Artwork

John Danaher에서 제공하는 콘텐츠입니다. 에피소드, 그래픽, 팟캐스트 설명을 포함한 모든 팟캐스트 콘텐츠는 John Danaher 또는 해당 팟캐스트 플랫폼 파트너가 직접 업로드하고 제공합니다. 누군가가 귀하의 허락 없이 귀하의 저작물을 사용하고 있다고 생각되는 경우 여기에 설명된 절차를 따르실 수 있습니다 https://ko.player.fm/legal.
Player FM -팟 캐스트 앱
Player FM 앱으로 오프라인으로 전환하세요!

#62 – Häggström on AI Motivations and Risk Denialism

 
공유
 

Manage episode 237316984 series 1328245
John Danaher에서 제공하는 콘텐츠입니다. 에피소드, 그래픽, 팟캐스트 설명을 포함한 모든 팟캐스트 콘텐츠는 John Danaher 또는 해당 팟캐스트 플랫폼 파트너가 직접 업로드하고 제공합니다. 누군가가 귀하의 허락 없이 귀하의 저작물을 사용하고 있다고 생각되는 경우 여기에 설명된 절차를 따르실 수 있습니다 https://ko.player.fm/legal.

Olle_Häggström

In this episode I talk to Olle Häggström. Olle is a professor of mathematical statistics at Chalmers University of Technology and a member of the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences (KVA) and of the Royal Swedish Academy of Engineering Sciences (IVA). Olle’s main research is in probability theory and statistical mechanics, but in recent years he has broadened his research interests to focus applied statistics, philosophy, climate science, artificial intelligence and social consequences of future technologies. He is the author of Here be Dragons: Science, Technology and the Future of Humanity (OUP 2016). We talk about AI motivations, specifically the Omohundro-Bostrom theory of AI motivation and its weaknesses. We also discuss AI risk denialism.

You can download the episode here or listen below. You can also subscribe to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, Stitcher and a variety of other podcasting services (the RSS feed is here).

Show Notes

  • 0:00 – Introduction
  • 2:02 – Do we need to define AI?
  • 4:15 – The Omohundro-Bostrom theory of AI motivation
  • 7:46 – Key concepts in the Omohundro-Bostrom Theory: Final Goals vs Instrumental Goals
  • 10:50 – The Orthogonality Thesis
  • 14:47 – The Instrumental Convergence Thesis
  • 20:16 – Resource Acquisition as an Instrumental Goal
  • 22:02 – The importance of goal-content integrity
  • 25:42 – Deception as an Instrumental Goal
  • 29:17 – How the doomsaying argument works
  • 31:46 – Critiquing the theory: the problem of self-referential final goals
  • 36:20 – The problem of incoherent goals
  • 42:44 – Does the truth of moral realism undermine the orthogonality thesis?
  • 50:50 – Problems with the distinction between instrumental goals and final goals
  • 57:52 – Why do some people deny the problem of AI risk?
  • 1:04:10 – Strong versus Weak AI Scepticism
  • 1:09:00 – Is it difficult to be taken seriously on this topic?

Relevant Links

  continue reading

64 에피소드

Artwork
icon공유
 
Manage episode 237316984 series 1328245
John Danaher에서 제공하는 콘텐츠입니다. 에피소드, 그래픽, 팟캐스트 설명을 포함한 모든 팟캐스트 콘텐츠는 John Danaher 또는 해당 팟캐스트 플랫폼 파트너가 직접 업로드하고 제공합니다. 누군가가 귀하의 허락 없이 귀하의 저작물을 사용하고 있다고 생각되는 경우 여기에 설명된 절차를 따르실 수 있습니다 https://ko.player.fm/legal.

Olle_Häggström

In this episode I talk to Olle Häggström. Olle is a professor of mathematical statistics at Chalmers University of Technology and a member of the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences (KVA) and of the Royal Swedish Academy of Engineering Sciences (IVA). Olle’s main research is in probability theory and statistical mechanics, but in recent years he has broadened his research interests to focus applied statistics, philosophy, climate science, artificial intelligence and social consequences of future technologies. He is the author of Here be Dragons: Science, Technology and the Future of Humanity (OUP 2016). We talk about AI motivations, specifically the Omohundro-Bostrom theory of AI motivation and its weaknesses. We also discuss AI risk denialism.

You can download the episode here or listen below. You can also subscribe to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, Stitcher and a variety of other podcasting services (the RSS feed is here).

Show Notes

  • 0:00 – Introduction
  • 2:02 – Do we need to define AI?
  • 4:15 – The Omohundro-Bostrom theory of AI motivation
  • 7:46 – Key concepts in the Omohundro-Bostrom Theory: Final Goals vs Instrumental Goals
  • 10:50 – The Orthogonality Thesis
  • 14:47 – The Instrumental Convergence Thesis
  • 20:16 – Resource Acquisition as an Instrumental Goal
  • 22:02 – The importance of goal-content integrity
  • 25:42 – Deception as an Instrumental Goal
  • 29:17 – How the doomsaying argument works
  • 31:46 – Critiquing the theory: the problem of self-referential final goals
  • 36:20 – The problem of incoherent goals
  • 42:44 – Does the truth of moral realism undermine the orthogonality thesis?
  • 50:50 – Problems with the distinction between instrumental goals and final goals
  • 57:52 – Why do some people deny the problem of AI risk?
  • 1:04:10 – Strong versus Weak AI Scepticism
  • 1:09:00 – Is it difficult to be taken seriously on this topic?

Relevant Links

  continue reading

64 에피소드

모든 에피소드

×
 
Loading …

플레이어 FM에 오신것을 환영합니다!

플레이어 FM은 웹에서 고품질 팟캐스트를 검색하여 지금 바로 즐길 수 있도록 합니다. 최고의 팟캐스트 앱이며 Android, iPhone 및 웹에서도 작동합니다. 장치 간 구독 동기화를 위해 가입하세요.

 

빠른 참조 가이드