#49 - The Supreme Court of Canada decision in Chieu and the Ribic Factors

Borderlines

Borderlines, Steven Meurrens, and Deanna Okun-Nachoff에서 제공하는 콘텐츠입니다. 에피소드, 그래픽, 팟캐스트 설명을 포함한 모든 팟캐스트 콘텐츠는 Borderlines, Steven Meurrens, and Deanna Okun-Nachoff 또는 해당 팟캐스트 플랫폼 파트너가 직접 업로드하고 제공합니다. 누군가가 귀하의 허락 없이 귀하의 저작물을 사용하고 있다고 생각되는 경우 여기에 설명된 절차를 따르실 수 있습니다 https://ko.player.fm/legal.

3y ago 53:55

MP3•에피소드 홈

Chieu v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2002 SCC 3 was a landmark Supreme Court of Canada which affirmed the use of the Ribic factors in the H&C assessment. We discuss these factors and how they are used in immigration appeals.1:00How the assessment of Humanitarian & Compassionate considerations has become somewhat nebulus. 4:00A case study of Chieu v. Canada 10:00What is an example of a negative country condition in someone’s country of citizenship? 13:00The decision and principles in Chieu. 15:00The Federal Court of Canada in Zhang v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 927, which seems to limit Chieu. 16:00The Ribic factors and the types of immigration appeals. 20:00How much weight each factor should get. 25:00Stories about our appeals. 32:00The remorse factor and flexibility. 45:00The counter arguments to considering country of citizenship conditions. 50:00 Consents on appeal.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

109 에피소드