Episode 16: A Deadly & Evolutionarily-Maladaptive Vexine: A Dirty Die---A Schmitt & Atwill Review of the Weinstein, Malone & Kirsch DARKHORSE Interview

1:03:35
 
공유
 

Manage episode 297885864 series 2953518
Player FM과 저희 커뮤니티의 David Schmitt 콘텐츠는 모두 원 저작자에게 속하며 Player FM이 아닌 작가가 저작권을 갖습니다. 오디오는 해당 서버에서 직접 스트리밍 됩니다. 구독 버튼을 눌러 Player FM에서 업데이트 현황을 확인하세요. 혹은 다른 팟캐스트 앱에서 URL을 불러오세요.
itunes pic
Dave Schmitt, Ph.D., a neurobiologist, and Mr. Joe Atwill, a software entrepreneur, discuss the accumulation of empirical evidence that is amassing and vindicating the conclusions that have been presented here, since December 2020, on The Second Society Podcast and arrived at using the 'a priori' rationalist reasoning available to us at the time.
Dr. Bret Weinstein, a biology professor, formerly of Evergreen College who fought a courageous battle against an early version of “woke” insanity, now has a video broadcast named Darkhorse. He hosts two guests, Dr. Robert Malone and Mr. Steven Kirsch. The Darkhorse interview is three hours and 16 minutes long and is worth every minute.
Listen here:
https://youtu.be/-_NNTVJzqtY
Malone is a physician and virologist responsible for developing the mRNA platform for what is being called a “vaccine.” Kirsch is a software entrepreneur who became a quick student of the vaccine and its effects after learning of the adverse effects suffered by his neighbors.
All three men examine the disturbing reality of adverse effects associated with, particularly the mRNA pharmaceutical devices that Schmitt calls, alternatively, pseudovaccines or vexines. (It is apparent that we are engaged in a psychological operation (psyop) and that linguistic weapons are being used against those of us who have been trying to raise the alarm against these ill-tested, rushed pharma products. It is fine is we press back a bit.)
It is clear that Kirsch is doing yeoman’s work in diligently researching the problems with the adverse effects of these pseudovaccines.
Shared post - We have 1,100 members!! (locals.com)
Kirsch brings to the table the data that shows the woeful underreporting of adverse reactions to the “vaccines.” Malone seconds this with insider reports from the regulatory watchdogs.
Consider Event 201 where something that looks essentially and eerily like this very pandemic was table-topped by Johns Hopkins University and a collection of influencers and experts funded by the Bill & Melinda Gate Foundation, and war-gamed in October 2019, immediately before the actual "outbreak."
Schmitt believes that the SARS-CoV-2 is likely a real virus, whereas Atwill is less convinced. Both agree, however, that the pandemic was--in actuality--a fraudulently-manipulated and exaggerated scam based on misuse of the PCR-DNA amplification procedures, manipulations of policies regarding the reporting of deaths and typical influenza cases, the egregiously abusive actions of some state governors (e.g., Governor Cuomo in New York), and pure sophistry that took advantage of the gullibility and hypochondriasis of the public. In an earlier podcast, listen here,
https://www.podomatic.com/podcasts/deschmitt/episodes/2021-03-29T19_18_02-07_00
Schmitt retells his own experience with a medical laboratory's refusal to inform him--before or after--of the cycle count, Ct, that would be employed in a PCR nucleic-acid amplification procedure. Schmitt was directed to have this laboratory amplification of nucleic acid done by his physician in anticipation of a minor surgical procedure deemed important. Unable to receive a proper reply from an afternoon on the phone, Schmitt was told by the surgeon’s office that if a delay of several weeks until after May 20, 2021 was acceptable, the hospital would no longer require the PCR test at that time. This represents an arbitrary and malfeasant misuse of medical-laboratory procedures and resulted in delay of care.
The dial-up/dial-down aspect of the Ct figure enables a decision maker or bean counter to come up with a pre-determined result on the PCR (it is not a real) test regarding supposed COVID infection. Where is Kari Mullis when you need him? Look him up and research his opinion on the use--or misuse--of the PCR technique for diagnostic purposes.
https://youtu.be/ZmZft4fXhQQ
The late Dr. Mullis developed the PCR technique and received the Nobel Prize for the same. He died on August 07, 2019, just weeks before the Event 201 table-top even and subsequent appearance in the news of an outbreak of what would come to be called the Coronavirus “pandemic.”
Mullis was harshly critical of Dr. Fauci regarding the latter’s overseeing the response to what was came to be a Media-driven, world-wide focus of attention on HIV/AIDS.
https://youtu.be/5aISPlTLbJo
Fauci would certainly have known of the dial-up/dial-down feature of the PCR technique for amplifying the chemical signal of just about any fragment of DNA. Despite Fauci’s early-2020 public statement regarding the problem of excessive Ct values for the PCR procedure associated with “false positive interpretations,” he was the leader of a large operation that relied upon, and condoned, the use of high and unreported Ct values.
High Ct values were used to inflate the claims that a pandemic state existed. Low Ct values could be handy when a hospital want to sell a procedure.
It is not imaginable that anyone in medical or scientific leadership who was promoting, implicitly or explicitly, the reckless use of the PCR--as was and is the case--could have been invincibly ignorant.
Atwill points out, now with accumulating evidence, that those criticizing the remainder in society who were and are rationally and justifiably skeptical need to be told to “follow the science.” The critics of the present are not all merely concerned for their own safety, but for the safety of all. Even more important, these critics of the global vaccination project dreamed of by the oligarchs are concerned for all of humanity, the totality of our species.
Discussed in the Darkhorse video is an alarming finding that after injection with the mRNA products in question, polyethylene glycol and other lipids used to form the nanoparticulate packaging around the mRNA, accumulates at very high levels in the ovaries and the bone marrow. This presents alarming possibilities for reproductive harm, possibly sterility, fetal deformities and bone marrow-related cancers such as leukemia and lymphomas.
