United States 공개
[search 0]
Download the App!
show episodes
 
United States of Murder is a true-crime podcast that discusses a range of lesser-known crimes, unsolved cases, serial killers, and more throughout America. There is a little banter, but we try to keep it minimal. Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/unitedstatesofmurder/support
  continue reading
 
The Government Explained Podcast provides timely, objective analysis and presents clear, non-partisan information for everyone. Each episode focuses on a single topic to ensure a thorough and straightforward discussion. The goal of this podcast is to take complex government-related topics and make them easy for anyone to understand.
  continue reading
 
This podcast is devoted to exploring presidential history from the founding of the office in 1789 on through the present day. I plan to take a systematic approach to both the people and the events that have shaped and reshaped each administration and the office in general.
  continue reading
 
Artwork

1
United States of PTSD

Matthew Boucher & Cora Lee Kennedy

Unsubscribe
Unsubscribe
매달+
 
Season One: Mental health concerns are on the rise in the United States. This podcast will look at the influencing factors contributing to the decline of our culture. With the rise of school shootings, political divisiveness, increasing levels of hate, and a chronic war of peoples' rights, we have entered a domestic war that never ends. Our podcast will look at whether this is done by design or is it an abject failure. We will discuss it from a clinical and common-sense perspective. Secondar ...
  continue reading
 
A supplemental podcast for the website USvTsarnaev.org, dedicated to discussing the Boston Marathon bombing and the court case United States v. Dzhokhar Tsarnaev. Frequent topics are developments in Dzhokhar's appeal, new findings on our independent investigation into the case, legal opinions from an in-house defense attorney, and more.
  continue reading
 
Welcome to the dark lord Reapers United States of Anarchy podcast where where no topic is off-limits and we give the Unapologetic truth you will also be discussing up-and-coming artist local artists local up-and-coming Brands and businesses that deserve your patronage and the attention of the mainstream Society race religion and politics will also be discussed if you are easily offended or have a narrow-minded point of view please do not listen!! And while you’re at it boycott my social medi ...
  continue reading
 
What happens when college public radio becomes unhinged? Join Professor Gordon Pringle of La Brea Community College ("Where The Tar Meets The Sidewalk"), for These United States Stories, as he interviews a man who lives in a whale, a consumer advocate for watchers of online porn, the proprietor of a family billy club business and other craftsmen, crackpots and characters from around the country. A new interview each week, painting a picture of the USA, one disturbing story at a time.
  continue reading
 
There is a special bond between animals and people. The United States of Animals explores that bond through stories and interviews from throughout the world. Some will make you laugh, some might make you cry - but through them all you will discover why in the USA all people and animals are created equal.
  continue reading
 
Let's explore the rarely discussed women who helped shape America and the world through science, education, writing, public service, and so much more. Join Elizabeth and Jessica as they shine a spotlight on those women often forgotten in history class.
  continue reading
 
Immigration Consultant Mitchell Saum discusses Employment-Based visas, green cards, and general immigration to the United States. **Disclaimer: This content does not constitute legal advice and does not establish an attorney-client relationship. I am not an immigration attorney and if you are seeking legal advice, please contact a licensed immigration attorney.
  continue reading
 
Poignant and candid stories that explore what it means to experience race in America - from our earliest childhood memories to our current day social and political beliefs. Some heartbreaking, some cringe-worthy, some uplifting – all very personal. By sharing the stories of when we first learned we are all different, we find the common thread that shows us how much we’re all the same. Follow #unitedstatesofrace for more content at instagram.com/unitedstatesofrace and medium.com/united-states ...
  continue reading
 
Throughout the years the Supreme Court has evolved much like the rest of the federal government. This would not be without landmark rulings, which will be the main focus of this podcast. Landmark rulings lay the groundwork for laws to be overturned or upheld and allow for the United States to work toward major goals. Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/aaron-larson2/support
  continue reading
 
A podcast for fandom by fandom desperately trying to stay on topic. Join us for weekly discussions about pop culture and whatever else makes us mad. Also follow this feed for weekly discussions of the Harry Potter books chapter by chapter. Subscribe to us on Soundcloud, iTunes, Stitcher, TuneIn, and all other major podcasting services!
  continue reading
 
Want to know what strategies real graduates used to launch their career? Itching to know what top companies really look for in an applicant? Well here's your chance! From personal stories to insider tips, our interviews with graduates and campus recruiters will equip you with the knowledge and inspiration you need to take off and stand out from the crowd. Join us as we soar to success in the big bad world of working life! Brought to you by Prosple, your one-stop-shop for finding and securing ...
  continue reading
 
