An Agile Product Backlog Is NOT a List of Requirements with Adam Ulery

Agile Coaches' Corner

AgileThought and Dan Neumann at AgileThought에서 제공하는 콘텐츠입니다. 에피소드, 그래픽, 팟캐스트 설명을 포함한 모든 팟캐스트 콘텐츠는 AgileThought and Dan Neumann at AgileThought 또는 해당 팟캐스트 플랫폼 파트너가 직접 업로드하고 제공합니다. 누군가가 귀하의 허락 없이 귀하의 저작물을 사용하고 있다고 생각되는 경우 여기에 설명된 절차를 따르실 수 있습니다 https://ko.player.fm/legal.

2+ y ago 33:20

MP3•에피소드 홈

저장한 시리즈 ("피드 비활성화" status)

When? This feed was archived on September 27, 2025 20:13 (19d ago). Last successful fetch was on November 28, 2024 15:27 (11M ago)

Why? 피드 비활성화 status. 잠시 서버에 문제가 발생해 팟캐스트를 불러오지 못합니다.

What now? You might be able to find a more up-to-date version using the search function. This series will no longer be checked for updates. If you believe this to be in error, please check if the publisher's feed link below is valid and contact support to request the feed be restored or if you have any other concerns about this.

This week, Dan Neumann is joined by his colleague and friend, Adam Ulery, to talk about product backlogs.

In this episode, Dan and Adam explore the recent patterns showing interesting ways of using Agile terms, as it is an example nowadays that people call product backlogs the source of requirements for the Team, they discuss today the challenges that may arise as a result of this misinterpretation.

Key Takeaways

What are product backlogs? And why they are not just the source of requirements.
- A product backlog is a list of all the things that will be needed for product development.
- If you consider product backlogs the source of requirements, then the only action that can be taken is to deliver them, not leaving any room for creativity or flexibility. No new alternatives seem to be welcomed if “the requirements” are already set.
- The product backlog often grows when items are added (this is one main distinction from a list of requirements).
Where’s the commitment point?
- Adam advises differing that commitment point as far into the future as possible so the Team can make the best decision that they can.
Don’t forget the learning component.
- We are building to learn, always trying to learn and to use that knowledge to inform what we do next.
- We always update our plans based on what we are learning.
Do Teams have to have a hierarchical structure with epic and features?
- Adam explains how this became a trend over time.
- There is a need to organize the work to show to the client, but when encountering unexpected work that needs to be done, it does not need to appear in the user story format since it is simply not valuable.

Mentioned in this Episode:

The Art of Prayer, Kenneth E. Hagin

Want to Learn More or Get in Touch?

Visit the website and catch up with all the episodes on AgileThought.com!

Email your thoughts or suggestions to [email protected] or Tweet @AgileThought using #AgileThoughtPodcast!

332 에피소드

#Agile #Software Development #Business #AgileThought #Dan Neumann at AgileThought #Agile Coach #Tech