Artwork

Mojo United LLC에서 제공하는 콘텐츠입니다. 에피소드, 그래픽, 팟캐스트 설명을 포함한 모든 팟캐스트 콘텐츠는 Mojo United LLC 또는 해당 팟캐스트 플랫폼 파트너가 직접 업로드하고 제공합니다. 누군가가 귀하의 허락 없이 귀하의 저작물을 사용하고 있다고 생각되는 경우 여기에 설명된 절차를 따르실 수 있습니다 https://ko.player.fm/legal.
Player FM -팟 캐스트 앱
Player FM 앱으로 오프라인으로 전환하세요!

Build Green To Get Green

42:12
 
공유
 

Manage episode 448949934 series 3608371
Mojo United LLC에서 제공하는 콘텐츠입니다. 에피소드, 그래픽, 팟캐스트 설명을 포함한 모든 팟캐스트 콘텐츠는 Mojo United LLC 또는 해당 팟캐스트 플랫폼 파트너가 직접 업로드하고 제공합니다. 누군가가 귀하의 허락 없이 귀하의 저작물을 사용하고 있다고 생각되는 경우 여기에 설명된 절차를 따르실 수 있습니다 https://ko.player.fm/legal.

Steve Barnes reveals the real value of energy incentives and credits.

In this episode, show host Jeff Nichols speaks with Steven Barnes, a Partner at Wipfli LLP, a top accounting firm that supports construction and real estate clients. Steve provides a straightforward primer on how energy incentives and credits can be materially significant and how they apply uniquely to commercial and not-for-profit buildings, and he explains how benefits can be allocated or used creatively to offset project costs and fund future initiatives. Find out what Steve means when he says building owners and operators must build green to get green.

Going deeper into this episode: It’s Not Always About Shielding Income

Savvy commercial building owners are drawn to these deductions and credits as they would be to capital asset depreciation and other familiar strategies that lower their taxable income. This tends to drive a higher level of awareness of these incentive programs in the private sector. However, many developers and designers who work on public or not-for-profit buildings are not as up-to-speed on what kinds of benefits are available or how to qualify.

Public buildings like schools, for example, may be looking to replace a dated and inefficient boiler with a renewable system like solar, geothermal, or biomass. These types of upgrades typically qualify for federal incentives under the Investment Tax Credit (ITC) and can range from 6% to 60% credit or cashback on a project.

So why aren’t more builders and building owners taking advantage of these incentives? Much of the reason has to do with the perceived barriers to energy tax incentive availability and qualification.

Here are a few of the top misperceptions:

  • Building owners and developers often assume the work they’re doing to upgrade their properties likely won’t qualify or, that the scope of the upgrade wasn’t big enough. The fact is that most work does qualify for significant deductions or credits.

  • The bar for qualification is too high so why bother? Actually, the standards for qualification are very achievable, especially for upgrades done within the prior 2-4 years. The main reason for this is that upgrades are compared with previously established ASHRE 2007 standards for energy use and efficiency. Many experts feel that the qualification benchmark is intentionally low to accelerate energy efficiency adoption.

  • It’s just too expensive to have my CPA firm look into this and advise me. The reality is that many firms price these consultations at a fraction of the value of the qualified deductions or credits.

The Evolving Energy Tax Advisor

Full-service advisory firms are becoming more capable of navigating their clients through these perceived barriers and challenges. Having these conversations with your tax advisor upfront before the work starts allows for a more comprehensive vetting of upgrade options, CapEx planning, and comparison with current local, state, or federal incentive programs and energy standards.

Energy consultations are also important where a client may be looking to apply for a 179D deduction for example, but instead may find that by the time the work was completed, a more favorable asset depreciation opportunity was available. Another example is with buildings that have commercial space on the ground floor and residential units on higher floors, a properly advised building owner can apply 179D (deduction) and 45L (qualifying credit) thus taking advantage of several programs at the same time. In other scenarios that apply more to public buildings, energy credits can be donated to a scholarship fund or another charitable program and then written off as a donation– some may say ‘double-dipping’.

These are just a few examples of why energy advisory firms are interested in sitting down with their clients to have a more strategic conversion leading to a potentially more beneficial and profitable outcome.

