))
23-677 Royal Canin U.S.A., Inc. v. Wullschleger [10/07/24]
Manage episode 451642516 series 3618198
Better Informed Network에서 제공하는 콘텐츠입니다. 에피소드, 그래픽, 팟캐스트 설명을 포함한 모든 팟캐스트 콘텐츠는 Better Informed Network 또는 해당 팟캐스트 플랫폼 파트너가 직접 업로드하고 제공합니다. 누군가가 귀하의 허락 없이 귀하의 저작물을 사용하고 있다고 생각되는 경우 여기에 설명된 절차를 따르실 수 있습니다 https://ko.player.fm/legal.
The case Royal Canin v. Wullschleger. The core issue revolves around whether a federal court retains supplemental jurisdiction after a plaintiff amends their complaint to remove all federal claims, particularly in cases initially brought in state court and then removed. Petitioners argue established precedent and Section 1367 support retaining jurisdiction, emphasizing the defendant's right to removal. Respondents contend the amended complaint should control, aligning with a principle that the operative pleading determines jurisdiction. The justices' questions explore the nuances of Section 1367, precedent (including Cohill and Rockwell), and the implications for various jurisdictional doctrines.
16 에피소드
공유
