhoods. It’s a personal property right issue just like S.N.As are for farmers.
It would be nice to see that as New Zealanders, whether in the country or the city there is more that unites us than divides us.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
656 에피소드
모든 에피소드
×플레이어 FM에 오신것을 환영합니다!
플레이어 FM은 웹에서 고품질 팟캐스트를 검색하여 지금 바로 즐길 수 있도록 합니다. 최고의 팟캐스트 앱이며 Android, iPhone 및 웹에서도 작동합니다. 장치 간 구독 동기화를 위해 가입하세요.