Stay tuned for the next episode of Reframe and join show host Jeff Nichols on a journey of discovery to learn first-hand how the stakeholders and innovators across the building and construction industry are turning energy challenges into opportunities for sustainable growth.

  continue reading

4 에피소드

Artwork

Build Green To Get Green

Reframe

published

icon공유
 
Manage episode 448949934 series 3608371
Mojo United LLC에서 제공하는 콘텐츠입니다. 에피소드, 그래픽, 팟캐스트 설명을 포함한 모든 팟캐스트 콘텐츠는 Mojo United LLC 또는 해당 팟캐스트 플랫폼 파트너가 직접 업로드하고 제공합니다. 누군가가 귀하의 허락 없이 귀하의 저작물을 사용하고 있다고 생각되는 경우 여기에 설명된 절차를 따르실 수 있습니다 https://ko.player.fm/legal.

Steve Barnes reveals the real value of energy incentives and credits.

In this episode, show host Jeff Nichols speaks with Steven Barnes, a Partner at Wipfli LLP, a top accounting firm that supports construction and real estate clients. Steve provides a straightforward primer on how energy incentives and credits can be materially significant and how they apply uniquely to commercial and not-for-profit buildings, and he explains how benefits can be allocated or used creatively to offset project costs and fund future initiatives. Find out what Steve means when he says building owners and operators must build green to get green.

Going deeper into this episode: It’s Not Always About Shielding Income

Savvy commercial building owners are drawn to these deductions and credits as they would be to capital asset depreciation and other familiar strategies that lower their taxable income. This tends to drive a higher level of awareness of these incentive programs in the private sector. However, many developers and designers who work on public or not-for-profit buildings are not as up-to-speed on what kinds of benefits are available or how to qualify.

Public buildings like schools, for example, may be looking to replace a dated and inefficient boiler with a renewable system like solar, geothermal, or biomass. These types of upgrades typically qualify for federal incentives under the Investment Tax Credit (ITC) and can range from 6% to 60% credit or cashback on a project.

So why aren’t more builders and building owners taking advantage of these incentives? Much of the reason has to do with the perceived barriers to energy tax incentive availability and qualification.

Here are a few of the top misperceptions:

  • Building owners and developers often assume the work they’re doing to upgrade their properties likely won’t qualify or, that the scope of the upgrade wasn’t big enough. The fact is that most work does qualify for significant deductions or credits.

  • The bar for qualification is too high so why bother? Actually, the standards for qualification are very achievable, especially for upgrades done within the prior 2-4 years. The main reason for this is that upgrades are compared with previously established ASHRE 2007 standards for energy use and efficiency. Many experts feel that the qualification benchmark is intentionally low to accelerate energy efficiency adoption.

  • It’s just too expensive to have my CPA firm look into this and advise me. The reality is that many firms price these consultations at a fraction of the value of the qualified deductions or credits.

The Evolving Energy Tax Advisor

Full-service advisory firms are becoming more capable of navigating their clients through these perceived barriers and challenges. Having these conversations with your tax advisor upfront before the work starts allows for a more comprehensive vetting of upgrade options, CapEx planning, and comparison with current local, state, or federal incentive programs and energy standards.

Energy consultations are also important where a client may be looking to apply for a 179D deduction for example, but instead may find that by the time the work was completed, a more favorable asset depreciation opportunity was available. Another example is with buildings that have commercial space on the ground floor and residential units on higher floors, a properly advised building owner can apply 179D (deduction) and 45L (qualifying credit) thus taking advantage of several programs at the same time. In other scenarios that apply more to public buildings, energy credits can be donated to a scholarship fund or another charitable program and then written off as a donation– some may say ‘double-dipping’.

These are just a few examples of why energy advisory firms are interested in sitting down with their clients to have a more strategic conversion leading to a potentially more beneficial and profitable outcome.

Stay tuned for the next episode of Reframe and join show host Jeff Nichols on a journey of discovery to learn first-hand how the stakeholders and innovators across the building and construction industry are turning energy challenges into opportunities for sustainable growth.

  continue reading

4 에피소드

모든 에피소드

×
 
Loading …

플레이어 FM에 오신것을 환영합니다!

플레이어 FM은 웹에서 고품질 팟캐스트를 검색하여 지금 바로 즐길 수 있도록 합니다. 최고의 팟캐스트 앱이며 Android, iPhone 및 웹에서도 작동합니다. 장치 간 구독 동기화를 위해 가입하세요.

 

빠른 참조 가이드