))
PUBLISHING ACADEMIC RESEARCH | Writing, Mental Health, and Productivity Tips for Your Scholarship, Thesis, or Dissertation
«
»
Reviewing Others' Scholarship without becoming Reviewer Two | Ep. 21
Manage episode 521216775 series 3681102
C. Kyle Rudick, PhD | Academic Writing Coach, C. Kyle Rudick, and PhD | Academic Writing Coach에서 제공하는 콘텐츠입니다. 에피소드, 그래픽, 팟캐스트 설명을 포함한 모든 팟캐스트 콘텐츠는 C. Kyle Rudick, PhD | Academic Writing Coach, C. Kyle Rudick, and PhD | Academic Writing Coach 또는 해당 팟캐스트 플랫폼 파트너가 직접 업로드하고 제공합니다. 누군가가 귀하의 허락 없이 귀하의 저작물을 사용하고 있다고 생각되는 경우 여기에 설명된 절차를 따르실 수 있습니다 https://ko.player.fm/legal.
Do you ever dread that journal review request hitting your inbox? Do you get worried you’ll either spend way too long on it or, worse, become Reviewer 2 in the process?
Hey co-authors! In this episode, we’re talking about how to review other people’s work without becoming Reviewer 2, the condescending, nitpicky, or ego-driven academic villain we’ve all encountered (and, if we’re honest, sometimes accidentally-on-purpose have been). You’ll learn how bad reviewers erode the culture of scholarship and discourage innovation, and how to avoid falling into those traps yourself.
In this episode, you’ll learn how to:
- Recognize and replace toxic review habits with constructive, ethical ones.
- Match your level of feedback to where the manuscript actually is to protect your time.
- Write feedback that’s direct but humane—firm without being cruel.
- Set clear limits for how many reviews you’ll do and how much energy you’ll give.
We’ll also talk about what good reviewing looks like and how to make sure you can do your best to review generously, critically, and responsibly without losing your empathy or your sanity.
Want to Connect?
Email: [email protected]
LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/in/c-kyle-rudick-59a040a7
Schedule a Free, 30-Minute Consultation: https://calendly.com/publishingacademicresearch/30min
24 에피소드
공유