(Schmitt raises in this podcast an additional concern about a cancer of the plasma cells called multiple myeloma. These cells can come to settle in locations such as the bone. The carcinogenic transformation is thought to occur, according to one hypothesized mechanism, via chronic-antigenic stimulation of both monoclonal and polyclonal proliferation of B cells.)
Furthermore, Malone indicates that there is an unexpected dissemination of the spike protein in the circulation as Schmitt and Atwill have discussed in recent podcasts as well. Thus, cells in the body may be presenting these aberrant forms of spike proteins as well as releasing them into the circulation, for a very long time---perhaps for a lifetime and representing a state chronic antigenic stimulation as just discussed.
Certainly, autoimmune disorders are the imaginable, consequence of cells labeling themselves for attack. Moreover, given that 95% of the proteins encoded by the genome are found uniquely in the nervous system, the potential for neurological disorders is great.
All neurological disorders can be considered to be horrific.
The biological and medical features of this fake pandemic whipped up to take advantage of, if it exists as Schmitt believes is likely, the SARS-CoV-2 virus. That is, whatever the backstory—an accidental release of a gain-of-function experiment gone awry or a deliberate bioweapon release—biology has become political. It has become political--if not in its very inception, at least in its exploitation--in order to create the possibility of the, so-called, “Great Reset” of world social, institutional and economic power. The readers and listeners are urged to visit the following site for insights into this "plandemic/scamdemic," as it is aptly called:
https://www.corbettreport.com/
Schmitt and Atwill have numerous times discussed the need for the public to break free of the trance of Media manipulated-mind control and an overly submissive attitude toward governmental authorities and their crafting of false realities. During the podcast, mention was made of the 1967 CIA memorandum #1035-360 that promulgated the use of the term, ‘conspiracy theory’, as a term of disparagement to discourage the citizenry from appropriately asking questions:
https://archive.org/details/CIADOC1035960/page/n1/mode/2up
As first described in our early podcasts, humankind is potentially facing the presence of a very powerful, predatory force. The only proper response is that of the normal, healthy behavior, called vigilance, as exemplified in flocking animals well-studied by animal behaviorists, or ethologists, and written about by Nobel Laureate, Konrad Lorenz. Thus, any criticism that rational questioning by the public as being indicative of a pejoratively-used phrase “conspiracy theory,” with its subterranean implication and controlling smear of questioning as being prima facie evidence of a psychopathological state, must be met with a firm and sound explanation of the importance of some number of us being like vigilant birds. The vigilant birds provide a critical service to their flock mates as their flock mates blithefully graze for food.
Kirsch insisted on introducing the notion that there could very well be a “group in a room” who are responsible for more than merely accidental consequences of the “vaccines” released with “Warp Speed.” There is a rational and plausible suggestion that there was foreknowledge leading multiple parts of this COVID event. Bret Weinstein labored hard to place on the table an explanation based upon biological and systems-theory emergent properties that could merely make it appear as though there were malevolent forces at work with nefarious designs. This hypothesis Atwill and Schmitt find unconvincing. Imagine for a moment, the Georgia Guide stones and the implications for intent to depopulate---not an unfamiliar concern of oligarchs throughout history, including contemporary figures.
Consider the excellent production by James Corbett and Brock West:
Who Is Bill Gates? (Full Documentary, 2020).
https://www.corbettreport.com/who-is-bill-gates-full-documentary-2020/
At the end, Dave Schmitt opens up the first half of a two-part concept that needs to be continued with a subsequent podcast. Specifically, Schmitt plans to demonstrate for the listeners the notion that there is a confluence of the concepts of a moral hazard and an evolutionary hazard that is incurred with any significant use of the mRNA technology for the purposes of vaccination, or for putatively-claimed therapeutic, widespread administration of the mRNA product for altering protein function in the population or for modifying human characteristics for transhumanistic goals. This is a dangerous form of selective, evolutionary process deprived of the benefits of natural or sexual selection.
Again, alteration of nervous systems, mental activity, behavioral responses and the makeup of the psyches of human persons is much more than the stuff of science-fiction books and movies. The possible consequences of these pseudovaccines takes some effort to appreciate.
As Kari Mullis said in an interview linked above, most people are not really in a position to judge who is a good scientist and who is not. Schmitt would add that this is where they need a connection with vigilant birds who demonstrate tested concern for their people. The easy signs that most people employ for identifying who to respect most often mislead, and do so with disastrous consequences for individuals and, in the is case, for humankind as a whole. Both are worth saving in all of their complexities and simplicities.
The “choice” that the public is being given—regardless of their capacity for informed consent--is more of a coercion. The public is being told that they need to take a slight gamble with very little risk. But as we are learning, the true risks of hideous debilitations or death are enormous compared to what is typically considered acceptable in regulatory vaccinology.
Indeed, it is not truly a risk that one is taking. It is more like certain toss with a dirty die.

20 에피소드