Artwork

1
The United States of Air: a Satire

J.M. Porup on Podiobooks.com

Unsubscribe
Unsubscribe
매달
 
The National Sewer Agency is spying on people's toilets, looking for food terrorists... Food Enforcement Agent Jason Frolick believes in America. He believes in eating air. He struggles to get the food monkey off his back. As part of the Global War on Fat, his job is to put food terrorists in Fat Camp. When a pizza dealer gets whacked in the park across the street from the Thin House, the Prophet Jones himself asks Frolick to investigate. For the first time ever, Frolick solves a murder--but ...
  continue reading
 
Loading …
show series
 
This week, we’re in Texas discussing a murder by a jealous ex. Then, we’ll talk about a missing veteran in Houston. Buckle up and join us on this dark and twisted ride through the Lone Star State. If you have any information on Jared Chavis's whereabouts, please call the Houston Police Department at 832-394-1840. You may now join us on⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠…
  continue reading
 
Tenure of Office: March 4, 1813 - November 23, 1814 Despite being elected to the First Congress under the Constitution, Elbridge Gerry would hit some rocky patches in his career of public service after 1789. Still, the twists and turns that led him on a diplomatic mission to France, a couple of terms as governor of Massachusetts, and finally to pre…
  continue reading
 
This episode examines the Biden administration's revised proclamation and final rule on border security, implemented in October 2024. The rule aims to address record-high migrant encounters at the Southwest border by restricting asylum eligibility and modifying the criteria for lifting the entry suspension. Key changes include increasing the requir…
  continue reading
 
The British, realizing that things are not going their way, decide to make the American's an offer to end the war. Join us on social media! Threads: https://www.threads.net/@uspoliticalpodcast Twitter: https://twitter.com/ushistpodcast Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/USPoliticalpodcast/ Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/uspoliticalpodcast/ We…
  continue reading
 
Send us a text Facing the harsh reality of feeling invisible in the healthcare system can be overwhelming, especially when battling chronic conditions. Donna returns to share her courageous journey through the maze of medical gaslighting, where her invisible illnesses were often dismissed. We unravel the staggering fact that obtaining a proper diag…
  continue reading
 
The case NVIDIA v. Öhman, concerning the sufficiency of pleadings under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act (PSLRA). The core dispute centers on the level of detail required in complaints alleging corporate fraud, specifically regarding the use of expert reports and the necessity of disclosing the contents of internal documents. The justic…
  continue reading
 
QUESTION PRESENTED: (1) Whether plaintiffs seeking to allege scienter under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act based on allegations about internal company documents must plead with particularity the contents of those documents; and (2) whether plaintiffs can satisfy the Act's falsity requirement by relying on an expert opinion to substitu…
  continue reading
 
Discover Luke Andrews’ inspiring real estate journey as he navigates the highs and lows of building a successful portfolio, from bold goals to hard-won lessons. (00:03) - Introduction to the Real Estate Investing Success Show(00:15) - Meet Luke Andrews: Real Estate Leader and Investor(00:30) - Family Life and Balancing Real Estate Ventures(00:45) -…
  continue reading
 
This week Ashley discusses a mass rape trial in France. Then, Lacey talks about a bizarre doctor in Arkansas who has made headlines for his nudist practice. Ashley ends with a sad tale about a man's search for his wife years after his wife's disappearance. We also lighten the mood by discussing what we're listening to and watching. Did something wa…
  continue reading
 
This week, we’re in South Carolina discussing a police chief turned robber. Then, we’ll talk about a ride-sharemurder. Buckle up and join us on this dark and twisted ride through the Palmetto State. You may now join us on⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Patreon⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠…
  continue reading
 
We will be explaining the Constitutional-Doubt Canon, a Supreme Court doctrine that prioritizes interpreting statutes to avoid constitutional conflicts. The Canon encourages courts to find constitutionally sound interpretations even if not the most obvious reading of the law. This approach allows for Congressional amendment if the Court's interpret…
  continue reading
 
We will be explainingg the Supreme Court's Constitutional Avoidance Doctrine, specifically focusing on the "Last Resort Rule." This rule dictates that courts should resolve cases on non-constitutional grounds if possible, avoiding unnecessary constitutional precedents and allowing the political process to address contentious issues.…
  continue reading
 
