Artwork

The Federalist Society에서 제공하는 콘텐츠입니다. 에피소드, 그래픽, 팟캐스트 설명을 포함한 모든 팟캐스트 콘텐츠는 The Federalist Society 또는 해당 팟캐스트 플랫폼 파트너가 직접 업로드하고 제공합니다. 누군가가 귀하의 허락 없이 귀하의 저작물을 사용하고 있다고 생각되는 경우 여기에 설명된 절차를 따르실 수 있습니다 https://ko.player.fm/legal.
Player FM -팟 캐스트 앱
Player FM 앱으로 오프라인으로 전환하세요!

Is There a "Death Squad" at the U.S. Patent Office?: Examining the Patent Trial and Appeal Board

 
공유
 

Manage episode 185283211 series 1460717
The Federalist Society에서 제공하는 콘텐츠입니다. 에피소드, 그래픽, 팟캐스트 설명을 포함한 모든 팟캐스트 콘텐츠는 The Federalist Society 또는 해당 팟캐스트 플랫폼 파트너가 직접 업로드하고 제공합니다. 누군가가 귀하의 허락 없이 귀하의 저작물을 사용하고 있다고 생각되는 경우 여기에 설명된 절차를 따르실 수 있습니다 https://ko.player.fm/legal.

In 2011, Congress created a new administrative tribunal in the U.S. Patent Office with the power to cancel previously granted patents, called the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB). The PTAB was created to provide an efficient and inexpensive administrative process for eliminating low-quality patents what are called “bad patents. Despite its laudable purpose, the PTAB has earned a reputation among some as a prime example of regulatory overreach. The PTABs critics cite a wide range of concerns including inadequate due process protections and bias against patents. A former federal appellate chief judge even referred to PTAB administrative judges as “patent death squads. So, is the PTAB indeed harming the property rights that have helped to drive the U.S. innovation economy for over 200 years or, is it functioning as intended? What are the concerns of its detractors? If these concerns are valid, does the PTAB need simple reform or more?

This teleforum is held in conjunction with the Monday, August 14 release of a paper authored by members of the Regulatory Transparency Projects Intellectual Property Working Group. The paper is called “Crippling the Innovation Economy: Regulatory Overreach at the Patent Office. This paper, which discusses this new administrative tribunal at the Patent Office, is available for viewing and download atRegProject.org.

Featuring:

  • Josh Malone,Inventor,Bunch O Balloons

  • Kristen Osenga,Professor, University of Richmond School of Law

  • Brian OShaughnessy,Partner, Dinsmore & Shohl LLP

  • DevonWesthill,Director, Regulatory Transparency Project (Moderator)

  continue reading

11 에피소드

Artwork
icon공유
 
Manage episode 185283211 series 1460717
The Federalist Society에서 제공하는 콘텐츠입니다. 에피소드, 그래픽, 팟캐스트 설명을 포함한 모든 팟캐스트 콘텐츠는 The Federalist Society 또는 해당 팟캐스트 플랫폼 파트너가 직접 업로드하고 제공합니다. 누군가가 귀하의 허락 없이 귀하의 저작물을 사용하고 있다고 생각되는 경우 여기에 설명된 절차를 따르실 수 있습니다 https://ko.player.fm/legal.

In 2011, Congress created a new administrative tribunal in the U.S. Patent Office with the power to cancel previously granted patents, called the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB). The PTAB was created to provide an efficient and inexpensive administrative process for eliminating low-quality patents what are called “bad patents. Despite its laudable purpose, the PTAB has earned a reputation among some as a prime example of regulatory overreach. The PTABs critics cite a wide range of concerns including inadequate due process protections and bias against patents. A former federal appellate chief judge even referred to PTAB administrative judges as “patent death squads. So, is the PTAB indeed harming the property rights that have helped to drive the U.S. innovation economy for over 200 years or, is it functioning as intended? What are the concerns of its detractors? If these concerns are valid, does the PTAB need simple reform or more?

This teleforum is held in conjunction with the Monday, August 14 release of a paper authored by members of the Regulatory Transparency Projects Intellectual Property Working Group. The paper is called “Crippling the Innovation Economy: Regulatory Overreach at the Patent Office. This paper, which discusses this new administrative tribunal at the Patent Office, is available for viewing and download atRegProject.org.

Featuring:

  • Josh Malone,Inventor,Bunch O Balloons

  • Kristen Osenga,Professor, University of Richmond School of Law

  • Brian OShaughnessy,Partner, Dinsmore & Shohl LLP

  • DevonWesthill,Director, Regulatory Transparency Project (Moderator)

  continue reading

11 에피소드

모든 에피소드

×
 
Loading …

플레이어 FM에 오신것을 환영합니다!

플레이어 FM은 웹에서 고품질 팟캐스트를 검색하여 지금 바로 즐길 수 있도록 합니다. 최고의 팟캐스트 앱이며 Android, iPhone 및 웹에서도 작동합니다. 장치 간 구독 동기화를 위해 가입하세요.

 

빠른 참조 가이드