Episode 20: Recensio Aequalium

Nullius in Verba

Smriti Mehta and Daniël Lakens, Smriti Mehta, and Daniël Lakens에서 제공하는 콘텐츠입니다. 에피소드, 그래픽, 팟캐스트 설명을 포함한 모든 팟캐스트 콘텐츠는 Smriti Mehta and Daniël Lakens, Smriti Mehta, and Daniël Lakens 또는 해당 팟캐스트 플랫폼 파트너가 직접 업로드하고 제공합니다. 누군가가 귀하의 허락 없이 귀하의 저작물을 사용하고 있다고 생각되는 경우 여기에 설명된 절차를 따르실 수 있습니다 https://ko.player.fm/legal.

2y ago 1:12:06

MP3•에피소드 홈

In today’s episode, we discuss the peer review process---its history, its present, and its future. How does peer review work? How long has it existed in its current form? Should reviews be open and signed? Should reviewers be paid for their hard labor? Should we just abandon the peer review process, or does it have a positive role to play?

Shownotes

Peer Community in Registered Reports: https://rr.peercommunityin.org/

Suggestion to Darwin to publish a book about pigeons instead of The Origins of Species: https://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/letter/DCP-LETT-2457A.xml

Baldwin, M. (2018). Scientific Autonomy, Public Accountability, and the Rise of “Peer Review” in the Cold War United States. Isis, 109(3), 538–558. https://doi.org/10.1086/700070

Burnham, J. C. (1990). The evolution of editorial peer review. JAMA, 263(10), 1323–1329.

90 에피소드

#Science #Smriti Mehta and Daniël Lakens #Daniël Lakens #Smriti Mehta