The case Salvatore Delligatti v. United States. The case centers on the interpretation of the "Elements Clause" within the Armed Career Criminal Act, specifically whether the clause applies to crimes of omission (failing to act) as well as acts of commission. The petitioner argues that the clause only covers affirmative actions involving violent ph…
  continue reading
 
The Supreme Court case Velazquez v. Garland. The central issue is the interpretation of a 60-day deadline for voluntary departure in immigration law, specifically whether this deadline should be extended if it falls on a weekend or holiday. The petitioner argues for an extension based on established legal principles and regulations, while the respo…
  continue reading
 
The case Facebook v. Amalgamated Bank. The case centers on whether risk disclosures in financial statements are misleading by omission if they don't mention past occurrences of the described risk. The petitioners argue that such omissions are only misleading if they create an implied representation about the past, while the respondents contend that…
  continue reading
 
The case E.M.D. Sales, Inc., et al. v. Faustino Sanchez Carrera, et al. The central issue concerns the appropriate standard of proof—preponderance of the evidence versus clear and convincing evidence—for determining whether employees fall under an exemption from the Fair Labor Standards Act's overtime requirements. The Petitioners argue for the def…
  continue reading
 
The case Advocate Christ Medical Center v. Becerra. The case concerns the interpretation of the phrase "entitled to benefits" within the Disproportionate Share Hospital (DSH) adjustment formula, specifically regarding Supplemental Security Income (SSI) benefits. The petitioners argue that "entitled to benefits" should refer to program eligibility, …
  continue reading
 
This Supreme Court oral argument concerns the application of the False Claims Act (FCA) to the E-rate program, which funds telecommunications services for schools and libraries. The petitioner argues the FCA doesn't apply because the government doesn't directly provide the funds, instead using a private administrator and requiring private carriers …
  continue reading
 
Tenure of Office: March 4, 1813 - November 23, 1814 Signer of the Declaration of Independence and the Articles of Confederation, Elbridge Gerry of Massachusetts quickly rose to become one of the key leaders in Congress during the American Revolution and the war's aftermath. However, as Alex and I explore in this episode, when it came time for the C…
  continue reading
 
We will be explaining the Constitutional Avoidance Doctrine, a set of Supreme Court rules minimizing conflict between the judiciary and the legislature. A key component is judicial minimalism, which advocates for narrow rulings based solely on the case's facts, avoiding broad precedents and politically charged constitutional questions.…
  continue reading
 
This is part 9 about eight common interpretive approaches, including textualism, original meaning, and historical practices. A subsequent report focuses specifically on the use of historical practices, highlighting both its proponents and critics. We examines textualism, contrasting its strict application with more flexible interpretations, and sho…
  continue reading
 
This is part 8 about eight common interpretive approaches, including textualism, original meaning, and historical practices. A subsequent report focuses specifically on the use of historical practices, highlighting both its proponents and critics. Weexamines textualism, contrasting its strict application with more flexible interpretations, and show…
  continue reading
 
This is part 7 about eight common interpretive approaches, including textualism, original meaning, and historical practices. A subsequent report focuses specifically on the use of historical practices, highlighting both its proponents and critics. We examines textualism, contrasting its strict application with more flexible interpretations, and sho…
  continue reading
 
This is part 6 about eight common interpretive approaches, including textualism, original meaning, and historical practices. A subsequent report focuses specifically on the use of historical practices, highlighting both its proponents and critics. We examines textualism, contrasting its strict application with more flexible interpretations, and sho…
  continue reading
 
This is part 5 about eight common interpretive approaches, including textualism, original meaning, and historical practices. A subsequent report focuses specifically on the use of historical practices, highlighting both its proponents and critics. We examines textualism, contrasting its strict application with more flexible interpretations, and sho…
  continue reading
 
This is part 4 about eight common interpretive approaches, including textualism, original meaning, and historical practices. A subsequent report focuses specifically on the use of historical practices, highlighting both its proponents and critics. We examines textualism, contrasting its strict application with more flexible interpretations, and sho…
  continue reading
 
This is part 3 about eight common interpretive approaches, including textualism, original meaning, and historical practices. A subsequent report focuses specifically on the use of historical practices, highlighting both its proponents and critics. We examines textualism, contrasting its strict application with more flexible interpretations, and sho…
  continue reading
 
This is part 2 to eight common interpretive approaches, including textualism, original meaning, and historical practices. A subsequent report focuses specifically on the use of historical practices, highlighting both its proponents and critics. We examines textualism, contrasting its strict application with more flexible interpretations, and showca…
  continue reading
 
This is part 1 to eight common interpretive approaches, including textualism, original meaning, and historical practices. A subsequent report focuses specifically on the use of historical practices, highlighting both its proponents and critics. We examines textualism, contrasting its strict application with more flexible interpretations, and showca…
  continue reading
 
The case of San Francisco v. EPA. The case centers on the EPA's use of "generic prohibitions" in discharge permits, which San Francisco argues are vague and fail to provide adequate notice of discharge limitations. The dispute hinges on the interpretation of Section 301(b)(1)(C) of the Clean Water Act, focusing on whether it allows limitations beyo…
  continue reading
 
The case Bufkin v. McDonough. The central issue concerns the standard of review for the Veterans Court's assessment of the Department of Veterans Affairs’ application of the "benefit-of-the-doubt" rule. Petitioners argue for a less deferential review, emphasizing the statute's intent to ensure meaningful scrutiny of the agency's decisions. The resp…
  continue reading
 
The case Bouarfa v. Mayorkas. The central issue is whether the revocation of an immigration petition, following a determination of sham marriage, is subject to judicial review. The petitioner argues that the revocation is mandatory and thus reviewable, citing statutory language and the government’s consistent practice. The respondent, the governmen…
  continue reading
 
The case of Medical Marijuana, Inc. v. Horn. The central question is whether economic losses stemming from personal injuries are recoverable under RICO. The petitioner argues that RICO excludes such claims, emphasizing the distinction between "injury" (invasion of a legal right) and "damages" (monetary losses resulting from injury). The respondent …
  continue reading
 
The case of Glossip v. State of Oklahoma, focusing on whether the state court's denial of the petitioner's request to waive procedural bars to his habeas corpus claim constitutes an adequate and independent state ground for review. The central issue revolves around alleged Brady and Napue violations, specifically the prosecution's suppression of ev…
  continue reading
 
The case of Lackey v. Stinnie, heard on October 8, 2024. The central question concerns whether a preliminary injunction constitutes a "prevailing party" status under Section 1988, allowing for attorney's fee awards. The petitioner argues that a preliminary injunction, being a temporary measure not deciding the case's merits, does not qualify. The r…
  continue reading
 
The case Garland v. VanDerStok, concerning the legality of a Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) rule regulating firearm parts kits and partially complete receivers. The Solicitor General argued the rule is consistent with existing law and addresses a serious public safety issue, while the respondents contended the ATF exceede…
  continue reading
 
The case Royal Canin v. Wullschleger. The core issue revolves around whether a federal court retains supplemental jurisdiction after a plaintiff amends their complaint to remove all federal claims, particularly in cases initially brought in state court and then removed. Petitioners argue established precedent and Section 1367 support retaining juri…
  continue reading
 
The case Williams v. Fitzgerald. The central issue is whether an Alabama state law requiring exhaustion of administrative remedies before bringing a §1983 due process claim is preempted by federal law. The petitioner argues that the state's exhaustion requirement creates an insurmountable barrier to accessing federal courts, effectively granting th…
  continue reading
 
This week, Lacey discusses escapee monkeys in South Carolina. Then, Ashley talks about a murderous car crash. We conclude with some listener stories and our wacky weeks. Did something wacky happen to you this week? Email us at unitedstatesofmurder@gmail.comYou may now join us on ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Patreon⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ or ⁠⁠⁠⁠…
  continue reading
 
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether, when a noncitizen's voluntary-departure period ends on a weekend or public holiday, a motion to reopen filed the next business day is sufficient to avoid the penalties for failure to depart under 8 U.S.C. § 1229c(d)(1). ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★저자 Better Informed Network
  continue reading
 
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether risk disclosures are false or misleading when they do not disclose that a risk has materialized in the past, even if that past event presents no known risk of ongoing or future business harm. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★저자 Better Informed Network
  continue reading
 
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether the burden of proof that employers must satisfy to demonstrate the applicability of a Fair Labor Standards Act exemption is a mere preponderance of the evidence or clear and convincing evidence. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★저자 Better Informed Network
  continue reading
 
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether the phrase “entitled ... to benefits,” used twice in the same sentence of the Medicare Act, means the same thing for Medicare part A and Supplemental Social Security benefits, such that it includes all who meet basic program eligibility criteria, whether or not benefits are actually received. ★ Support this podcast on Pa…
  continue reading
 
Loading …

빠른 참조 가이드